New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

"Europe is for Europeans"

RickWA

Snagglesooth
Nope. They do not need to seek asylum in the first safe country. That is made up BS. Where do you people get that?

It isn't true.
Now that you have made it quite clear that safety and security of these “asylum seekers” is not your goal, perhaps you should fess up on what is. Right?

(And, yes, the UN has defined asylum). I must admit, though, it’s kinda cool to FINALLY see you commies turn on the UN as well.

The cockeyed crackpot, swirling socialist piranha can’t even manage this simple orbit. :-/

Now, the UN is not “woke”.
 

FakeName

Governor
Now that you have made it quite clear that safety and security of these “asylum seekers” is not your goal, perhaps you should fess up on what is. Right?

(And, yes, the UN has defined asylum). I must admit, though, it’s kinda cool to FINALLY see you commies turn on the UN as well.

The cockeyed crackpot, swirling socialist piranha can’t even manage this simple orbit. :-/

Now, the UN is not “woke”.
The UN does not define american law.

Fact: American law DOES NOT say that they need to apply in the first safe country.

US law does say that they have a right to turn themselves in to US border patrol to request asylum no matter where
they come from. US law even says they can apply here even after entering illegally.

Why not refer to US law?
 
Last edited:
No, organize. Encourage interethnic and interconfessional fraternization. Fight for unions and a labor party that fights for the rights of all. Educate against religious prejudices and sexist attitudes. Build solidarity by supporting the struggles of people in places like Pakistan before they start relocating to Liverpool.
Here we are Savile Town nr Dewsbury -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3899540/Go-away-shouldn-t-Don-t-come-corner-Yorkshire-no-white-residents.html

Bradford

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575402/I-feel-like-an-alien-in-my-home-town.html

I shan't do the East End of London, too many articles to choose from --- but it is next because Muslims are not integrating.
 
Why do they work for less money? Because they are discriminated against. Why don’t they join the union? Because they are discriminated against.
They refuse to integrate and the violence is growing where communities are diverse as opposed to homogenized


And it is getting worse
 

now_what

Governor
Supporting Member
Yes, most of it is. Ever check the USA and Canada retirement communities there?

Much of Mexico is safe. Just like much of the USA is safe.

You should travel more.
Retirement communities...LOL. Of course parts of Mexico are safe, but too much of it is not. Corruption is widespread. There is also little opportunity for foreign people to get assistance, as most of the country is poor. The southern states are some of the poorest. I think you know the border cities with the US are some of the most dangerous in the world and Mexico City has many problems, even in the outskirts.

We are building a house in Costa Rica, I travel internationally about once a quarter between pleasure and work, occasionally more. : )
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
A complete lack of restraint= the definition of freedom.
Moses said to Pharaoh: "Thus says the Lord, 'Let My people that they my serve Me.'"

Not 'Let My people go that they may do whatever they feel like without any restraint.'

A complete lack of restraint isn't freedom. A complete lack of restraint is chaos, selfishness, arrogance, and stupidity.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
The only thing the rich fear is the unity of poor people of all races and nationalities.
They fear the unity of poor & working class White men, the only people with the will and the ability to re-make the system. The "rich" (not those who used their talents and abilities to earn millions but those who have billions without ever doing anything of real value) know that miscegenated masses won't have the drive or intelligence or unity needed to create a just world.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
This needs to change and it would be simple enough to fix. There should either be facilities in Mexico, near the U.S. border, or in a safe area between the borders, where they could request asylum and get a decision in a reasonable amount of time. Then, if granted asylum, they could be moved to facilities in the country and kept until it could be determined where they would relocate and what financial help they would get to settle in to life in The United States.
Those not granted asylum would not be permitted to enter the U.S.
Simpler fix: Since most "asylum seekers" aren't seeking asylum but rather seeking money, we stop accepting any "asylum seekers."
 

FakeName

Governor
Simpler fix: Since most "asylum seekers" aren't seeking asylum but rather seeking money, we stop accepting any "asylum seekers."
No most of them are seeking asylum.

