New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Micky Mouse And Rob Rob Among 11,000 *Scientists* Who Signed Dire Climate Change Warning!

Mr. Friscus

Governor
Another “scientific fact”: Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election. Right?

Or how about XX = female, XY = male

But wait... why do I always hear about how that’s somehow not true from these same folk?
 

EatTheRich

President
"Corrected their data?" What if it is still wrong?
Sorry, I should say they corrected their analysis of the data. If it is still wrong, scientists will again point the error out and it will again be corrected. The same way every scientific investigation proceeds. In fact, it is that self-correcting mechanism that makes science, despite the occasional brief, episodic error, our only reliable source of knowledge
 

EatTheRich

President
So AOC is lying? Wow, that's quite an attack on a fellow communist.
1. Ocasio-Cortez is a capitalist politician.
2. You are misrepresenting what she said, either through stupidity or malice.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thinkprogress.org/scientists-defend-ocasio-cortez-12-year-ipcc-science-climate-warning-9daee90fae7b/amp/
Within this, it’s also important to note that some Ocasio-Cortez critics took her comments out of context and tried to make it seem as if she was declaring literally, “the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.”

But as the video of her interview with the writer Ta-Nehisi Coates makes clear, she was talking about why millennials and younger people have a different sense of urgency about climate change — it is because they are the ones who will have to deal with the consequences. For them, the world they once knew will be dramatically and irreversibly altered.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
1. Ocasio-Cortez is a capitalist politician.
2. You are misrepresenting what she said, either through stupidity or malice.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thinkprogress.org/scientists-defend-ocasio-cortez-12-year-ipcc-science-climate-warning-9daee90fae7b/amp/
Within this, it’s also important to note that some Ocasio-Cortez critics took her comments out of context and tried to make it seem as if she was declaring literally, “the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.”

But as the video of her interview with the writer Ta-Nehisi Coates makes clear, she was talking about why millennials and younger people have a different sense of urgency about climate change — it is because they are the ones who will have to deal with the consequences. For them, the world they once knew will be dramatically and irreversibly altered.
I stopped at "scientists say....."
 

EatTheRich

President
Another “scientific fact”: Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election. Right?

Or how about XX = female, XY = male

But wait... why do I always hear about how that’s somehow not true from these same folk?
XX=genetically female. XY=generically male. These do not always correspond with mental sex, hormonal sex, genital sex, or gender presentation.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
1. Ocasio-Cortez is a capitalist politician.
2. You are misrepresenting what she said, either through stupidity or malice.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thinkprogress.org/scientists-defend-ocasio-cortez-12-year-ipcc-science-climate-warning-9daee90fae7b/amp/
Within this, it’s also important to note that some Ocasio-Cortez critics took her comments out of context and tried to make it seem as if she was declaring literally, “the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.”

But as the video of her interview with the writer Ta-Nehisi Coates makes clear, she was talking about why millennials and younger people have a different sense of urgency about climate change — it is because they are the ones who will have to deal with the consequences. For them, the world they once knew will be dramatically and irreversibly altered.
I listened to her say it. "And we're like, the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change." Obviously, she is part of "we".

Once again, you lied and posted a link that doesn't prove your claim. And once again, I have to point out how your links virtually NEVER prove what you say they do.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
XX=genetically female. XY=generically male. These do not always correspond with mental sex, hormonal sex, genital sex, or gender presentation.
The first and last: seek counseling. The middle two: bummer. Good thing both are very rare.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Sorry, I should say they corrected their analysis of the data. If it is still wrong, scientists will again point the error out and it will again be corrected. The same way every scientific investigation proceeds. In fact, it is that self-correcting mechanism that makes science, despite the occasional brief, episodic error, our only reliable source of knowledge
"Climate change" is not a "scientific investigation. It is a political movement. And it isn't about climate at all, it is about control (of the government, the economy, and every person on the planet). The last thing you people are interested in is a "reliable source of knowledge." At least about "climate change." Lets face it, if you people really cared about reducing carbon emissions, the last thing you would advocate is unlimited immigration of Central and South American peasants, who in their home countries use negligible amounts of carbon based fuels, into America, where we have the largest carbon footprint in the world.
 

