New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Real Science on 9th planet outs the Cassini hoax

Days

Commentator
Cassini orbit not influenced by phantom planet (Link)

Recently, a team of French scientists did a myriad of calculations on the orbits of the solar system objects and came to the mathematical conclusion that there was a 9th planet, ten times the mass of the earth, with a very large eliptical orbit of 10,000 to 20,000 earth years... all of it outside of the cluster of eight planets we all know about.

The body of work on the 9th planet is more than compelling, it is settled science, the planet is out there, it has more proof than any other planet we have "discovered" in the galaxy (beyond our solar system). There's no debate happening, it is universally accepted by the world of astronomy. This particular science project rivals Einsteinn's theories and really passes most of them in terms of the volume of math they performed. I don't know if you want to think of it in terms of Maxwell's math, because that guy was so brilliant, but we are talking about math on this level and historically relevant to this degree.

Now, here's the slip. These guys know Cassini is a hoax. Heck, I know Cassini is a hoax. NASA is composing telescopic data and presenting it as returned images from Cassini. So, for whatever reason, the French team of scientists decided to take a poke at NASA, this is in today's news (see Link above). So the French team ask NASA for data on Cassini's orbit, because the 9th planet should be affecting Cassini also..... POW! crash! BAM! SOCK! PFFFT!!!!!! ...... ouch Batman, that's gotta hurt.

Of course, NASA has nothing because Cassini is a hoax, so they pull one of their patented denials of reality. (think Apollo hoax denial: there is no radioactivity in space) What else could they do? They have no orbital data, they have no probe, all they have is a hoax. So NASA responds,
"Nope, no 9th planet influence on Cassini, maybe you guys need to revamp your math?" RIGHT ... "No relativity happening here, maybe Einsteinn got it wrong?" .... "Radiation? What Radiation? There's no radiation at solar maximum."

The more I read from NASA the more credence I have to give to the flat earthers. Maybe the sun really is 3500 miles away from earth and is just a big spotlight that the gods push around the sky. Unless you prefer NASA's version of the sun which was also a big spotlight, but was a mere 1000 feet away from the props in the desert. If I have to choose between the two, I'm going with the 3500 miles.

There really is a 9th planet, spotting it is going to take a herculean task or the luckiest spotting in history. But the math is not going away, never mind the bs happening at NASA.
NASA: Not Actually Science Anyway
 
Last edited:

Days

Commentator
If you desperately do not want to believe that God can create life, then why are you so willing to swallow that life came from other planets (Nebiru?) or stars (Orion?)... and duh, how did life get started in the stars, then? What the heck? You reject life from God (which is just another way of saying life from a source of life) as too far fetched, but you buy into a far more convoluted concept that life came from the stars and it still begs the question; how did life get started in the stars?

Ancient man had higher technology than what we have today. If they managed to preserve some of that technology, and pass it on to the hunter gatherers that recovered from the floods, of course the cavemen turned global power are going to look at things like flying saucers and figure these folk for gods. But the Nazis figured out how to build the saucers, out of earth materials, and the tiny craft are not suited to space travel. Just because there could be billions of possible "earths" out there, some where, doesn't mean there is life on any of them. And life doesn't "evolve" into higher forms of life, that's always been nonsense with no basis in the real world. The only way to evolve life into higher forms is through a creator of life building the finished product. Our tinkering with genetics is not the same; try to build a tiger from scratch, using just dirt. good luck with that.

We have found two other possible planets in our solar system, one is smallish, like Pluto, the other is way the hell out there. The planet Nebiru (planet of the crossing) could be a reference to that planet. But there is no accompanying dwarf star, just the planet. Think, if there was a star, everyone and their little sister would have pictures of it on YouTube by now, an amateur telescope should have no problem finding a bloody star on the outskirts of our solar system. So, this planet is colder than Pluto, so please, stop pretending it has intelligent life on it. Unless we all came from ice gods.

If ancient Babylon did a lot of commerce with commercial fishermen, which we know it did, how would you depict the agents for the fishermen? These guys , no doubt, came to the rulers of Babylon and made trade agreements to bring the riches of the Sea into the city. This would be very important aspect to the economy and food supply to the empire, the larger it got, the more important the trade agreements became. So, in the reliefs, we see guys wearing a fish, carrying a purse, and trading with the agents for the city. Makes sense to me. Why does that have to be a genetic cross breed between fish and men? And if it was supposed to be a murman, why the feet? And if it was genetics that built the giants (again, so desperate to not believe in angels, we create beings with mastery over genetics; why couldn't the genetics just be a result of the angels?) and it was those genetics that was used to build a genetic mutation between fish and men, why weren't these fishmen giants? God forbid they were just fish agents trading with the city.

