Wisconsin judge orders that 200,000 voters be stricken from the rolls

[Bugsy McGurk]

Don't you just HATE it when the states actually follow the laws regarding voting and voter registration?

Why yes. You do.

LOL!

I do when the laws are GOP voter suppression laws.

Duh.

 

[PhilFish]

Of course they were registered. They couldn’t be purged if they weren’t registered in the first place. And the fact that some voters may be able to circumvent the purge does not justify the purge.

Once upon a time this nation cherished voting rights.

yes, they were. but no longer. (was the no i meant).

Voting rights are still cherished.

as noted..anyone affected..can still vote (that is the voting right you refer to, that I affirm, remains cherished and unaffected)

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

yes, they were. but no longer. (was the no i meant).

Voting rights are still cherished.

as noted..anyone affected..can still vote (that is the voting right you refer to, that I affirm, remains cherished and unaffected)

People who cherish voting rights do not selectively purge 200,000 voters from the rolls.

 

[PhilFish]

People who cherish voting rights do not selectively purge 200,000 voters from the rolls.

for obvious reasons, yes they do

 

[Dawg]

People who cherish voting rights do not selectively purge 200,000 voters from the rolls.

Call the Judge and tell him that...……….

 

[JuliefromOhio]

This is Republican Vote Suppression 101. They do it in every blue/purple state....when they're not doing other stuff like moving or eliminating polling locations in heavy Democratic districts, or closing DMVs making it harder to get a state photo ID, etc.

Republicans win when turnout is low, Democrats win when turnout is high.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Jen isn't going to like this. Right wingers need an excuse in case Trump loses.

Oh, Trump will just reuse the lie he told in 2016, that 5 million illegals voted for Hillary. LOL.

 

[Dawg]

Oh, Trump will just reuse the lie he told in 2016, that 5 million illegals voted for Hillary. LOL.

She Lost

 

[Fast Eddy]

Trump won Wisconsin by 23,000 votes in 2016. The litigation in question was brought by a right wing group. Likely Dem voters would, of course, be disproportionately affected.

The latest chapter in the GOP’s war on voting rights...

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/us/wisconsin-voter-purge.html

Anoth grea news story. Trump would have won by 500k if the Libtars had not cheated and had all those dead people vote. About time they start making the voting fair.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Call the Judge and tell him that...……….

I’ll pass on that. I’m telling it to you.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

This is Republican Vote Suppression 101. They do it in every blue/purple state....when they're not doing other stuff like moving or eliminating polling locations in heavy Democratic districts, or closing DMVs making it harder to get a state photo ID, etc.

Republicans win when turnout is low, Democrats win when turnout is high.

And as courts have found, GOP voter suppression laws target minorities and other likely Dems voters with “surgical precision.”

If their voter suppression laws strike two Dems for every Republican, the math works out very well for them at election time. They have such unpatriotic schemes down to a science.

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

And as courts have found, GOP voter suppression laws target minorities and other likely Dems voters with “surgical precision.”

If their voter suppression laws strike two Dems for every Republican, the math works out very well for them at election time. They have such unpatriotic schemes down to a science.

3 sentences and 3 whoppers!

That my fellow posters is a textbook example of DNC trolling at it's finest.

Good job Bugs. I am sure Tom Perez is all puffed up like a proud papa rooster!

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

3 sentences and 3 whoppers!

That my fellow posters is a textbook example of DNC trolling at it's finest.

Good job Bugs. I am sure Tom Perez is all puffed up like a proud papa rooster!

Translation: You posted inarguable, undeniable facts. Ergo, I screech “Liar!” without even trying to make the case. I hate you.

;-)

 

[EatTheRich]

tell Omar Good-bye

Omar is from Minnesota.

 

[EatTheRich]

hmm. no, it seems they were asked to validate address within a period of time and they did not.

meanwhile, if there is an issue they can re-register de-moment at the polls..

Voter caging is illegal. As it should be, since the only purpose is to disqualify eligible and duly registered voters, disproportionately those who are poor and/or uneducated.

 

[Dawg]

I’ll pass on that. I’m telling it to you.

I'm not the Judge

 

[Dawg]

Voter caging is illegal. As it should be, since the only purpose is to disqualify eligible and duly registered voters, disproportionately those who are poor and/or uneducated.

it's for those that have Moved or have improper address

 

[Dawg]

Translation: You posted inarguable, undeniable facts. Ergo, I screech “Liar!” without even trying to make the case. I hate you.

;-)

Not even close to what he posted and you get away with name calling and quoting nothing he said...……..Judge fixing to get you in deep dooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[PhilFish]

Voter caging is illegal. As it should be, since the only purpose is to disqualify eligible and duly registered voters, disproportionately those who are poor and/or uneducated.

That's great but nobody's talking about voter caging. What is under discussion here is individuals who either have not voted in a period of time or who may have passed away, moved and so forth

Meanwhile as I noted in an earlier post an individual can re-register at the moment at the polls

So, in reality no one is disqualified

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

tell Omar Good-bye

The founders never meant for everyone to have representation did they.