New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

What's the difference between a cold front and a POLAR VORTEX?

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
It also says that it is extremely likely that present-day warming is caused by human activity and that it is at least 10 times as rapid as the previous ice-age recovery warming.
Well then the math proves that wrong. That said u will never know.

Schitzos like u r fun, do you drool much
 

EatTheRich

President
20000 years ago half the USA and all of Canada were under 2000 feet of ice. The glacial maximum to an educated human. So u wood not know
Glad I could educate you about what it was called. Scientists inferred that the glacial maximum occurred using the same sorts of proxy evidence they used to infer rates of past warming.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Glad I could educate you about what it was called. Scientists inferred that the glacial maximum occurred using the same sorts of proxy evidence they used to infer rates of past warming.
Nope, the maximum is confirmed by glacial morains...

Did u study to be dumb
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Good point, the obvious answer is “none.”
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa so the imbecile does not understand that literally everything is mathematics. You think your climate scientist do not use math?

Imbecile is a complement to you
 

EatTheRich

President
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa so the imbecile does not understand that literally everything is mathematics. You think your climate scientist do not use math?

Imbecile is a complement to you
I understand that just fine. I also understand that there is no correct math using numbers derived from observations that refutes their conclusions.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
I understand that just fine. I also understand that there is no correct math using numbers derived from observations that refutes their conclusions.
Actually all mathematics of glacial melt data clearly discern that the world has been warming for 20ooo years and that humanity was not involved in this
 
Last edited:

redtide

Mayor
There are two separate phenomena ... the predicted, and confirmed, global warming ... and the chaotic effects of that warming that are grouped under the hallowed term “climate change.”
yeah yeah yeah, what will your cults next name change
 

EatTheRich

President
Actually all mathematics of glacial melt data clearly discern that the world has been warming for 20ooo years and that humanity was not involved in this
And the scientists have never denied this. Nor have I. But it doesn’t mean what you think it does.

Suppose you had proof that the house had been heating up all day because of the sun shining in through the windows. That wouldn’t prove that in the last 10 minutes you didn’t set the kitchen on fire, causing the house to suddenly become much hotter.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
And the scientists have never denied this. Nor have I. But it doesn’t mean what you think it does.

Suppose you had proof that the house had been heating up all day because of the sun shining in through the windows. That wouldn’t prove that in the last 10 minutes you didn’t set the kitchen on fire, causing the house to suddenly become much hotter.
I know who your new idol is

Two schizzos in a pod

 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
One consistent feature of these discussions: the vast majority of my posts are about evidence. The vast majority of your posts are about me or some celebrity.
You have never posted, nor could you post evidence that climate change would not be happening without humans. So kid you better get laid soon because the world ends in 12 years...……… Just like there is no longer any snow.

The fact is that I post reams of evidence. You just don't want to accept the truth that u r a sucker

 

EatTheRich

President
You have never posted, nor could you post evidence that climate change would not be happening without humans. So kid you better get laid soon because the world ends in 12 years...……… Just like there is no longer any snow.

The fact is that I post reams of evidence. You just don't want to accept the truth that u r a sucker

The question is not whether the climate would be changing without human action. As you have repeatedly condescendingly pointed out, although it had no bearing on the topic, it is trivially true that the climate is always changing.

But the evidence that the current climate change ... which (based on the geological record and on simple calculations about energy balance) is taking place at a rate that is extremely unusually rapid ... is caused by humans is plentiful, First, there is the known physical mechanism that ... if it is not causing accelerated greenhouse warming ... almost everything we know about physics, astronomy, and chemistry is wrong. Second, there is the fact that the current climate change was forecast in extremely accurate detail decades in advance, even though the forecast was for a huge departure from patterns that have held for hundreds or thousands of years. Third, there is the fact that no climate model that does not include anthropogenic forcings can be fit to the data.
 

redtide

Mayor
And the scientists have never denied this. Nor have I. But it doesn’t mean what you think it does.

Suppose you had proof that the house had been heating up all day because of the sun shining in through the windows. That wouldn’t prove that in the last 10 minutes you didn’t set the kitchen on fire, causing the house to suddenly become much hotter.
LOL, bu that is what your little sicko cult is asking of US along with our money
 

redtide

Mayor
One consistent feature of these discussions: the vast majority of my posts are about evidence. The vast majority of your posts are about me or some celebrity.
have yet to see anything other then you posting propaganda to back up your socialist and gorebal warming cultist agenda
 

EatTheRich

President
LOL, bu that is what your little sicko cult is asking of US along with our money
You can call the large majority of humanity who believe evidence over ideology a “little sicko cult” as many times as you want and it won’t change the evidence or the reality.
 

EatTheRich

President
have yet to see anything other then you posting propaganda to back up your socialist and gorebal warming cultist agenda
Sure, lucky for me (actually a consequence of basing my agenda on facts and not the other way around) facts are all the propaganda I need.
 
Top