We built these giant telescopes all over the world. Then NASA did all these hoax missions, missions that for one reason or the other, were not real, but it gave an outlet for the images and data collected by all the observatories. So we get a mix; real science and flat out hoaxes, it is a package deal. Just because the word "firmament" can also be translated "dome" doesn't prove the Bible says the world is flat. The prophet Isaiah said God sits on the circle of the earth. Don't go looking in Google earth for the indentation of God's ass on the earth somewhere. And "firmament" can also be translated "atmosphere". What I'm saying is, we have to weed through the hoaxes and the science, same for history, we look at the main stream thought and we look at the evidence the main stream is ignoring, but if you start out with your own concept that the moon is an alien base, you are worse than NASA. Anyone who has done survey work (I have) knows the earth is round. I'm willing to believe in lots of variations of life forms, because we see that all over the earth, that's what lives here, but there's no reason to conclude that life forms can be built out of rocks or lightening or stardust... anything is possible, but that doesn't make it probable. I don't see any reason to belittle people for being imaginative, we all have our fantasies, but I try to separate mine from scientific observation.
 
Last edited:

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
If you desperately do not want to believe that God can create life, then why are you so willing to swallow that life came from other planets (Nebiru?) or stars (Orion?)... and duh, how did life get started in the stars, then? What the heck? You reject life from God (which is just another way of saying life from a source of life) as too far fetched, but you buy into a far more convoluted concept that life came from the stars and it still begs the question; how did life get started in the stars?

Ancient man had higher technology than what we have today. If they managed to preserve some of that technology, and pass it on to the hunter gatherers that recovered from the floods, of course the cavemen turned global power are going to look at things like flying saucers and figure these folk for gods. But the Nazis figured out how to build the saucers, out of earth materials, and the tiny craft are not suited to space travel. Just because there could be billions of possible "earths" out there, some where, doesn't mean there is life on any of them. And life doesn't "evolve" into higher forms of life, that's always been nonsense with no basis in the real world. The only way to evolve life into higher forms is through a creator of life building the finished product. Our tinkering with genetics is not the same; try to build a tiger from scratch, using just dirt. good luck with that.

We have found two other possible planets in our solar system, one is smallish, like Pluto, the other is way the hell out there. The planet Nebiru (planet of the crossing) could be a reference to that planet. But there is no accompanying dwarf star, just the planet. Think, if there was a star, everyone and their little sister would have pictures of it on YouTube by now, an amateur telescope should have no problem finding a bloody star on the outskirts of our solar system. So, this planet is colder than Pluto, so please, stop pretending it has intelligent life on it. Unless we all came from ice gods.

If ancient Babylon did a lot of commerce with commercial fishermen, which we know it did, how would you depict the agents for the fishermen? These guys , no doubt, came to the rulers of Babylon and made trade agreements to bring the riches of the Sea into the city. This would be very important aspect to the economy and food supply to the empire, the larger it got, the more important the trade agreements became. So, in the reliefs, we see guys wearing a fish, carrying a purse, and trading with the agents for the city. Makes sense to me. Why does that have to be a genetic cross breed between fish and men? And if it was supposed to be a murman, why the feet? And if it was genetics that built the giants (again, so desperate to not believe in angels, we create beings with mastery over genetics; why couldn't the genetics just be a result of the angels?) and it was those genetics that was used to build a genetic mutation between fish and men, why weren't these fishmen giants? God forbid they were just fish agents trading with the city.

We built these giant telescopes all over the world. Then NASA did all these hoax missions, missions that for one reason or the other, were not real, but it gave an outlet for the images and data collected by all the observatories. So we get a mix; real science and flat out hoaxes, it is a package deal. Just because the word "firmament" can also be translated "dome" doesn't prove the Bible says the world is flat. The prophet Isaiah said God sits on the circle of the earth. Don't go looking in Google earth for the indentation of God's ass on the earth somewhere. And "firmament" can also be translated "atmosphere". What I'm saying is, we have to weed through the hoaxes and the science, same for history, we look at the main stream thought and we look at the evidence the main stream is ignoring, but if you start out with your own concept that the moon is an alien base, you are worse than NASA. Anyone who has done survey work (I have) knows the earth is round. I'm willing to believe in lots of variations of life forms, because we see that all over the earth, that's what lives here, but there's no reason to conclude that life forms can be built out of rocks or lightening or stardust... anything is possible, but that doesn't make it probable. I don't see any reason to belittle people for being imaginative, we all have our fantasies, but I try to separate mine from scientific observation.
Holy shit
 

Days

Commentator
Holy shit
get you up to speed....