EatTheRich

President
I listened to her say it. "And we're like, the world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change." Obviously, she is part of "we".

Once again, you lied and posted a link that doesn't prove your claim. And once again, I have to point out how your links virtually NEVER prove what you say they do.
Oops! I cut and pasted the relevant material from the link in my reply.
 

EatTheRich

President
"Climate change" is not a "scientific investigation. It is a political movement. And it isn't about climate at all, it is about control (of the government, the economy, and every person on the planet). The last thing you people are interested in is a "reliable source of knowledge." At least about "climate change." Lets face it, if you people really cared about reducing carbon emissions, the last thing you would advocate is unlimited immigration of Central and South American peasants, who in their home countries use negligible amounts of carbon based fuels, into America, where we have the largest carbon footprint in the world.
So why are all the scientists on the side of climate realism, while only political ideologues are on the side of climate denial? Just because your de facto response to the climate emergency is mass death doesn’t mean we have to embrace the same.
 

EatTheRich

President
What is “mental sex”?

What is “hormonal sex”?

Are you just making things up?
Hormonal sex=the balance of male and female sex hormones released by the endocrine system. They don’t always align with sex chromosomes.

Mental sex=the brain’s mental representation. The brains of trans women are physically more similar to the brains of cis women than to the brains of cis men; the brains of trans men are physically more similar to the brains of cis men than to the brains of cis women.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
So why are all the scientists on the side of climate realism, while only political ideologues are on the side of climate denial? Just because your de facto response to the climate emergency is mass death doesn’t mean we have to embrace the same.
Answer my question and I'll answer yours - how can you claim to worry about man caused climate change while supporting unlimited immigration of people from low carbon footprint areas into America where the carbon footprint is the highest in the world?
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Sorry, I should say they corrected their analysis of the data. If it is still wrong, scientists will again point the error out and it will again be corrected. The same way every scientific investigation proceeds. In fact, it is that self-correcting mechanism that makes science, despite the occasional brief, episodic error, our only reliable source of knowledge
Translation: Yes, I concede political activists, er, scientists have been caught lying and manipulating data to achieve the desired results. If they get caught again, no big deal. They can just find another way to manipulate data to keep moving towards their goals.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Hormonal sex=the balance of male and female sex hormones released by the endocrine system. They don’t always align with sex chromosomes.

Mental sex=the brain’s mental representation. The brains of trans women are physically more similar to the brains of cis women than to the brains of cis men; the brains of trans men are physically more similar to the brains of cis men than to the brains of cis women.
There are two genders: male and female.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
1 in 60 is not all that rare.
LIE.

"Blackless, Fausto-Sterling et al., said in two articles in 2000 that 1.7 percent of human births (1 in 60) might be intersex, including variations that may not become apparent until, for example, puberty, or until attempting to conceive."

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=percentage+of+intersex+births

"Might be" = you're full of crap. And "intersex" can males and females that simply cannot reproduce.

As usual, you post easily debunked LIES.
 

EatTheRich

President
Answer my question and I'll answer yours - how can you claim to worry about man caused climate change while supporting unlimited immigration of people from low carbon footprint areas into America where the carbon footprint is the highest in the world?
Because my concern about climate change is about preventing mass starvation. While not allowing people to immigrate will mean more mass starvation, as well as perpetuating the capitalist system that is the main reason for individuals here having a high carbon footprint.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Because my concern about climate change is about preventing mass starvation. While not allowing people to immigrate will mean more mass starvation, as well as perpetuating the capitalist system that is the main reason for individuals here having a high carbon footprint.
If your concern is about starvation, you should welcome higher CO2 levels. Oops!
 
Top