Show me where you have the right to sell a gun to anyone you choose...children (under the age of 18)...ex-felons, people with restraining orders, people who are undergoing court ordered psychiatric care.I will agree to do so...IF, you let me choose one that you have to compromise and the way you must compromise it.
Deal?
By the way...you have no ability to influence what will happen next. You guys should have worked with everyone else to figure out the best way to do something about gun violence. You didn't. You insisted that more guns were the solution....it wasn't. If not this mass murder or the next...the solution will be imposed on you with probably little input from the NRA or the far right.I will agree to do so...IF, you let me choose one that you have to compromise and the way you must compromise it.
Deal?
There are already laws regarding those circumstances. Keep your fascist hands off my civil rights.Show me where you have the right to sell a gun to anyone you choose...children (under the age of 18)...ex-felons, people with restraining orders, people who are undergoing court ordered psychiatric care.
I don't think that is in the 2nd amendment.
I never claimed that I had the right to do any of the above...unless you can show me otherwise. Focus on the question at hand...unless you have the same reading comprehension issues you so love to accuse others of.Show me where you have the right to sell a gun to anyone you choose...children (under the age of 18)...ex-felons, people with restraining orders, people who are undergoing court ordered psychiatric care.
I don't think that is in the 2nd amendment.
Background checks are mentioned where in the constitution? You are inventing one that the courts have ruled do not exist.There are already laws regarding those circumstances. Keep your fascist hands off my civil rights.
Not as long as conservatives hold SCOTUS...too bad for you Gorsuch got in instead of Garland...huh?By the way...you have no ability to influence what will happen next. You guys should have worked with everyone else to figure out the best way to do something about gun violence. You didn't. You insisted that more guns were the solution....it wasn't. If not this mass murder or the next...the solution will be imposed on you with probably little input from the NRA or the far right.
By the way...you have no ability to influence what will happen next. You guys should have worked with everyone else to figure out the best way to do something about gun violence. You didn't. You insisted that more guns were the solution....it wasn't. If not this mass murder or the next...the solution will be imposed on you with probably little input from the NRA or the far right.
Re-read the thread. You brought up the 2nd amendment and your "rights". Roughly 90% of voters polled want universal background checks. Your civil rights are not impacted by Universal Background Checks.I never claimed that I had the right to do any of the above...unless you can show me otherwise. Focus on the question at hand...unless you have the same reading comprehension issues you so love to accuse others of.
What was it you posted on another thread yesterday? Was it "Stay on topic."? Practice what you preach...and quit putting words in the mouths of others...how 'bout it?
Good luck with that.....courts to now have upheld background checks as well as universal background checks. One of the top republican money guys has now said "no more money" unless they work towards improved gun laws.Not as long as conservatives hold SCOTUS...too bad for you Gorsuch got in instead of Garland...huh?
And polls have been oh so correct in the last couple of years...right? What was it...a sampling of 2,500 people in the state of New York?Re-read the thread. You brought up the 2nd amendment and your "rights". Roughly 90% of voters polled want universal background checks. Your civil rights are not impacted by Universal Background Checks.
Boy...you just refuse to stay on topic...don't you?Good luck with that.....courts to now have upheld background checks as well as universal background checks. One of the top republican money guys has now said "no more money" unless they work towards improved gun laws.
Get ready. Either this mass murder or the next.....
The fact is that most polls had the race very close...and given a 4% margin of error...And polls have been oh so correct in the last couple of years...right? What was it...a sampling of 2,500 people in the state of New York?
By the way...did Hillary win the Presidency...you know...like the polls said she would?
You can shove poll...well, you know where...
The fact is that most polls had the race very close...and given a 4% margin of error...And polls have been oh so correct in the last couple of years...right? What was it...a sampling of 2,500 people in the state of New York?
By the way...did Hillary win the Presidency...you know...like the polls said she would?
You can shove poll...well, you know where...
Background checks have been upheld by the US Supreme Court.Boy...you just refuse to stay on topic...don't you?
I told you yesterday...I don't disagree with background checks. I've went through one on nearly every gun I've ever bought. I couldn't care less about a background check. I don't buy guns from private sellers...don't need to, I buy...and can afford to buy...new firearms, from dealers.
Let's try to stay on topic here...
Besides...it doesn't matter if 100% of people polled believe something unconstitutional should be done...the 100% doesn't matter...only 9 people in robes can make that determination...and at this time, the majority of those 9 justices favor my position.
Too bad for you we have Gorsuch rather than Garland...right? (kinda feel like I'm repeating myself here)
double digit leads for Shrill=LMAOAnd polls have been oh so correct in the last couple of years...right? What was it...a sampling of 2,500 people in the state of New York?
By the way...did Hillary win the Presidency...you know...like the polls said she would?
You can shove poll...well, you know where...
The fact is that most polls had the race very close...and given a 4% margin of error...
There have been a number of polls. I included links to more than one.
Background checks have been upheld by the US Supreme Court.
You claimed your rights were being taken away...What rights are you talking about?Like I said...your reading comprehension is severely suffering today. I have never, not once, said background checks are unconstitutional...as a matter of fact, weren't even mentioned in my post. No idea how it even relates to my post.
I'm not going down this stupid rabbit hole any further with you. Further responses focusing on background checks will be done to yourself...
And I said that where? Seems to me my post was a question...not a statement. And, was aimed at people wishing me to compromise...You claimed your rights were being taken away...What rights are you talking about?
Wow...So your headline really wasn't about your 2nd amendment rights...And I said that where? Seems to me my post was a question...not a statement. And, was aimed at people wishing me to compromise...
Like I said...poor reading comprehension on your part.
property rights.Show me where you have the right to sell a gun to anyone you choose...children (under the age of 18)...ex-felons, people with restraining orders, people who are undergoing court ordered psychiatric care.
I don't think that is in the 2nd amendment.