New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Time to give up on the collusion fantasy, folks.

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
It would be a sad way to be. It sounds like your way though. Not mine.
I am quite comfortable here. Always have been.

I have no patience for idiots. That's all.
I am guessing Trinnity hurt your widdle feewings. LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Haha, ask trinnity about me. She tried to bully me so I bullied her pretty bad. She won’t forget me...and doesn’t know I’m there or she’d try and ban me again. : )
 

Jen

Senator
Haha, ask trinnity about me. She tried to bully me so I bullied her pretty bad. She won’t forget me...and doesn’t know I’m there or she’d try and ban me again. : )
No. I really don't care enough about you to even remember to ask her.

I doubt you are even nearly as memorable as you think you are.

Kinda funny that you are still smarting from her lil slap though. That's cute.;)
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
No. I really don't care enough about you to even remember to ask her.

I doubt you are even nearly as memorable as you think you are.

Kinda funny that you are still smarting from her lil slap though. That's cute.;)
She and others still talk about me. I roughed her up pretty good. : )
 

Jen

Senator
And then she responded to your Lefty post.

Funny.
If foolish Lefty posts to me, I will probably respond. I don't open Lefty Troll top posts. You are a bit dumber than the rest........I didn't realize that was even possible.
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
why does anybody believe someone just quoting the summary of Mueller's Report is hyping collusion, and not just proving it actually happened at least 127 times? Since collusion is not against the law, just the Trumpies meeting in secret with russians knowing they had hacked DNC servers which is against the law, and knowing they wanted Trump to win as per Putin's orders, and there was coordination in leaking those hacked emails on wikileaks, IS OBVIOUS COLLUSION AS DEFINED BY A STANDARD DICTIONARY-

col·lu·sion
/kəˈlo͞oZHən/
noun
  1. secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
    "the armed forces were working in collusion with drug traffickers"
    synonyms: conspiracy, connivance, complicity, intrigue, plotting, secret understanding, collaboration, scheming
    "there has been collusion between the security forces and paramilitary groups"
No collusion no obstruction
 

kaz

Small l libertarian
why does anybody believe someone just quoting the summary of Mueller's Report is hyping collusion, and not just proving it actually happened at least 127 times? Since collusion is not against the law, just the Trumpies meeting in secret with russians knowing they had hacked DNC servers which is against the law, and knowing they wanted Trump to win as per Putin's orders, and there was coordination in leaking those hacked emails on wikileaks, IS OBVIOUS COLLUSION AS DEFINED BY A STANDARD DICTIONARY-

col·lu·sion
/kəˈlo͞oZHən/
noun
  1. secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
    "the armed forces were working in collusion with drug traffickers"
    synonyms: conspiracy, connivance, complicity, intrigue, plotting, secret understanding, collaboration, scheming
    "there has been collusion between the security forces and paramilitary groups"
"Meeting in secret." Everything is a conspiracy to you wackos. So he didn't put an add in the paper. Now we need to speak about it in hushed voices and call it "Meeting in secret."

Back to reality. It's reasonable and expected that President elects meet with other countries. Obama did it. You were fine with it then.

You're also fine with Hillary actually buying fake information from the Russians. And you're fine with using that fake information to get a warrant against her political opponent.

All you care about in any of this is whether there is an R or a D after their name
 

kaz

Small l libertarian
You haven't read the report have you?
Yes, you read a report where the authors of the report stated there was no evidence of collusion and you're jumping up and down yelling, we got em! We got em!

That while you don't care about Hillary actually paying the Russians for fake information and using it for a warrant.

You're a partisan schmuck
 

reason10

Governor
We have several threads started in the past few days saying "Well, what about this"..........."This lefty wrote an article about collusion"...yada.........yada...........yada.

It's over.

Mueller crushed your fantasy. He looked at all of it.

NO Collusion.

Hillary lost.

It really is time for you clowns to accept reality.
Actually, there WAS real collusion, but it was from a different party. And Attorney General Barr is actually doing his job and will expose the true colluders.
 

kaz

Small l libertarian
Actually, there WAS real collusion, but it was from a different party. And Attorney General Barr is actually doing his job and will expose the true colluders.
Yep. Democrats are in a blind search for justice, right? They think we should investigate how the investigation started so we can learn the truth. That's all they want, the truth!

Democrats and standards are like a fish flopping on the floor with a R painted on one side and a D on the other ...
 

FakeName

Governor
Yes, you read a report where the authors of the report stated there was no evidence of collusion and you're jumping up and down yelling, we got em! We got em!

That while you don't care about Hillary actually paying the Russians for fake information and using it for a warrant.

