New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Nadler: ‘This Is Formal Impeachment Proceedings’

Spamature

President
No, he didn't. After referring back to his report, he then agreed
He decided he was not going to play word games and let the report stand.

But his testimony is that collusion and conspiracy are not the same thing. Collusion can be legal and wrong. Conspiracy is a crime that has specific legal standards that need to be met. He says his investigation could not find enough evidence on conspiracy to meet those standards. But that does not mean there was not evidence of both collusion and conspiracy.
 

Colorforms

Senator
He decided he was not going to play word games and let the report stand.

But his testimony is that collusion and conspiracy are not the same thing. Collusion can be legal and wrong. Conspiracy is a crime that has specific legal standards that need to be met. He says his investigation could not find enough evidence on conspiracy to meet those standards. But that does not mean there was not evidence of both collusion and conspiracy.
Again, you can pretend he meant something different than what he said, but he said he stood by his report, and in the report it specifically states that the terms are interchangeable.

You really are grasping at straws.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
A) Mueller isn't a Democratic Party member.

B) It looks like he purposely stayed out of it and decided from the start that it was really the job of congress to investigate.
w/a gang of prog lawyers doing his job
 

Spamature

President
Again, you can pretend he meant something different than what he said, but he said he stood by his report, and in the report it specifically states that the terms are interchangeable.

You really are grasping at straws.
But they are not and were not for the purpose of this investigation.

Mueller was looking for crimes under the law.

Collusion is not a crime under the law.
 

Spamature

President
The report said they were and Mueller backed that up.
You saw him argue against the assertion. You saw him do that for most of the video. Yet you want to ignore it and concentrate on the word games that GOPer was playing.

You are grasping at straws and you know it.
 

Colorforms

Senator
You saw him argue against the assertion. You saw him do that for most of the video. Yet you want to ignore it and concentrate on the word games that GOPer was playing.

You are grasping at straws and you know it.
You know what? Whatever....

You can believe what you want to. I really don't care. If it would make you feel better to want so badly for the president to be colluding with Russia, then feel free to believe it. I'm not a fascist leftie, so you can believe whatever you want. These circular arguments aren't worth my time.
 

Spamature

President
You know what? Whatever....

You can believe what you want to. I really don't care. If it would make you feel better to want so badly for the president to be colluding with Russia, then feel free to believe it. These circular arguments aren't worth my time.
I didn't want him to do it. But I am not going to ignore that he did.
 

Jen

Senator
Well Trump & Co asked for it. Now they are getting what they asked for.


House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) admitted in public Thursday evening that his panel is conducting “formal impeachment proceedings” against President Trump.





He said the Judiciary Committee will decide likely by the end of the year whether to recommend bringing articles of impeachment to the House floor.


“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler told CNN’s Erin Burnett Thursday evening. “We are investigating all the evidence, gathering the evidence. And we will [at the] conclusion of this — hopefully by the end of the year — vote to vote articles of impeachment to the House floor. Or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”


Nadler said it was important not to get lost in the “semantics” of the discussion and said while the probe would end with some type of vote on whether the recommend impeachment, right now the committee is interested in “investigating the evidence.” A big part of the committee’s investigation


“The fact is, we are doing an investigation. We are investigating the facts, investigating the evidence,” Nadler said. “We are going into court to get witnesses all with a view toward deciding and recommending to the House whether to impeach the President.”


https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/nadler-formal-impeachment-proceedings
Nadler.
What a maroon.

I say..........go for the impeachment.

It oughta sew things right up for Trump in 2020.
 

Colorforms

Senator
I didn't want him to do it. But I am not going to ignore that he did.
Even though after 3 investigations it shows he didn't? You want him to have done it so badly that it's driving you nuts. In fact, I don't even think you care that he did or didn't do it, you just want him gone and you'll cling to any excuse to get rid of him. You people really are turning us into a 3rd world banana republic
 
Top