And you are Nazi. People should know that when they read your propaganda.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
No most of them are seeking asylum.
No, most of them are claiming asylum to get in (to the USA -- for the EU they don't have to bother with the pretense). They're seeking money.

And you are Nazi. People should know that when they read your propaganda.
They do; it's not a secret. I've always been open and honest about it.
(Look at my avatar. Read my signature. I practically advertise it. God bless America.)
Also about my views on immigration.

Expressing one's opinion isn't propaganda.
 

FakeName

Governor
No, most of them are claiming asylum to get in (to the USA -- for the EU they don't have to bother with the pretense). They're seeking money.


They do; it's not a secret. I've always been open and honest about it.
(Look at my avatar. Read my signature. I practically advertise it. God bless America.)
Also about my views on immigration.

Expressing one's opinion isn't propaganda.
No, most of them are seeking asylum.

Lie all you want, you are a nazi, lying is part of the design, but it doesn't change the facts.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
No, most of them are seeking asylum.
Nope.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/80-percent-of-asylum-cases-at-southwest-border-arent-legitimate-dhs-chief-says
https://thefederalist.com/2018/04/09/data-indicates-illegal-immigrants-exploiting-u-s-asylum-policies-false-claims/
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/09/28/652218318/thousands-could-be-deported-as-government-targets-asylum-mills-clients

Lie all you want, you are a nazi, lying is part of the design, but it doesn't change the facts.
I don't lie. Either prove that I knowingly propagated a falsehood or stop calling me a liar. While you're at it, either prove that "lying is part of the design" of National Socialism or stop tossing about baseless and irrelevant slander.
 
Here we are Savile Town nr Dewsbury -

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3899540/Go-away-shouldn-t-Don-t-come-corner-Yorkshire-no-white-residents.html

Bradford

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575402/I-feel-like-an-alien-in-my-home-town.html

I shan't do the East End of London, too many articles to choose from --- but it is next because Muslims are not integrating.
Chamberlain's Chamberpot

The formerly Great Britain needs a Churchill to violently resist these Nazislamis.
 

FakeName

Governor
Your first source talks about the approval rate of asylum claims.... Which can only be determined after a full hearing. Duh.


From your other source.

"NPR's Planet Money has learned that more than 13,500 immigrants, mostly Chinese..... "

Fine, but these are not the people that the so called crisis at the border is about. They come on airplanes, have lots of money, etc. And make up a tiny fraction of asylum seekers.

If you aren't knowingly propagating falsehoods you are a pathetically gullible baffoon and i feel sorry for you.

https://www.ushmm.org/collections/bibliography/nazi-propaganda

https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-nazi-rise-to-power/the-nazi-rise-to-power/propaganda/
 
Chamberlain's Chamberpot

The formerly Great Britain needs a Churchill to violently resist these Nazislamis.
God forbid that we should ever have another such as he. He was not liked then though for some unknown reason these last two generations, who were born after he was long gone, seem to think well of him. A leader? Haven't we suffered enough political leaders? There is none on the horizon who could lead anyway, a day dream, a fancy only. No such person as could lead could ever get near number 10 anyway. I would say that we need our politicos, all, to do what they are supposedly in Parliament to do; look out for the nation and not for the pockets of thieves and pimps and other good for nothings profiting from past political follies. It would be a long and laborious job to get back all that has been lost in a decent, civilized and dignified manner as opposed to mass murder as was Churchill's very favorite sport.

Great Britain is a geographical description btw. It is simply the description of all Isles of Britain together as opposed to just the main Island of Britain and I dislike this chest thumping shit about being great nations. Great civilizations are sadly a thing of the past. Churchill lost us the Empire, subs lost us the seas - there is no way in the world that we shall, even if we wanted to, regain that sort of power again. We should have stepped off the world stage when India was lost, gone into genteel retirement - but these bloody politicos have no love or forethought ---

Of the problems bought by mass immigration - yup, repatriation has to be on the cards - lets get Brexit first :)

ps we can't deport anyone whilst we are in the EU.
 
Last edited:
Top