New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Wacky GOP House member: Schiff must testify!

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Quit playing games. it would have been way more efficient to just answer the question.

It was a simple question. if you don't want to discuss it fine but I am not playing childish games with you.
If you watch the inquiry it was said on day one who the star witnesses are
YOU NEED TO STOP PLAYING GAMES.
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
perfectly.

Are you?

Schiff wasn't a witness to any of the events under investigation in the impeachment inquiry. If he did anything wrong that would be for another inquiry or ethics review. It is irrelevant to the events in question in this one.

On the other hand Trump, Guliani, Mulvaney and Pompeo were involved in the events under investigation in this inquiry. Their testimony would clear it up one way or the other.

Duh!

That is not partisan just logical.

Give it a try.
Most of the witnesses did not witness the call either. Do you have a point?
 
perfectly.

Are you?

Schiff wasn't a witness to any of the events under investigation in the impeachment inquiry. If he did anything wrong that would be for another inquiry or ethics review. It is irrelevant to the events in question in this one.

On the other hand Trump, Guliani, Mulvaney and Pompeo were involved in the events under investigation in this inquiry. Their testimony would clear it up one way or the other.

Duh!

That is not partisan just logical.

Give it a try.
Schiff lied about not knowing the identity of the whistleblower. That lie invalidates everything else he's said since.
 

FakeName

Governor
Schiff lied about not knowing the identity of the whistleblower. That lie invalidates everything else he's said since.
Ok.

Of that is true it may be a relevant subject for an ethics investigation.

It is wholly irrelevant to the content of the whistle blowers complaint, all of which has been independantly verified by other testimony under oath.

Do you really not get that?
 
Top