New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

If you were a bank robber...

Spamature

President
And you found out that there was this bank that was robbed. Yet the head of the bank not only refused to admit it had been robbed, but he also did what ever he could to foul up the police investigation into the crime.

Which bank you do think you and all the bank robbers around the world would pick as their next target ?
 

Dino

Russian Asset
And you found out that there was this bank that was robbed. Yet the head of the bank not only refused to admit it had been robbed, but he also did what ever he could to foul up the police investigation into the crime.

Which bank you do think you and all the bank robbers around the world would pick as their next target ?
If a bank got robbed and you were the police would you infiltrate their organization by placing spies in their bank board meetings and start indicting the board of directors for actions not involving the robbery?

It’s not a totally apt comparison but is far more closer to the truth than your clunky and chronologically illogical analogy.
 

Spamature

President
If a bank got robbed and you were the police would you infiltrate their organization by placing spies in their bank board meetings and start indicting the board of directors for actions not involving the robbery?

It’s not a totally apt comparison but is far more closer to the truth than your clunky and chronologically illogical analogy.
If I thought it could be an inside job ? Yeah, I would.

Now what ?
 

Dino

Russian Asset
If I thought it could be an inside job ? Yeah, I would.

Now what ?
What lead you to believe it was an inside job without a shred of evidence?
Imagine the other bank acrosss the street, Clinton First National was robbed multiple times but you only placed an informant in the other bank, wouldn’t that appear sketchy?
 

Spamature

President
What lead you to believe it was an inside job without a shred of evidence?
Imagine the other bank acrosss the street, Clinton First National was robbed multiple times but you only placed an informant in the other bank, wouldn’t that appear sketchy?
Who said there wasn't a shred of evidence ?

Yeah if you their was a suspicion that Trump's Payday Loans was involved with the robbers. You know like meeting up with the robbers in the hopes of getting some of the loot.

Or openly asking the robbers spread some of that loot around "if they are listening".

Or that having another investigation done by the lawyers for Clinton First National which independently produced evidence that explicitly says that the head of Trump's Payday Loans cooperated with the bank robbers.

In addition to said head of that company constantly praising the head of the robbery gang.

Or finding out that there were dozens of meetings during the robbery, between the top executives at Trump's Payday Loans and the robbery gang.

Or that the head of security was also on the payroll of the robbery gang.

Or the COO of Trump's Payday Loans was millions in debt to members of the robbery gang.

It appears sketchy alright. The probably cause just keeps piling up

Trump's Payday Loans would be a definite target for an investigation.
 
Last edited:

Dino

Russian Asset
Who said there wasn't a shred of evidence ?

Yeah if you their was a suspicion that Trump's Payday Loans was involved with the robbers. You know like meeting up with the robbers in the hopes of getting some of the loot. Or openly asking the robbers spread some of that loot around "if they are listening". Or that having another investigation done by the lawyers for Clinton First National which independently produced evidence that explicitly says that the head of Trump's Payday Loans cooperated with the bank robbers. In addition to said head of that company constantly praising the head of the robbery gang. Or finding out that there were dozens of meetings with the robbery between the top executives at Trump's Payday Loans and the robbery gang. Or that the head of security was also on the payroll of the robbery gang. Or the COO of Trump's Payday Loans was millions in debt to members of the robbery gang.

It appears sketchy alright.

Trump's Payday Loans would be a definite target for an investigation.
So much fake, benign, and chronologically incorrect gobbledygook in there. You haven’t read anything but lefty nonsense on this. Just give a National Review article on this, any of them and see how shady the fix was put in against only side of the political aisle in this campaign.
 

Spamature

President
So much fake, benign, and chronologically incorrect gobbledygook in there. You haven’t read anything but lefty nonsense on this. Just give a National Review article on this, any of them and see how shady the fix was put in against only side of the political aisle in this campaign.
Give it to them. I debunk that bs all the time. In other words, go call your big brother. Nobody's scared of him anyway. He won't do any better than you are now.
 
Last edited:
If a bank got robbed and you were the police would you infiltrate their organization by placing spies in their bank board meetings and start indicting the board of directors for actions not involving the robbery?
That’s already been dismissed as false, by republicans, shrug.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
And you found out that there was this bank that was robbed. Yet the head of the bank not only refused to admit it had been robbed, but he also did what ever he could to foul up the police investigation into the crime.

Which bank you do think you and all the bank robbers around the world would pick as their next target ?
Are you talking about the Democrat mayor of Oakland, California?
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
And you found out that there was this bank that was robbed. Yet the head of the bank not only refused to admit it had been robbed, but he also did what ever he could to foul up the police investigation into the crime.

Which bank you do think you and all the bank robbers around the world would pick as their next target ?
So this is a metaphor for Obama giving the Iranians money for hostages saying it was for a deal which nobody signed.

We get it Obama was robbed and refused to admit he had been robbed and covered it up saying it was for a deal to end Iranian nukes, so which will they go after? The bank...err country that think Obama was good leadership. Maybe Sweden.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
And you found out that there was this bank that was robbed. Yet the head of the bank not only refused to admit it had been robbed, but he also did what ever he could to foul up the police investigation into the crime.

Which bank you do think you and all the bank robbers around the world would pick as their next target ?
The head of the US bank is dropping daisy cutters on fools like you, when it happens you will have no idea
 

Spamature

President
So this is a metaphor for Obama giving the Iranians money for hostages saying it was for a deal which nobody signed.

We get it Obama was robbed and refused to admit he had been robbed and covered it up saying it was for a deal to end Iranian nukes, so which will they go after? The bank...err country that think Obama was good leadership. Maybe Sweden.
No, Obama got the robbers to trade hostages for getting their own money, after an international courts said we had to give it back to them for nothing. That's leadership.
 

Spamature

President
The head of the US bank is dropping daisy cutters on fools like you, when it happens you will have no idea
I don't doubt that he plans to bomb his own country, nor that you wouldn't approve of such treason.

In for a penny, in for a pound, right ?
 
Last edited:
Top