What lead you to believe it was an inside job without a shred of evidence?
Imagine the other bank acrosss the street, Clinton First National was robbed multiple times but you only placed an informant in the other bank, wouldn’t that appear sketchy?
Who said there wasn't a shred of evidence ?
Yeah if you their was a suspicion that Trump's Payday Loans was involved with the robbers. You know like meeting up with the robbers in the hopes of getting some of the loot.
Or openly asking the robbers spread some of that loot around "if they are listening".
Or that having another investigation done by the lawyers for Clinton First National which independently produced evidence that explicitly says that the head of Trump's Payday Loans cooperated with the bank robbers.
In addition to said head of that company constantly praising the head of the robbery gang.
Or finding out that there were dozens of meetings during the robbery, between the top executives at Trump's Payday Loans and the robbery gang.
Or that the head of security was also on the payroll of the robbery gang.
Or the COO of Trump's Payday Loans was millions in debt to members of the robbery gang.
It appears sketchy alright. The probably cause just keeps piling up
Trump's Payday Loans would be a definite target for an investigation.