No he had not.
Mid-November through December 19, 2016.....
Blah, blah, blah. Why are you continuing with this nonsense? A Presidential candidate is not the same as the President-elect. The victimized spouse of someone being under investigation is not the same as the actual individual being under investigation. A public investigation that everyone knows about (like Clinton emails) is not the same as Michael Flynn's. These instances are not remotely similar. Yet, in your low IQ fit you've tried to argue they are. This is why you are a laughing stock on this forum. Low IQ Putz.
Lulz
With Flynn and Kushner trying to set up communication inside the Russian embassy in order to hide their activities from US intelligence. Tipping off Trump would be tipping off Flynn and his cohorts.
Damn, your IQ is certainly low. You are still arguing those BASIC FACTS. Lulz
So, you think they were traveling to the Russian embassy now? ROFL. You get dumber by the post. And U.S. intelligence? Shouldn't U.S. intelligence be trying to PROTECT the communications of the transition team? The policitized Obama DOJ was committing crimes left and right by leaking to the press (like Flynn's perfectly legal conversations). Flynn and Kushner did nothing wrong. They did what they were suppose to. The Obama DOJ broke the law by releasing those private classified conversations to the media. Facts do matter.
Obama surely should not have tipped Trump off.
Because he and his DOJ were corrupt and incompetent? Surely the President-elect should know about his national security adviser. Unless of course they are engaging in politically motivated coverups and witch hunts. Then they wouldn't......
Trump should have performed proper vetting.
He can't vet anyone without getting proper FBI feedback. Jesus Christ, this is the ENTIRE point. Lulz
Yates came forward when she observed a crime being committed by Flynn. It was likely a crime Trump knew Flynn was committing. Because it was likely Flynn doing Trump's bidding by contacting the Russians after the sanctions and the keep that hidden. Now if Trump was willing to let a crime slide, he was surely not worried about an investigation into other suspected activities.
Flynn was committing no crime by talking about sanctions with Kislyak during the transition. That's what the transition team does. Flynn got into problems when he lied to Pence and the FBI about it. The crime committed was when Obama's corrupt DOJ leaked those conversations to the press. Why was Yates trying to pursue bogus Logan Act job on Flynn while ignoring the corruption on her own department? Obama and his DOJ were the epitome of evil.
Here is how you know when a excuse has reached its end. When you trying to point to someone else's dirty deeds in order to justify the dirty deeds of those you are defending . The facts is we are talking about what Trump did.
If it was as black and white as you are saying then it'd be an easy call. I'm telling you why Democrats in Congress have dropped it like a hot potato and it is now a dead issue. You have a difficult time with that.
Facts matter. psychosis does not.
.
And that somehow makes his less guilty of the crime he plead to ?
See my post to EatHisOwnDung above. Game. Set. Match.
Wake up, dummy.
He said that only included the actual hacking and the attacks launched by the IRA.
Mueller also suggested that an investigation by the FBI might turn up a different story on whether or not there was cooperation between the two.
Mueller WAS the 2 year unlimited FBI investigation you low IQ POS. ROFL!!!!! Mueller didn't say anything about a "different story". He said the President might have believed his perfectly legal actions were illegal based upon wailing going on.
Christ almighty, you're an idiot.
And you wonder why your part of the electorate consists of the low IQ, mentally ill, criminals, and miscreants? Facts completely evade your pea brains. Lulz
Again, this is meaningless because he did not, live or attend high school. or solely do his drinking, in Maryland, nor was he being asked about his drinking or behavior in Maryland.
He wasn't legal to drink on school property either way so where he went to school was meaningless. Most of the students in his school were from Washington DC. Most of the parties were in D.C. It was legal to drink there for his entire time in high school.....and most of high school in Maryland. Here is his quote AGAIN because you still can't grasp it:
"My friends and I sometimes got together and had parties on weekends. The drinking age was 18 in Maryland for most of my time in high school and was 18 in D.C. for all of my time in high school. I drank beer with my friends. Almost everyone did. Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer."
Good God, you dung for brains dullard. Lulz
He was not being question about his activities in DC.
True. Because he detailed in his OPENING statement. He had not been asked a single question about it and he made it clear as day:
"My friends and I sometimes got together and had parties on weekends. The drinking age was 18 in Maryland for most of my time in high school and was 18 in D.C. for all of my time in high school. I drank beer with my friends. Almost everyone did. Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer."
I'll help you along a little bit. What happened on July 1, 1982 does NOT matter on location. The same people who could drink in Washington DC on July 1, 1982 could drink in Maryland on July 1, 1982. Those who couldn't drink in DC on July 1, 1982 couldn't drink in Maryland on July 1, 1982.
The Maryland law went into effect on July 1, 1982. Those who were ALREADY 18 by July 1, 1982 were still legal to drink. They were grandfathered in because you really can't say "you're legal now.....but you won't be in 2 weeks". Therefore, if someone was 18 years old on July 1, 1982 they were STILL legal in Maryland. And they were legal in D.C. Yet, you posted a an-alt left propaganda pic which pretended like this wasn't true and you competely fell for it!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahah. Christ, you must be mentally retarded. There can be other explanation for this idiocy, right? There are freaks in your electorate.
Lulz