New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Clinton Legacy Under Attack.....From The Left

Zam-Zam

Senator
In the wake of Harvey Weinstein and others, I had a feeling this might be coming:


Liberals, Journalists Call for Reevaluation of Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Claims

A number of prominent liberals and journalists have recently called for a reevaluation of the merit of the sexual assault allegations against former Democratic President Bill Clinton.

"I Believe Juanita," wrote liberal New York Times journalist Michelle Goldberg, arguing that Juanita Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Bill Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room rang true after dozens of women leveled similar accusations at Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.

Still, Goldberg argued she was justified in disbelieving the claims against Clinton during his presidency, arguing it was Republicans' fault for pushing conspiracies that made her discount other, more credible claims.

The Atlantic‘s Caitlin Flanagan also called for a "reckoning" of Clinton. "Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990," she wrote. "They were on the wrong side of history…"

"It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks," she notes.

Clinton was also accused of groping White House employee Kathleen Wiley and sexually harassing Paula Jones in Arkansas; he eventually settled out of court with Jones for $850,000.

In a recent tweet thread, MSNBC's Chris Hayes called for a reexamination of Clinton, and like Goldberg, called attention to the similarities between Broaddrick's allegations and the conduct of Weinstein.


Complete text: http://freebeacon.com/politics/liberals-journalists-call-reevaluation-bill-clinton-sexual-assault-claims/


The times, they are a-changin'.................
 

connieb

Senator
In the wake of Harvey Weinstein and others, I had a feeling this might be coming:


Liberals, Journalists Call for Reevaluation of Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Claims

A number of prominent liberals and journalists have recently called for a reevaluation of the merit of the sexual assault allegations against former Democratic President Bill Clinton.

"I Believe Juanita," wrote liberal New York Times journalist Michelle Goldberg, arguing that Juanita Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Bill Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room rang true after dozens of women leveled similar accusations at Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.

Still, Goldberg argued she was justified in disbelieving the claims against Clinton during his presidency, arguing it was Republicans' fault for pushing conspiracies that made her discount other, more credible claims.

The Atlantic‘s Caitlin Flanagan also called for a "reckoning" of Clinton. "Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990," she wrote. "They were on the wrong side of history…"

"It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks," she notes.

Clinton was also accused of groping White House employee Kathleen Wiley and sexually harassing Paula Jones in Arkansas; he eventually settled out of court with Jones for $850,000.

In a recent tweet thread, MSNBC's Chris Hayes called for a reexamination of Clinton, and like Goldberg, called attention to the similarities between Broaddrick's allegations and the conduct of Weinstein.


Complete text: http://freebeacon.com/politics/liberals-journalists-call-reevaluation-bill-clinton-sexual-assault-claims/


The times, they are a-changin'.................

The sweet, sweet sound of lefty cannibalization.
 

Zam-Zam

Senator
The sweet, sweet sound of lefty cannibalization.

It seems these anti-Clinton stories are cropping up more and more in recent weeks, with the WaPo's Fusion GPS piece, the NY Times Uranium One coverage, Donna Brazile's book, etc. It's almost as if someone on the left doesn't want the Clintons around anymore.....
 

connieb

Senator
It seems these anti-Clinton stories are cropping up more and more in recent weeks, with the WaPo's Fusion GPS piece, the NY Times Uranium One coverage, Donna Brazile's book, etc. It's almost as if someone on the left doesn't want the Clintons around anymore.....
They have outlasted their usefulness... And, it is the changing of the guard... you can't spend the last 30 years cultivating an entire generation of perpetually aggrieved, offended and outraged buffoons... and not expect it to bite you in the arse eventually. You reap what you sow.
 
They have outlasted their usefulness... And, it is the changing of the guard... you can't spend the last 30 years cultivating an entire generation of perpetually aggrieved, offended and outraged buffoons... and not expect it to bite you in the arse eventually. You reap what you sow.
The (all white) lefty elite sealed their own demise when they openly embraced and encouraged anti-white racism in the form of BLM, Antifa, academia, and "white privilege" theory. That was the beginning of the end, as the anti-white racists have begun to logically conclude that they don't need any honkies telling them what to do anymore.
 

connieb

Senator
The (all white) lefty elite sealed their own demise when they openly embraced and encouraged anti-white racism in the form of BLM, Antifa, academia, and "white privilege" theory. That was the beginning of the end, as the anti-white racists have begun to logically conclude that they don't need any honkies telling them what to do anymore.
I agree, between that and the toxic Feminists they have so diligently nurtured, they are losing control. I came of age in the late 90's early 2000's. I remember the start of all the sexual harassment training. I remember being told that any advance on subordinate was deemed harassment - EVEN if it was consensual. Where do you think that came from??? The necessity of explaining that.

