You're the pretender here. You are pretending this is just about "participation" when the fact that you are aligned with all of the America hating, open border loving, free stuff radical leftists on this issue tells us all we need to know about what this is, well about.
I'd like to minimize the effort to normalize illegal immigration. I'd like to minimize the rush to even bigger levels of wealth redistribution. I'd like to minimize the big government authoritarianism that a popularly elected President will only put on steroids.
I read an interesting piece by the inestimable Hunter S. Thompson, that I had long ago forgotten, about the futility of the election process that favors the two parties and forces us to vote for the lessor of two evils.
That’s the real issue this time,” he said. “Beating Nixon. It’s hard to even guess how much damage those bastards will do if they get in for another four years.”
The argument was familiar, I had even made it myself, here and there, but I was beginning to sense something very depressing about it. How many more of these goddamn elections are we going to have to write off as lame, but “regrettably necessary” holding actions? And how many more of these stinking double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote for something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?
Now with another one of these big bogus showdowns looming down on us, I can already pick up the stench of another bummer. I understand, along with a lot of other people, that the big thing this year is Beating Nixon. But that was also the big thing, as I recall, twelve years ago in 1960 – and as far as I can tell, we’ve gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.
—Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ’72
As usual with his stuff it struck a cord and seemed instantly profound. I suddenly found myself leaning toward the popular vote argument. Then it dawned on me - that was then, this is now. The people who he tends to agree with (I know because it includes me) still only number about 20 million (if that), while the left wing communists have tripled in number and the war mongering greed heads on the right have doubled. People like HST (and me) aren't winning the demographic (or ideological) war here (and never were). Of course he was correct about the righteousness of the libertarians. Of course he was 100% correct about the uncompromising corruption of the two party system. But unfortunately, giving veto power to one of them (especially the left) is actually worse than his dystopian depiction of the status quo.