EatTheRich
President
So Mueller was “in on it”?Yeah they sat there being angry and unable to do anything for 2 yrs while the GOP went all in on Trump's cover up.
So Mueller was “in on it”?Yeah they sat there being angry and unable to do anything for 2 yrs while the GOP went all in on Trump's cover up.
A) Mueller isn't a Democratic Party member.So Mueller was “in on it”?
He decided he was not going to play word games and let the report stand.No, he didn't. After referring back to his report, he then agreed
Again, you can pretend he meant something different than what he said, but he said he stood by his report, and in the report it specifically states that the terms are interchangeable.He decided he was not going to play word games and let the report stand.
But his testimony is that collusion and conspiracy are not the same thing. Collusion can be legal and wrong. Conspiracy is a crime that has specific legal standards that need to be met. He says his investigation could not find enough evidence on conspiracy to meet those standards. But that does not mean there was not evidence of both collusion and conspiracy.
w/a gang of prog lawyers doing his jobA) Mueller isn't a Democratic Party member.
B) It looks like he purposely stayed out of it and decided from the start that it was really the job of congress to investigate.
But they are not and were not for the purpose of this investigation.Again, you can pretend he meant something different than what he said, but he said he stood by his report, and in the report it specifically states that the terms are interchangeable.
You really are grasping at straws.
The report said they were and Mueller backed that up.But they are not and were not for the purpose of this investigation.
Mueller was looking for crimes under the law.
Collusion is not a crime under the law.
A bunch of Republican lawyers worked on the Clinton investigation. Pugs like Brett Kavanaugh, who we all know as a rule bending, rule breaking, liar.w/a gang of prog lawyers doing his job
You saw him argue against the assertion. You saw him do that for most of the video. Yet you want to ignore it and concentrate on the word games that GOPer was playing.The report said they were and Mueller backed that up.
You know what? Whatever....You saw him argue against the assertion. You saw him do that for most of the video. Yet you want to ignore it and concentrate on the word games that GOPer was playing.
You are grasping at straws and you know it.
Conspiracy is, and he found none.But they are not and were not for the purpose of this investigation.
Mueller was looking for crimes under the law.
Collusion is not a crime under the law.
What page of the report is that on?He says his investigation could not find enough evidence on conspiracy to meet those standards.
damn, derailing your own bs...…A bunch of Republican lawyers worked on the Clinton investigation. Pugs like Brett Kavanaugh, who we all know as a rule bending, rule breaking, liar.
I didn't want him to do it. But I am not going to ignore that he did.You know what? Whatever....
You can believe what you want to. I really don't care. If it would make you feel better to want so badly for the president to be colluding with Russia, then feel free to believe it. These circular arguments aren't worth my time.
Read the report where he defines conspiracy.What page of the report is that on?
Cut and paste, and cite the page.
Watch this..............
I did.Read the report where he defines conspiracy.
Then you shouldn't have any questions about what I said. It's right there on the page.I did.
That's why I successfully called you out on your lie.
And yet you can’t quote it.Then you shouldn't have any questions about what I said. It's right there on the page.
Nadler.Well Trump & Co asked for it. Now they are getting what they asked for.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) admitted in public Thursday evening that his panel is conducting “formal impeachment proceedings” against President Trump.
He said the Judiciary Committee will decide likely by the end of the year whether to recommend bringing articles of impeachment to the House floor.
“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler told CNN’s Erin Burnett Thursday evening. “We are investigating all the evidence, gathering the evidence. And we will [at the] conclusion of this — hopefully by the end of the year — vote to vote articles of impeachment to the House floor. Or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”
Nadler said it was important not to get lost in the “semantics” of the discussion and said while the probe would end with some type of vote on whether the recommend impeachment, right now the committee is interested in “investigating the evidence.” A big part of the committee’s investigation
“The fact is, we are doing an investigation. We are investigating the facts, investigating the evidence,” Nadler said. “We are going into court to get witnesses all with a view toward deciding and recommending to the House whether to impeach the President.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/nadler-formal-impeachment-proceedings
Even though after 3 investigations it shows he didn't? You want him to have done it so badly that it's driving you nuts. In fact, I don't even think you care that he did or didn't do it, you just want him gone and you'll cling to any excuse to get rid of him. You people really are turning us into a 3rd world banana republicI didn't want him to do it. But I am not going to ignore that he did.