Aftershock: The Ancient Cataclysm That Erased Human History

Brien Foerster
Premiered Feb 7, 2019


The book is available here: https://www.amazon.com/Aftershock-Anc... Dr. Paul LaViolette has just contacted me and said that the pulsar idea is not correct; my apologies to him. 'First of all, I never have said that the Galactic core is a pulsar. You’re saying that. Is there some way you can correct that because it sounds very crazy to me. In my opinion the Galactic core is a “mother star”. To understand what a mother star is, you need to read my other books and understand subquantum kinetics. The core spontaneously generates energy internally which is why it does not collapse.

Also you left out the most important part of my theory, the solar outburst or nova. The superwave only triggers the event. Most of the damage is done by the Sun. The superwave pushes dust into the solar system, which in turn aggravates the Sun, which in turn flares periodically to cause such disasters. There are many other energy effects, spectrum changes, etc. involved as well, all of which are explained in my books.'


....and then there's tens of thousands of ancient mines, cut out with lasers; all over the planet. Here is video of one in Egypt...

Exploration Deep Into the Tunnels And Tombs Of The Valley Of The Kings In Egypt

Brien Foerster

Premiered May 20, 2019
 
Last edited:

Days

Commentator
If you desperately do not want to believe that God can create life, then why are you so willing to swallow that life came from other planets (Nebiru?) or stars (Orion?)... and duh, how did life get started in the stars, then? What the heck? You reject life from God (which is just another way of saying life from a source of life) as too far fetched, but you buy into a far more convoluted concept that life came from the stars and it still begs the question; how did life get started in the stars?

Ancient man had higher technology than what we have today. If they managed to preserve some of that technology, and pass it on to the hunter gatherers that recovered from the floods, of course the cavemen turned global power are going to look at things like flying saucers and figure these folk for gods. But the Nazis figured out how to build the saucers, out of earth materials, and the tiny craft are not suited to space travel. Just because there could be billions of possible "earths" out there, some where, doesn't mean there is life on any of them. And life doesn't "evolve" into higher forms of life, that's always been nonsense with no basis in the real world. The only way to evolve life into higher forms is through a creator of life building the finished product. Our tinkering with genetics is not the same; try to build a tiger from scratch, using just dirt. good luck with that.

We have found two other possible planets in our solar system, one is smallish, like Pluto, the other is way the hell out there. The planet Nebiru (planet of the crossing) could be a reference to that planet. But there is no accompanying dwarf star, just the planet. Think, if there was a star, everyone and their little sister would have pictures of it on YouTube by now, an amateur telescope should have no problem finding a bloody star on the outskirts of our solar system. So, this planet is colder than Pluto, so please, stop pretending it has intelligent life on it. Unless we all came from ice gods.

If ancient Babylon did a lot of commerce with commercial fishermen, which we know it did, how would you depict the agents for the fishermen? These guys , no doubt, came to the rulers of Babylon and made trade agreements to bring the riches of the Sea into the city. This would be very important aspect to the economy and food supply to the empire, the larger it got, the more important the trade agreements became. So, in the reliefs, we see guys wearing a fish, carrying a purse, and trading with the agents for the city. Makes sense to me. Why does that have to be a genetic cross breed between fish and men? And if it was supposed to be a murman, why the feet? And if it was genetics that built the giants (again, so desperate to not believe in angels, we create beings with mastery over genetics; why couldn't the genetics just be a result of the angels?) and it was those genetics that was used to build a genetic mutation between fish and men, why weren't these fishmen giants? God forbid they were just fish agents trading with the city.

We built these giant telescopes all over the world. Then NASA did all these hoax missions, missions that for one reason or the other, were not real, but it gave an outlet for the images and data collected by all the observatories. So we get a mix; real science and flat out hoaxes, it is a package deal. Just because the word "firmament" can also be translated "dome" doesn't prove the Bible says the world is flat. The prophet Isaiah said God sits on the circle of the earth. Don't go looking in Google earth for the indentation of God's ass on the earth somewhere. And "firmament" can also be translated "atmosphere". What I'm saying is, we have to weed through the hoaxes and the science, same for history, we look at the main stream thought and we look at the evidence the main stream is ignoring, but if you start out with your own concept that the moon is an alien base, you are worse than NASA. Anyone who has done survey work (I have) knows the earth is round. I'm willing to believe in lots of variations of life forms, because we see that all over the earth, that's what lives here, but there's no reason to conclude that life forms can be built out of rocks or lightening or stardust... anything is possible, but that doesn't make it probable. I don't see any reason to belittle people for being imaginative, we all have our fantasies, but I try to separate mine from scientific observation.
I'm not trying to push a new interpretation for the fish gods of Sumeria, I'm trying to push around all the answers academia has given us for the history of the planet that predates history; 6000 years and beyond. At the same time, I'm questioning the idea that the gods of old had to come from other stars. On the one hand, it sickens me to see all this blatant evidence of high technology completely ignored, while on the other hand it sickens me even more to see these leaps of faith into far-fetched theories that make no sense. Why can't we think straight? Why is modern man so incapable of common sense? When John Anthony West showed pics of the base of the Sphinx to geologists, everyone of them said it was water damage, obviously... but when he revealed it was the Sphinx, they all backed away from it, because academia can not handle the truth, and everyone knows it.