They have basically pandered to the malcontents for decades.. old hippies that they are.. went right to the easily swayed and those nursing some sort of grievance, chip on their shoulder, or anti-social tendencies, and they corralled them all and they stoked the flames.....

Social media though has allowed that to explode. They no longer control - via connections and loyalists - the information that is out there. And they have absolutely lost control of the narrative.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
In the wake of Harvey Weinstein and others, I had a feeling this might be coming:


Liberals, Journalists Call for Reevaluation of Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Claims

A number of prominent liberals and journalists have recently called for a reevaluation of the merit of the sexual assault allegations against former Democratic President Bill Clinton.

"I Believe Juanita," wrote liberal New York Times journalist Michelle Goldberg, arguing that Juanita Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Bill Clinton in an Arkansas hotel room rang true after dozens of women leveled similar accusations at Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.

Still, Goldberg argued she was justified in disbelieving the claims against Clinton during his presidency, arguing it was Republicans' fault for pushing conspiracies that made her discount other, more credible claims.

The Atlantic‘s Caitlin Flanagan also called for a "reckoning" of Clinton. "Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990," she wrote. "They were on the wrong side of history…"

"It was a pattern of behavior; it included an alleged violent assault; the women involved had far more credible evidence than many of the most notorious accusations that have come to light in the past five weeks," she notes.

Clinton was also accused of groping White House employee Kathleen Wiley and sexually harassing Paula Jones in Arkansas; he eventually settled out of court with Jones for $850,000.

In a recent tweet thread, MSNBC's Chris Hayes called for a reexamination of Clinton, and like Goldberg, called attention to the similarities between Broaddrick's allegations and the conduct of Weinstein.


Complete text: http://freebeacon.com/politics/liberals-journalists-call-reevaluation-bill-clinton-sexual-assault-claims/


The times, they are a-changin'.................
Will they include Hillary on the witch hunt?

I believe Juanita Broderick's nurse friend: Norma Rogers

Rogers recounted what she says she saw upon entering the room.

I went back to the room and I can’t remember if it was because she didn’t come down to the meeting because I expected her to have a short meeting and then come to the meeting. And so I went back up to the room and when I went back into the room and she was just very, very upset. She was crying.

And the thing I think I remember most is that her mouth was all swollen up. It was cut. And she just told me. She started then telling me the story of how he had just basically overtaken her and bit her lip in order to keep her quiet and to keep her from trying to leave or get away from him. And then she proceeded to tell me that he had pushed her onto the bed, and had raped her.

Her pantyhose were all ripped. And she was just in a terrible state. Crying and just, she began telling me, you know, what had happened.

But in the meantime she was starting to get her things together and she said we are leaving now. And you know we just started getting our stuff together and I drove her home.
 

Zam-Zam

Senator
They have outlasted their usefulness... And, it is the changing of the guard... you can't spend the last 30 years cultivating an entire generation of perpetually aggrieved, offended and outraged buffoons... and not expect it to bite you in the arse eventually. You reap what you sow.
Perhaps a certain faction of the DNC is concerned that the Clintons still have Presidential aspirations, and are trying to send them a not-so-subtle message.

This could get entertaining.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
The (all white) lefty elite sealed their own demise when they openly embraced and encouraged anti-white racism in the form of BLM, Antifa, academia, and "white privilege" theory. That was the beginning of the end, as the anti-white racists have begun to logically conclude that they don't need any honkies telling them what to do anymore.
Who among the "(all white) lefty elite" embraced or encouraged "anti-white racism" in any way?
 
Yawn,

Another "Clinton killed Abe Lincoln" thread by the right?

This the best MAGA Nation has right now?

No really, your RICO Master in Chief named Red Don is being investigated by the FBI for all sorts of crap.

Clinton's are free, helping people
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
You mean Obama?

1. He's not white.
2. This should go without saying, but there is nothing anti-white about the fact of a Black man being elected president.
3. What did he do to encourage anti-white racism?
O is more white than he is black.........he's more arab than black
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Yawn,

Another "Clinton killed Abe Lincoln" thread by the right?

This the best MAGA Nation has right now?

No really, your RICO Master in Chief named Red Don is being investigated by the FBI for all sorts of crap.

Clinton's are free, helping people
not free for long
 
Top