New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Something Screwy RE Hillary Collapse

Jen

Senator
WTH?
Definitely something screwy about that.

First, Rush talks about it. Listen please (even if you hate Rush) and then look at the two videos I've posted. Notice the difference? Have we been punked? If so, by whom?



 

Jen

Senator
Hillary appears to enter the van from the passenger side in the top video and from the driver's side in the bottom. Do you know if the same camera allegedly took both shots?
They are posted as "different angles" which would mean two different cameras.

Just flipping it wouldn't give that result.
 
They are posted as "different angles" which would mean two different cameras.

Just flipping it wouldn't give that result.
I'm unclear on how she could appear to be entering the van from the passenger side in one video and the driver's side in the second? After watching the Clintons for twenty five long years, I would not be surprised if they are playing the voters again with exaggerated tales of Hillary's poor health. Sometimes the irony of this election becomes almost unbearable. Hillary is only running for POTUS because she "married well", and Bill won only because another billionaire grabbed 19% of the popular vote from Bush I in '92. Is there any way they could both lose?
 

Jen

Senator
I'm unclear on how she could appear to be entering the van from the passenger side in one video and the driver's side in the second? After watching the Clintons for twenty five long years, I would not be surprised if they are playing the voters again with exaggerated tales of Hillary's poor health. Sometimes the irony of this election becomes almost unbearable. Hillary is only running for POTUS because she "married well", and Bill won only because another billionaire grabbed 19% of the popular vote from Bush I in '92. Is there any way they could both lose?
That's the "WTH" here. She's not even entering from the same side of the car.

Both of them should be LOSERS. They are con artists. Nothing more.
 
That's the "WTH" here. She's not even entering from the same side of the car.

Both of them should be LOSERS. They are con artists. Nothing more.
Here's a socialist saying pretty much the same thing:

"SEPTEMBER 16, 2016
Trump is the Symptom, Clinton is the Disease"
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/16/trump-is-the-symptom-clinton-is-the-disease/

Those two videos would have had to have been shot separately unless there is some very sophisticated animation involved.

Frankly, I'm hoping one of the [Unwelcome language removed] dies before November, and the other gets indicted:D
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Any thoughts?
(shameless bump)
Someone wants to deceive us. What else can we conclude? I have to admit, I so both videos and didn't even notice the van was facing a different way. I would say these are two different collapses, or perhaps one was simply staged.
 

Days

Commentator
WTH?
Definitely something screwy about that.

First, Rush talks about it. Listen please (even if you hate Rush) and then look at the two videos I've posted. Notice the difference? Have we been punked? If so, by whom?



I can explain it, whoever posted one of these videos they flipped the video horizontally. If you watch the content of the two videos, they are identical.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
I can explain it, whoever posted one of these videos they flipped the video horizontally. If you watch the content of the two videos, they are identical.

Hillary appears to enter the van from the passenger side in the top video and from the driver's side in the bottom. Do you know if the same camera allegedly took both shots?
I could swear that the footage from the left appears to show Hillary more clearly. I need to watch both more carefully.

OK, I've done that. It appears it's the same video, simply flipped horizontally.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Can you link to a layman's explanation for how that is accomplished?
I know it's simple to do in Photoshop, did it many, many times myself. You can flip horizontally, vertically, skew, scale away from original proportions, etc. Presumably, one can do the same with video editing software.
 

Days

Commentator
Can you link to a layman's explanation for how that is accomplished?
No, cuz I made it up on my own. But I know you can flip pictures that way, you can flip them upside down also, so I'm sure you can flip videos that way. The contents of the videos are identical, this might be the exact same footage, flipped horizontally and zoomed.
 
Last edited:
I know it's simple to do in Photoshop, did it many, many times myself. You can flip horizontally, vertically, skew, scale away from original proportions, etc. Presumably, one can do the same with video editing software.
I get the feeling we will soon enter a technological age where you will literally be unable to believe your eyes?
 

Days

Commentator
I get the feeling we will soon enter a technological age where you will literally be unable to believe your eyes?
been there
... since around 2000.

The great thing about these tools is they were in heir infancy in 2001, so it was easy to see how the networks broad casted video shopped feeds on 09/11/2001. The tools were so crude back then, it is easy to catch.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
No, cuz I made it up on my own. But I know you can flip pictures that way, you can do flip them upside down also, so I'm sure you can flip videos that way. The contents of the videos are identical, this might be the exact same footage, flipped horizontally and zoomed.
I haven't been able to spot a single difference in either video, despite watching each closely several times. The movement of people, the angle of the van to the sidewalk, I don't see any difference other than the flipping.

Frankly, I'm a little embarrassed I fell for this. But in the end, it just goes to show you how closely we have to scrutinize information we are given.
 
Top