None of the polls back that up.More and more Remainers now want to Leave - and we want to leave without a new Treaty/deal.
https://whatukthinks.org/eu/opinion-polls/uk-poll-results/
Did you just make that up?
None of the polls back that up.More and more Remainers now want to Leave - and we want to leave without a new Treaty/deal.
Te only way out is OUT. If we get anything less both the Tory Party and Labour are history.If only there was a way out that was compatible with the GFA that parliament could agree on.
I live here -None of the polls back that up.
https://whatukthinks.org/eu/opinion-polls/uk-poll-results/
Did you just make that up?
Most of your countrymen and women disagree with you.Te only way out is OUT. If we get anything less both the Tory Party and Labour are history.
So?I live here -
Try reading the comments sections everywhere.So?
Show me some evidence.
ALL of the polling data says otherwise.
In London, Bristol and Brighton = Remoaner country.Most of your countrymen and women disagree with you.
https://whatukthinks.org/eu/opinion-polls/uk-poll-results/
Those are "anecdotes" not "evidence".Try reading the comments sections everywhere.
Answer my question. How do you think the SC judges gain their seats?Those are "anecdotes" not "evidence".
People largely live in bubbles that reenforce pre existing beliefs.
That is why actual evidence is so important.
A commission picks someone. Lord chancellor approves, or not, then the prine minister reccomends to the queen and she appoints.Answer my question. How do you think the SC judges gain their seats?
The Court was set up by Blair in 2005 and they are all appointed. They are supposed to sit on civil and criminal cases only -------- ye Gods I've had to read enough of them!A commission picks someone. Lord chancellor approves, or not, then the prine minister reccomends to the queen and she appoints.
So what?
Annnnnd Proroguing Parliament is an accepted tool of the PM --- My God the Labour Party repeatedly prorogued Parliament for a whole year to get nationalization through, in the 1940s --- It has been used by Govs since there were Govs- No-one have ever complained before, even since we have been in the EU.A commission picks someone. Lord chancellor approves, or not, then the prine minister reccomends to the queen and she appoints.
So what?
Your supreme Court disagrees.....says it was illegal this time.Annnnnd Proroguing Parliament is an accepted tool of the PM --- My God the Labour Party repeatedly prorogued Parliament for a whole year to get nationalization through, in the 1940s --- It has been used by Govs since there were Govs- No-one have ever complained before, even since we have been in the EU.
Tony Blair's Supreme Court - not ours. We want our old Law Lords back. Once we are outside the EU it has no purpose anyway - it will be gone.Your supreme Court disagrees.....says it was illegal this time.
Case closed.
No.Tony Blair's Supreme Court - not ours. We want our old Law Lords back. Once we are outside the EU it has no purpose anyway - it will be gone.
It is Tony Blair's Supreme court which just found outside the law.No.
It is the UK's Supreme Court.
I know you don't like it but that is just a fact.
No.It is Tony Blair's Supreme court which just found outside the law.
Tony Blair disbanded the House of Lords for no good reason. The Law Lords within The Lords were the highest legal authorities in our Land - Blair after disbanding them set up the SC which is not made up of the best nor soundest legal minds in the Land.No.
It is the UK's Supreme Court.
I know you don't like it but that is just a fact.
Yet it is the UK's Supreme court.Tony Blair disbanded the House of Lords for no good reason. The Law Lords within The Lords were the highest legal authorities in our Land - Blair after disbanding them set up the SC which is not made up of the best nor soundest legal minds in the Land.
This Blair court has left us with a constitutional crisis akin to the one which ended up in a civil war here.
For the moment -Yet it is the UK's Supreme court.