What?!?!???? Republicans wouldn't lie us into war. They'd never do that.Sorry, but I’m not quite yet buying the narrative of Iran attacking tankers/pipeline that’s being pumped right now and the knee jerk motivation to move forces in response to it.
Maybe I’m a cautious old military guy, but something in this just doesn’t add up.
It’s just Trump “wagging the dog.”Sorry, but I’m not quite yet buying the narrative of Iran attacking tankers/pipeline that’s being pumped right now and the knee jerk motivation to move forces in response to it.
Maybe I’m a cautious old military guy, but something in this just doesn’t add up.
I think we just like to fight. And the military industrial complex likes to make money.
No this is Trump diverting the narrative, when in doubt start a war !It’s just Trump “wagging the dog.”
I agree, they said this morning that the chances of Trump READING the briefing were next to nothing and Bolton was spearheading this. There isn't a war he didn't like to say the least.I really doubt it is a Trump construct. I’d be more inclined to believe it’s the Saudis, another nation or our own government apparatus seeking to play us.
Hillaryous that you think this is a partisan issue.What?!?!???? Republicans wouldn't lie us into war. They'd never do that.
Bolton has always been too hawkish for my taste.I agree, they said this morning that the chances of Trump READING the briefing were next to nothing and Bolton was spearheading this. There isn't a war he didn't like to say the least.
Whos "they"?I agree, they said this morning that the chances of Trump READING the briefing were next to nothing and Bolton was spearheading this. There isn't a war he didn't like to say the least.
Whos "they"?Everybody.
You think Trump reads stuff?
;-)
A pointless war with Iran is very much a partisan issue at the moment.Hillaryous that you think this is a partisan issue.
And how about that great deal Trump reached with Iran after he breached the Obama era international nuke deal? So much better!A pointless war with Iran is very much a partisan issue at the moment.
I think its a contingency plan at best for a worst case scenario. The Times article can't even confirm if the President has been briefed on the idea.Sorry, but I’m not quite yet buying the narrative of Iran attacking tankers/pipeline that’s being pumped right now and the knee jerk motivation to move forces in response to it.
Maybe I’m a cautious old military guy, but something in this just doesn’t add up.
Saudis and the Israelis....and Bolton and Pompeo.I really doubt it is a Trump construct. I’d be more inclined to believe it’s the Saudis, another nation or our own government apparatus seeking to play us.