Is Every Criticism of Israel Anti-Semitic?

[reason10]

Which country is he referring to? How do you the country he is referring to is predominately black?

There are no black countries. Most countries look green, from all the vegetation. There are countries in Africa that are populated by Negroids, one of the three races. But there are also other races in those countries. There are no white people anywhere. No human being is totally white. Yes, there are some totally black humans. But there are also many lighter skinned varieties that still hold the Negro label, so skin color is not a major factor.

There are really no inferior countries, at least not in nature. All countries in the world have the potential natural resources to thrive. What makes some countries in to shittholes is the conscious actions of the governments in charge.

It has been proven that the ability to make a country a shitholle is not limited to the Negro race. Caucasians have created shittholes, as well as Mongolians.

 

[Emily]

There are no black countries. Most countries look green, from all the vegetation. There are countries in Africa that are populated by Negroids, one of the three races. But there are also other races in those countries. There are no white people anywhere. No human being is totally white. Yes, there are some totally black humans. But there are also many lighter skinned varieties that still hold the Negro label, so skin color is not a major factor.

There are really no inferior countries, at least not in nature. All countries in the world have the potential natural resources to thrive. What makes some countries in to shittholes is the conscious actions of the governments in charge.

It has been proven that the ability to make a country a shitholle is not limited to the Negro race. Caucasians have created shittholes, as well as Mongolians.

Y'know, for someone who still thinks "Nazi" is an insult with any weight to it and who uses "Nazi" in place of "Democrat" all the time, you sure sound a lot like a National Socialist sometimes.

 

[EatTheRich]

Communists.

Marxists.

Preemption.

And they hated communists/Marxists because they loved capitalism (even if they hated its progressive effects).

 

[EatTheRich]

Ask the Democrats. Their entire political strategy since the Reagan years has been racism and race baiting. Up to now, Republicans have just bent over and taken it. Trump is the first politician to counter punch and give back what he got. He has NEVER used a racist term or phrase in his entire presidency, but that doesn't prevent the Nazis from LYING about that.

So why do so many of the avowed racists support the Republicans then?

 

[Emily]

And they hated communists/Marxists because they loved capitalism (even if they hated its progressive effects).

They hated capitalism because of it's usury (which they did away with) and exploitation of honest labor (which they rewarded as never before or since.) Also, because they knew that it led inevitably to communism (which we see in the West today).
They hated communists/Marxists because they knew what globalist communist/Marxist policies did to destroy societies.
They were also practical and realistic (not to mention effective), unlike communists/Marxists.

You and yours simply label as "capitalist" anything you don't like and any system that doesn't succeed (even though the only Nat'l Socialist government ever tried failed only in losing a war).

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/05/funding-a-movement-german-big-business-and-the-rise-of-hitler/

 

[reason10]

So why do so many of the avowed racists support the Republicans then?

Not possible. Most liberal Democrats are racists, and last time I checked they didn't support Republicans. 95 percent of all racists are on the left.

There are not enough Alt Right types to even fill up a mall. And they likewise believe in identity politics, just like their left wing counterparts.

 

[EatTheRich]

They hated capitalism because of it's usury (which they did away with) and exploitation of honest labor (which they rewarded as never before or since.) Also, because they knew that it led inevitably to communism (which we see in the West today).
They hated communists/Marxists because they knew what globalist communist/Marxist policies did to destroy societies.
They were also practical and realistic (not to mention effective), unlike communists/Marxists.

You and yours simply label as "capitalist" anything you don't like and any system that doesn't succeed (even though the only Nat'l Socialist government ever tried failed only in losing a war).

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/05/funding-a-movement-german-big-business-and-the-rise-of-hitler/

Banks loved the Nazis because they handed them and the trusts they organized the reins of the economy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/hitlers-finances-and-the-myth-of-nazi-anti-usury-activism/amp/

They “rewarded” honest labor with bondage in the concentration camps.

They probably did hate capitalism for leading to communism, but they had no alternative. After all, the petit-bourgeoisie is not a world-historical class capable of exercising state power on its own behalf.

