New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Democrats Foot in Mouths: Blasey Ford's Attorney Admits Her Testimony was Politically Motivated

Mr. Friscus

Governor
That's right. Kavannaugh isn't good enough. He is trash, and he cost the Republican party the respect of a generation of people.
Come on man, I'm waiting for an answer to this:

So what if an opposing party makes a false claim?

What if a justice you personally would like to see is up for vote, and the GOP grabs an obvious plant and has them claim "sexual assault"

By your definition, that person would not be "good enough" to sit on the supreme court, right? The accusation is out there. That's your only criteria.
 

reason10

Governor
It doesn’t say her testimony was untrue. It said that she was motivated to testify by concern that he would bring the same misogyny she saw in her personal interaction with him to his decisions as a justice.
The lying slut committed perjury. She should have been charged, found guilty and sent to prison. She LIED. Worse than that, she engaged in obstruction of justice by LYING.
 

EatTheRich

President
The lying slut committed perjury. She should have been charged, found guilty and sent to prison. She LIED. Worse than that, she engaged in obstruction of justice by LYING.
You are making charges of criminal activity with reckless disregard to whether they are true.
 

reason10

Governor
You are making charges of criminal activity with reckless disregard to whether they are true.
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/legal-analyst-hillary-clinton-can-charged-13-crimes/

Legal Analyst: Hillary Clinton Can Be Charged With 13 Crimes

13 potential crimes committed by Hillary Clinton, she’d be charged for six anti-corruption – they were all felonies,” Jarrett analyzed. “She could also be charged with racketeering for using her charity as a criminal enterprise and then you’ve got all of the email crimes – two of them under the espionage act and two additional.”


Fox News reported that “the FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear officials were involved in fraudulent dealings – including extortion, bribery and kickbacks – as far back as 2009” who were then part of the 2010 deal approved in part by the Clinton State Department.

Donations from interested parties to the Clinton Foundation, a $500,000 speaking fee for former President Bill Clinton in Russia, and a meeting with the dreaded Vladimir Putin around the time of the deal raised eyebrows.


President Trump is a boy scout compared to all that.

Hell, BERNIE MADOFF is a boy scout compared to all that.
 

EatTheRich

President
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/legal-analyst-hillary-clinton-can-charged-13-crimes/

Legal Analyst: Hillary Clinton Can Be Charged With 13 Crimes

13 potential crimes committed by Hillary Clinton, she’d be charged for six anti-corruption – they were all felonies,” Jarrett analyzed. “She could also be charged with racketeering for using her charity as a criminal enterprise and then you’ve got all of the email crimes – two of them under the espionage act and two additional.”


Fox News reported that “the FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear officials were involved in fraudulent dealings – including extortion, bribery and kickbacks – as far back as 2009” who were then part of the 2010 deal approved in part by the Clinton State Department.

Donations from interested parties to the Clinton Foundation, a $500,000 speaking fee for former President Bill Clinton in Russia, and a meeting with the dreaded Vladimir Putin around the time of the deal raised eyebrows.

President Trump is a boy scout compared to all that.

Hell, BERNIE MADOFF is a boy scout compared to all that.
Oh, so she could be charged with crimes if she would have committed those crimes?
 

reason10

Governor
Oh, so she could be charged with crimes if she would have committed those crimes?

Oh, she DID commit them, and many more. And because we have a two tiered justice system, she'll probably get away with it.
 

EatTheRich

President
Oh, so she could be charged with crimes if she would have committed those crimes?

Oh, she DID commit them, and many more. And because we have a two tiered justice system, she'll probably get away with it.
Ha, if there were ANY way to secure an indictment, you can bet the Trump DOJ would have moved heaven and earth to make it happen and handed Trump a badly needed first real political victory.
 
Come on man, I'm waiting for an answer to this:

So what if an opposing party makes a false claim?

What if a justice you personally would like to see is up for vote, and the GOP grabs an obvious plant and has them claim "sexual assault"

By your definition, that person would not be "good enough" to sit on the supreme court, right? The accusation is out there. That's your only criteria.
Then prove them false. It is a national embarrassment that we have 2 rapists on the supreme court.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
Then prove them false. It is a national embarrassment that we have 2 rapists on the supreme court.
So your are on record declaring that Justices should be guilty until proven innocent.

Everyone has a right to their opinion, but you certainly are at an impasse with American values.

Thankfully, we don't live in your world, where mere claims can damn someone's life.. Salem Witch Trials style.

Oh, and just to demonstrate.. Someone from your high school is now saying you touched them at a party... you are now a disgrace to your current job. Will you gladly accept your unproven guilt, step down, and embrace the shame and humiliation with being such a vile monster?
 
So your are on record declaring that Justices should be guilty until proven innocent.
I am on the record saying he shouldn't have been confirmed until he was proven innocent. There are higher standards for the SCOTUS than not going to jail. But Republicans don't get that. They think not being in jail is a qualification. They are the party of low standards.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
I am on the record saying he shouldn't have been confirmed until he was proven innocent. There are higher standards for the SCOTUS than not going to jail. But Republicans don't get that. They think not being in jail is a qualification. They are the party of low standards.
Yes, you think people are guilty until proven innocent. You just again said as such.

You are at an impasse with the system of law in which you're speaking about.

Again, Salem Witch Trials = justice, right?
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
No, I think they are ineligble for some jobs until proven innocent. Do you understand the difference?

No, it was a job interview. Being a raper is a plenty good reason to not get a job.
So you're up for a job, and the person also hoping for the job says you're a rapist.

No questions? They get the job?

;)
 
So you're up for a job, and the person also hoping for the job says you're a rapist.

No questions? They get the job?

;)
not exactly a true analogy. If my perspective employers instead of a job competitor made the accusation I think the analogy would be apt.

And then yes, the burden would fall on me to prove I wasn't a rapist. Or I wouldn't expect the job.
 
Top