You're a partisan schmuck
No. The authors of the report did not state there was no evidence of collusion

Perhaps instead of constantly lying about what is in it you should actually read it so you know what is in it.
 

kaz

Small l libertarian
No. The authors of the report did not state there was no evidence of collusion

Perhaps instead of constantly lying about what is in it you should actually read it so you know what is in it.
Yes, you know better than the authors of the Mueller report what they found. Sure you do, Speed Racer.

At this point, you're proving that you are just a liar. I've shown you over and over how it was phrased. You don't care about the truth since you just keep repeatedly brushing it off.

And if you cared about patriotism or the truth, then you would hold Hillary accountable for actually paying for fake Russian intelligence and using it for a warrant, which is worse than what Trump is even accused of doing by his deeply partisan political enemies trying to overturn an election.

But no, you brush off what isn't in dispute and keep referring to a report saying the people who wrote it don't know what they found. Partisan hack, thy name is FakeName. Who is one with Fake News
 

FakeName

Governor
Yes, you know better than the authors of the Mueller report what they found. Sure you do, Speed Racer.
I know what the authors of the report found because I read the report they wrote.

Which is more than you can say. You keep lying about what they found (more likely you are just repeating lies you were told about what they found, because you haven't bothered to read it yourself).

As funny as it is having someone trying to carry on an argument with me about a report you admit you haven't read, I am starting to get embarrassed for you. You are making a total fool of yourself.

Read the report first.
 

kaz

Small l libertarian
I know what the authors of the report found because I read the report they wrote.

Which is more than you can say. You keep lying about what they found (more likely you are just repeating lies you were told about what they found, because you haven't bothered to read it yourself).

As funny as it is having someone trying to carry on an argument with me about a report you admit you haven't read, I am starting to get embarrassed for you. You are making a total fool of yourself.

Read the report first.
Funny stuff. You could read a book titled, "The Butler Did It" and come away convinced it was the maid.

That you know better than the Mueller team who WROTE the Mueller Report what the Mueller Report says the Mueller team found is just ... so ... you ...
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
ONE MORE TIME...directly from the Mueller Report summary as linked...have someone you trust read it and try to explain it to you so you can quit embarrassing yourself because you still somehow believe the Report exonerates trump and his cronies from collusion with russians...

RUSSIAN HACKING OPERATIONS

At the same time that the IRA operation began to focus on supporting candidate Trump in early 2016, the Russian government employed a second form of interference: cyber intrusions (hacking) and releases of hacked materials damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The Russian intelligence service known as the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Army (GRU) carried out these operations.

In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. In April 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks. Around the time that the DNC announced in mid-June 2016 the Russian government's role in hacking its network, the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0." The GRU later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks.

The presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign" or "Campaign") showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton. Beginning in June 2016, [Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter] forecast to senior Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton. WikiLeaks's first release came in July 2016. Around the same time, candidate Trump announced that he hoped Russia would recover emails described as missing from a private server used by Clinton when she was Secretary of State. [Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter] WikiLeaks began releasing Podesta’s stolen emails on October 7, 2016, less than one hour after a U.S. media outlet released video considered damaging to candidate Trump. Section III of this Report details the Office's investigation into the Russian hacking operations, as well as other efforts by Trump Campaign supporters to obtain Clinton-related email.

The Russian contacts consisted of business connections, offers of assistance to the Campaign, invitations for candidate Trump and Putin to meet in person, invitations for Campaign officials and representatives of the Russian government to meet, and policy positions seeking improved U.S.-Russian relations. Section IV of this Report details the contacts between Russia and the Trump Campaign during the campaign and transition periods, the most salient of which are summarized below in chronological order.

2015. Some of the earliest contacts were made in connection with a Trump Organization real-estate project in Russia known as Trump Tower Moscow. Candidate Trump signed a Letter of Intent for Trump Tower Moscow by November 2015, and in January 2016 Trump Organization executive Michael Cohen emailed and spoke about the project with the office of Russian government press secretary Dmitry Peskov. The Trump Organization pursued the project through at least June 2016, including by considering travel to Russia by Cohen and candidate Trump.

Spring 2016. Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos made early contact with Joseph Mifsud, a London-based professor who had connections to Russia and traveled to Moscow in April 2016. Immediately upon his return to London from that trip, Mifsud told Papadopoulos that the Russian government had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later, in the first week of May 2016, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to candidate Clinton. Throughout that period of time and for several months thereafter, Papadopoulos worked with Mifsud and two Russian nationals to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and the Russian government.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/full-text-mueller-reports-executive-summaries
You are seriously suggesting we should rely on the veracity of Mueller in this matter?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-15/barrs-investigator-john-durham-once-probed-mueller-shocking-case


I want to SEE the proof. I'm not taking Mueller's word for any of this...
 
Top