What made them capitalist is that they ruled by the sufferance of the propertied elite.

 

[EatTheRich]

They hated capitalism because of it's usury (which they did away with) and exploitation of honest labor (which they rewarded as never before or since.) Also, because they knew that it led inevitably to communism (which we see in the West today).
They hated communists/Marxists because they knew what globalist communist/Marxist policies did to destroy societies.
They were also practical and realistic (not to mention effective), unlike communists/Marxists.

You and yours simply label as "capitalist" anything you don't like and any system that doesn't succeed (even though the only Nat'l Socialist government ever tried failed only in losing a war).

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/05/funding-a-movement-german-big-business-and-the-rise-of-hitler/

The Nazis had many failures if you ask any person with a moral compass, and their regime was not essentially different from half a dozen other fascist regimes, all of them failures.

 

[EatTheRich]

Not possible. Most liberal Democrats are racists, and last time I checked they didn't support Republicans. 95 percent of all racists are on the left.

There are not enough Alt Right types to even fill up a mall. And they likewise believe in identity politics, just like their left wing counterparts.

Identity politics is generally a right-wing appeal as I have pointed out on this board many times. Look at the last presidential election. Clinton launched her campaign by talking about opportunity and jobs. Trump launched his by attacking Mexicans.

 

[Emily]

Banks loved the Nazis because they handed them and the trusts they organized the reins of the economy.

That would be the opposite of the truth.
Non-German banks loved the National Socialist government because they knew war would be made upon it, and bankers love the profit they always make in war. They knew war would be made upon it because they instigated the war because the National Socialist government freed the German people from their yoke.

They “rewarded” honest labor with bondage in the concentration camps.

That would also be untrue.
They rewarded honest labor with the finest benefits ever available to the working class while, simultaneously, allowing innovators and entrepreneurs to benefit from their talents, skills, and drive. Something Marxists despise.

What made them capitalist is that they ruled by the sufferance of the propertied elite.

They ruled with the overwhelming support of the people.
Marxism, on the other hand, is totally dependent upon capitalism to finance it's "workers' paradise" of unending misery for all but the elite few.

The Nazis had many failures if you ask any person with a moral compass

The National Socialist German Workers' Party had failings and failures if you ask any objective and knowledgeable person. If you ask a person with a moral compass who's actually knowledgeable about the truth of National Socialist philosophy, they could tell you of it's beauty and brilliance.

their regime was not essentially different from half a dozen other fascist regimes, all of them failures.

Their government was successful to an unprecedented degree until the bankers initiated war against it.

 

[EatTheRich]

That would be the opposite of the truth.
Non-German banks loved the National Socialist government because they knew war would be made upon it, and bankers love the profit they always make in war. They knew war would be made upon it because they instigated the war because the National Socialist government freed the German people from their yoke.

They loved the National Socialist government because it crushed their working-class enemy, attacked the USSR which was organized to resist the money power, socialized the costs of business while streamlining access to profits, inflated the economy, and instigated wars. They were funding the hawk parties among the Axis (the ruling parties) and among the Allies.

That would also be untrue.
They rewarded honest labor with the finest benefits ever available to the working class while, simultaneously, allowing innovators and entrepreneurs to benefit from their talents, skills, and drive. Something Marxists despise.

They ruled with the overwhelming support of the people.

Hence their machinery of terror and the mass resistance to the regime. And the fact that they never won a majority in a single Reichstag election, even one in which to vote against them meant a beating and potentially an indefinite stay in a concentration camp.

Marxism, on the other hand, is totally dependent upon capitalism to finance it's "workers' paradise" of unending misery for all but the elite few.

Which is why the Soviets fought tooth and nail to defend their system against the Nazis’ capitalist system. While getting the aid of “Allies” who depended on their military to fight the war for them doled out with an eye dropper, while meanwhile the churches and banks were tripping all over themselves every time the Nazi war machine needed a boost ... “fill ‘er up again, boss? Special discount for you, friend!”

