New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Thank God. Trump had the Secret Service pull Acosta's pass.

Love it. Love, love, love it!

Acosta cares more about his fellow Hispanics than he does his fellow American citizens. The number of Hispanics like that in America are many and are mostly socialists. That is true of many ethnic groups who care more about their ethnic kind than their citizen kind.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Love it. Love, love, love it!

Acosta cares more about his fellow Hispanics than he does his fellow American citizens. The number of Hispanics like that in America are many and are mostly socialists. That is true of many ethnic groups who care more about their ethnic kind than their citizen kind.
Good, journalists shouldn't be allowed to act as activists.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Love it. Love, love, love it!

Acosta cares more about his fellow Hispanics than he does his fellow American citizens. The number of Hispanics like that in America are many and are mostly socialists. That is true of many ethnic groups who care more about their ethnic kind than their citizen kind.
He's another political hack and comes across like a sanctimonious butt hole, he won't be missed
 
Last edited:

Spamature

President
Love it. Love, love, love it!

Acosta cares more about his fellow Hispanics than he does his fellow American citizens. The number of Hispanics like that in America are many and are mostly socialists. That is true of many ethnic groups who care more about their ethnic kind than their citizen kind.
No worries there will be plenty of Democratic press conferences that he can attend as they go through the process of rolling up the Trump crime family.

Beats Sarah and Trump's stale lying any day.

You know, once you've heard one YUGE Trump lie you've heard all 6000 of them.
 
Last edited:
No worries there will be plenty of Democratic press conferences that he can attend as they go through the process of rolling up the Trump crime family.

Beat Sarah and Trump's stale lying any day.

You know, once you've heard on YUGE Trump lie you've heard all 6000 of them.
Everybody is happy. I'm glad we started bipartisan like that. :0)
 

sear

Mayor
Thank God. Trump had the Secret Service pull Acosta's pass.

a) You lost me on the divine complicity angle.

b) What has the Secret Service to do with it?

c) It is axiomatic: don't start a wee-wee contest with any organization that buys ink by the barrel.

Pulling Acosta's white house press pass may be the most brilliant accomplishment of the entire Trump administration, past, present, and future.
But I suspect involving secret service may have been a blunder.

We shall see.
 
Thank God. Trump had the Secret Service pull Acosta's pass.

a) You lost me on the divine complicity angle.

b) What has the Secret Service to do with it?

c) It is axiomatic: don't start a wee-wee contest with any organization that buys ink by the barrel.

Pulling Acosta's white house press pass may be the most brilliant accomplishment of the entire Trump administration, past, present, and future.
But I suspect involving secret service may have been a blunder.

We shall see.
The Secret Service and the Capitol Police control physical access to the White House. Credentials to access the building go through them. After Acosta got violent inside the building, they removed his access. It was a good call.

He's not really a reporter, he's a protester, and as such, and given his propensity for violence, he's too dangerous to have inside the building.
 

sear

Mayor
"Acosta got violent" mm #10
a) I wasn't aware of that.

b) Define "violent".

c) You have an opinion. There is an opposing opinion. Which of the two opinions is valid would be determined in court of law. It ain't there yet.
 
a) I wasn't aware of that.
You should watch the video, then you'll be aware of it.

b) Define "violent".
Aggressively making physical contact with another person without their consent.

c) You have an opinion. There is an opposing opinion. Which of the two opinions is valid would be determined in court of law. It ain't there yet.
Not yet. I'm hoping she pursues an assault claim against the man who hit her. Having people like you out there shaming the victim isn't helping her, though.
 

4/15

Mayor
The freedom of the press shall not be abridged/infringed. Ever hear that before? tRump is one who should be banned.
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
The freedom of the press shall not be abridged/infringed. Ever hear that before? tRump is one who should be banned.
So, freedom of the press means a 'journalist' can disrupt press conferences, continue to hold the mike when the President tells him to drop it, become the story instead of the actual story? Really?THAT is what freedom of the press means to a moron like you????
 

sear

Mayor
"Aggressively making physical contact with another person without their consent." mm #13
If your contention is the female white house staffer aggressed against the male reporter, I acknowledge your position.
"Not yet. I'm hoping she pursues an assault claim against the man who hit her. Having people like you out there shaming the victim isn't helping her, though." mm #13
Perhaps we're referring to different incidents.
I saw the female reach across his body with her inside arm forcing body contact.
iirc the male reporter remained stationary, did not reposition his shoes on the floor.
If there was an aggressor it was the female.

Study law much?

BTW
At presidential news conferences, there's a long and revered journalistic tradition of follow-up questions. Trump denied him that.
Lemme guess. You're a Trump supporter?
 

sear

Mayor
"Is that really what you saw? You're taking the position that the woman was aggressive with Acosta?" mm #16
a) I didn't introduce the issue of aggression.
I responded to your comment on it. Otherwise I'd not have mentioned it / her.
But to deflect your accusation against him, I pointed out that her feet moved, his did not. And the notion of motionless aggression in this context is rather abstract.

b) What I saw didn't rise to the level of a scuffle, in my opinion. I don't know a COP in the country that would have given it the "BREAK IT UP" routine.

c) I deduce you're taking the partisan side of Trump.
Perhaps therefore because I question your interpretation that you assume I'm taking the other partisan side.
nope
I'm taking the side of the press.
I think to hold our government responsible we have to hold our politicians accountable. And one of the few ways the People have for that is the follow-up question.
Obviously Trump didn't want that, so Trump played the protocol card. Trump called the press rude.
You can't see through that? I'll bet you would have if President Hillary Clinton had done what Trump did.
But then, it's an absurd hypothetical. Hillary Clinton couldn't sink that low.
 
a) I didn't introduce the issue of aggression.
I responded to your comment on it. Otherwise I'd not have mentioned it / her.
But to deflect your accusation against him, I pointed out that her feet moved, his did not. And the notion of motionless aggression in this context is rather abstract.

b) What I saw didn't rise to the level of a scuffle, in my opinion. I don't know a COP in the country that would have given it the "BREAK IT UP" routine.

c) I deduce you're taking the partisan side of Trump.
Perhaps therefore because I question your interpretation that you assume I'm taking the other partisan side.
nope
I'm taking the side of the press.
I think to hold our government responsible we have to hold our politicians accountable. And one of the few ways the People have for that is the follow-up question.
Obviously Trump didn't want that, so Trump played the protocol card. Trump called the press rude.
You can't see through that? I'll bet you would have if President Hillary Clinton had done what Trump did.
But then, it's an absurd hypothetical. Hillary Clinton couldn't sink that low.
Hillary Clinton referred to 32 million Americans as "irredeemable". Do you know what that word means? What do you do with something that can't be redeemed?
 

sear

Mayor
"Do you know what that word means?" mm #19

irredeemable (îr´î-dê´me-bel) adjective
1. That cannot be bought back or paid off: an irredeemable annuity.
2. Not convertible into coin.
3. Impossible to remedy: irredeemable losses.
4. Impossible to redeem or reform: an irredeemable evil.
- ir´redeem´ably adverb *

"What do you do with something that can't be redeemed?" mm
Ask it if it wants fries with that?

* Excerpted from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.
 
Top