You tell me, Einstein.What commentator from a major news network tweeted or used that image?
You tell me, Einstein.What commentator from a major news network tweeted or used that image?
AW...Poor Donnie. Gets what he gives. Cry me a river.The left have made political violence acceptable in 2018. It won't be their best decision.
Your jackboots are showing, soldat.That's pretty stupid, my virtuous ally. You might want to stick to practicing heil Trumps, sewing red hats and cooking dinner - keep your virtuosity intact. Let us less virtuous MAGA men take up the intellectual battle since we can put crosshairs on anyone, and we certainly will.
The president is well-protected, no need to worry about him. It's all the innocent regular Americans you people are beating, shooting and running over that is worrisome.AW...Poor Donnie. Gets what he gives. Cry me a river.
You posted that picture in response to a top post about a commentator on major news network tweeting a pic of the President with cross hairs on him. Soooooo what major news network had a commentator used the pick you posted in a tweet or in any other way?You tell me, Einstein.
"In Response". I don't take responsibility for what you right wing fools post. When you click on "REPLY" the photo someone else posted showed up...I didn't post it....I used the correct way to respond to a post. How stupid can you be?You posted that picture in response to a top post about a commentator on major news network tweeting a pic of the President with cross hairs on him. Soooooo what major news network had a commentator used the pick you posted in a tweet or in any other way?
I'll wait..........
Or you can just admit that you don't get it
Apparently not as stupid as you....thanks we know now you don't get it."In Response". I don't take responsibility for what you right wing fools post. When you click on "REPLY" the photo someone else posted showed up...I didn't post it....I used the correct way to respond to a post. How stupid can you be?
"WE"? Don't you have a thought of your own without including the other slobbering Trump Deplorables here?Apparently not as stupid as you....thanks we know now you don't get it.
You should really just stop talking."WE"? Don't you have a thought of your own without including the other slobbering Trump Deplorables here?
Let me know when you're ready for that liberal liberal stomping.Your jackboots are showing, soldat.
That doesn't look like any targeting scope cross hairs I've ever seen.Once again, The Left ...........does something that anyone from the Right is NOT allowed to do:
CNN commentator, Chris Cillizza, tweeted out the image just before 9 a.m., along with the caption “Donald Trump, pointing to heavens to commemorate police officers killed in the line of duty.”
But when Sarah Palin put the crosshair on a map (not on a person as Cillizza did) all hell broke loose:
Huffington Post:
Is the target map that Sarah Palin published, showing Gabrielle Giffords’ Congressional District under the cross hairs of a gun, relevant to press coverage of the shootings today in Arizona?
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords certainly thought Sarah Palin’s map was relevant to the threat of violence. This is what she told MSNBC on March 25, 2010:
“...for example, we’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list, but the thing is that the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district, and when people do that, they’ve gotta realize there are consequences to that action.”
Yep. Lefty can do crosshairs right on President Trump.
Righty can't even do crosshairs on a map.
Punishment Was to Play "Ed" on Charlie Sheen's Anger ManagementRemember when Greg Gianforte personally body-slammed a reporter and the right cheered him on?
Really?Once again, The Left ...........does something that anyone from the Right is NOT allowed to do:
CNN commentator, Chris Cillizza, tweeted out the image just before 9 a.m., along with the caption “Donald Trump, pointing to heavens to commemorate police officers killed in the line of duty.”
But when Sarah Palin put the crosshair on a map (not on a person as Cillizza did) all hell broke loose:
Huffington Post:
Is the target map that Sarah Palin published, showing Gabrielle Giffords’ Congressional District under the cross hairs of a gun, relevant to press coverage of the shootings today in Arizona?
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords certainly thought Sarah Palin’s map was relevant to the threat of violence. This is what she told MSNBC on March 25, 2010:
“...for example, we’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list, but the thing is that the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district, and when people do that, they’ve gotta realize there are consequences to that action.”
Yep. Lefty can do crosshairs right on President Trump.
Righty can't even do crosshairs on a map.
And?That doesn't look like any targeting scope cross hairs I've ever seen.
Now that you've gone full Arkady (ahead of schedule, I might add), it's time for you to make the Wall of Fame! Congratulations!Let me know when you're ready for that liberal stomping.
Probably because you've never seen any.That doesn't look like any targeting scope cross hairs I've ever seen.
That is not a scope targeting ring, as I showed you in post #53.And?
Are you assuming you've seen them all?
Not sure what your point is.
Since you're an expert please identify the manufacturer of that particular scope.Probably because you've never seen any.
I sure hope it's a Chinese scope because MAGA!Since you're an expert please identify the manufacturer of that particular scope.
Byline by Layin'at least she wasn't under his desk giving blow jobs