The National Socialist German Workers' Party had failings and failures if you ask any objective and knowledgeable person. If you ask a person with a moral compass who's actually knowledgeable about the truth of National Socialist philosophy, they could tell you of it's beauty and brilliance.

13 million failings and failures, if you don’t count the Wehrmacht’s “failings” from Rotterdam to London to Coventry to Belgrade. Takes a lot of beauty and brilliance to excuse that. And talk about a dearth of culture!

Their government was successful to an unprecedented degree until the bankers initiated war against it.

They couldn’t even get a Volkswagen built. They silenced the media because the facts made them look so bad.

 

[Emily]

They loved the National Socialist government because it crushed their working-class enemy, attacked the USSR which was organized to resist the money power, socialized the costs of business while streamlining access to profits, inflated the economy, and instigated wars. They were funding the hawk parties among the Axis (the ruling parties) and among the Allies.

Hence their machinery of terror and the mass resistance to the regime. And the fact that they never won a majority in a single Reichstag election, even one in which to vote against them meant a beating and potentially an indefinite stay in a concentration camp.



Which is why the Soviets fought tooth and nail to defend their system against the Nazis’ capitalist system. While getting the aid of “Allies” who depended on their military to fight the war for them doled out with an eye dropper, while meanwhile the churches and banks were tripping all over themselves every time the Nazi war machine needed a boost ... “fill ‘er up again, boss? Special discount for you, friend!”




13 million failings and failures, if you don’t count the Wehrmacht’s “failings” from Rotterdam to London to Coventry to Belgrade. Takes a lot of beauty and brilliance to excuse that. And talk about a dearth of culture!



They couldn’t even get a Volkswagen built. They silenced the media because the facts made them look so bad.

Fake Brady. Fake everything else. (Well, ok, you're right about the Soviets handling the bulk of the military combat.)
Let's talk about something you know something about. At least something where your perceptions aren't so twisted by hate and Bolshevist propaganda lies.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

who said they said should go to black nation- YOU did.

I don't think black nations have any connotation other than that's where they came from - YOU do.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

He claimed he did. He said the countries they came from were corrupt and had inept leaderships.

So do a lot of white run nations. And asian run nations. So now you can't make an accurate observation without it being "racist?" Are you suggesting Somalia, Honduras and hell, even Mexico AREN'T corrupt and run by inept leadership?

 

[ObamacareForever]

I don't think black nations have any connotation other than that's where they came from - YOU do.

When you say, "black nation" we aren't talking about connotations. The racism is explicitly denoted.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

When you say, "black nation" we aren't talking about connotations. The racism is explicitly denoted.

You are the one who brought it up! How can I respond to you without mentioning it???

 

[EatTheRich]

So do a lot of white run nations. And asian run nations. So now you can't make an accurate observation without it being "racist?" Are you suggesting Somalia, Honduras and hell, even Mexico AREN'T corrupt and run by inept leadership?

None of the members of Congress he told to go back to the corrupt countries with inept leaderships that they came from were from Honduras or Mexico. 3 were from the U.S.

 

[BobbyT]

None of the members of Congress he told to go back to the corrupt countries with inept leaderships that they came from were from Honduras or Mexico. 3 were from the U.S.

True. And the corrupt country with inept leadership he was pointing to was his own corrupt inept leadership. At least he was right about that part.

 

[Dawg]

None of the members of Congress he told to go back to the corrupt countries with inept leaderships that they came from were from Honduras or Mexico. 3 were from the U.S.

Muslim-American...……...2 will never say they are just Americans
that leaves 1 Puerto Rican-American and African-American that will do the same...…...

BTW: you are an Infidel and being Gay is a death sentence by Omar & Tlaib!

 

[Dawg]

True. And the corrupt country with inept leadership he was pointing to was his own corrupt inept leadership. At least he was right about that part.

"Human Race"……does that include Israelites ….Omar will never claim to be just an American

https://deplorablekel.com/2019/02/16/ilhan-omar-admits-she-will-not-assimilate-and-will-not-respect-american-culture/