Yes, the Nazis built flying saucers. They actually tapped into a local physicist who figured out that if you pump mercury in a fast tight rotation it creates a vertical lift. The materials used come from earth, the people building them were born here, so why are flying saucers thought of as extra-terrestrial? stupid. At the same time you have these internet trolls who deny everything and anything that is a military secret, but why should we listen to them? All they do is lie. That's their job. Middleview is a perfect example. I show the guy a frame from a video taken by the local reporters in DC that shows the impact area of the Pentagon wall on 09/11 and there is nothing there, not just no 757, nothing whatsoever, just the Pentagon and a lot of fire, but not so much as a single tech screw, nothing but sidewalk and wall, and Middleview looks at the pic and says he can see a 757... why listen to a liar like that? The military keeps secrets, they do that by lying; 'nuff said.

So, look at this video, look at all these people that walk into this ancient mine and all they see is the heiroglyphs that the dynastic Egyptians covered the walls with. They don't think twice that they are walking into laser cut mines...


The dynastic Egyptians were the world's first grafiti artists. How did they get every last heiroglyph so perfect? With copper chisels? Doesn't it seem like they had stamps? They have these glyphs running 50 feet up walls and pillars and on ceilings and every last one of them is perfect, there are millions of glyphs throughout Egypt, all perfectly spaced, all perfectly formed, and all exactly uniform, but no one claims they were formed by stamps, the dynastic Egyptians had no stamps, all these glyphs were chiseled out by artisan slaves with rocks and copper chisels... over generations, in every crazy location imaginable, often in pitch darkness, and every last one of them is uniform, the same exact impression for the same glyph over and over and over and over tens of thousands of times for every single one of those glyphs, but there was no stamp, afterall, we have no stamps, and it is an iron-clad rule that ancient man built everything without power tools or even stamps... if they had language and they had the ability to write things down, they would have definitely needed stamps, to form their writing, that is like saying ancient artists didn't have any brushes, they painted everything with sticks and reeds... academia just refuses to admit that there was any intelligence there, these were hunter-gatherers, there was never any intelligence, mankind was hatched under a rock, he was as stupid as the animals, because academia says so... never mind that copper chisels have a hardness of 3.5 while rose granite and black basalt have a hardness of 7... that it wasn't even possible to chisel into that rock, never mind common sense, nope we have to all be dolts and believe their nonsense, because they say so, and they are the high priests of intelligence, they have a license to be stupid.

So, yeah, I question the non-sense, no matter the source.
 
Last edited:

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
get you up to speed....

Aftershock: The Ancient Cataclysm That Erased Human History

Brien Foerster
Premiered Feb 7, 2019


The book is available here: https://www.amazon.com/Aftershock-Anc... Dr. Paul LaViolette has just contacted me and said that the pulsar idea is not correct; my apologies to him. 'First of all, I never have said that the Galactic core is a pulsar. You’re saying that. Is there some way you can correct that because it sounds very crazy to me. In my opinion the Galactic core is a “mother star”. To understand what a mother star is, you need to read my other books and understand subquantum kinetics. The core spontaneously generates energy internally which is why it does not collapse.

Also you left out the most important part of my theory, the solar outburst or nova. The superwave only triggers the event. Most of the damage is done by the Sun. The superwave pushes dust into the solar system, which in turn aggravates the Sun, which in turn flares periodically to cause such disasters. There are many other energy effects, spectrum changes, etc. involved as well, all of which are explained in my books.'


....and then there's tens of thousands of ancient mines, cut out with lasers; all over the planet. Here is video of one in Egypt...

Exploration Deep Into the Tunnels And Tombs Of The Valley Of The Kings In Egypt

Brien Foerster

Premiered May 20, 2019
Holy [Unwelcome language removed] shit
 
Top