And if you really want your point to stick, you might want to do a quick search (especially of local news reporting) to see if your point has held up . . . Hint, it hasn't.
FedEx Driver Who Killed Would-Be Robber Had License to Carry Gun, Police Say
Funny how only a couple of the links you posted report the true circumstances of the death of the man the party was being thrown for . . .
Worse is that some report him as a "victim of gun violence" or a "gunshot victim" when he was actually a carjacking criminal who was shot by his victim...
You can say now that you finally know why Colt made this business decision.
It had nothing to do with virtue signalling to anti-liberty goofballs and everything to do with fulfilling a government contract for 50,000 or so units over the next few years.
This was the simultaneous announcement on...
I'm gonna guess you don't really understand what's going on. Did you even read the press release from Colt linked to, in the article you linked to?
1) Colt's AR's are in the upperlevel price point for a nothing special AR and they have lost significant market share.
2) They are focusing their...
Is your definition of "selective editing" anything that the Justices say (what you call, "gun nut talking points") that refutes what you say?
Really, it isn't at all "selective editing" to quote the words, "The Amendment protects an “individual” right" when they are the words of a Justice in an...
LOL. There was no "good stuff" because her opinion isn't authoritative. I can link to an artlice by Stephen Halbrook who has a hellovalot more credentials that this woman that will shred her and you. But I wouldn't cite a source like him or her.
You obviously did not read the article you...
I would assume Ms. Fox is a very talented researcher who does a good job at the Office of Legislative Research, writing analysis and summaries of issues for the [Democrat majority] legislators in the Connecticut General Assembly.
I'm not sure why you feel I should give her opinion any weight or...
I've ignored you stomping your feet and holding your breath and screaming that I'm wrong. You have devolved to such a debased state that you are deriding quotes from the Justices as "gun nut talking points". . . That's freaking hilarious!
I would have liked to see an explanation of your...
That's what is so hilarious about leftist, statist authoritarians . . . Usually what they believe is true is diametrically opposed to what is true. Saying "the majority rules" and citing polls that call for restricting fundamental rights* only demonstrate the profound ignorance of the speaker...
And we see you chose the Bugsy-Bunny rabbit hole. You chose the Bugsy-Bunny rabbit hole but you only went half-way, you didn't explain how or why you are arguing Breyer denies the individual right interpretation . . . You just declare a Trumpism and say "you know that's true".
No, I...
If you are correct it is inexplicable why Stevens signed onto the Breyer's dissent; really it makes no sense.
Stevens could have written a "concurring in part" opinion if he really disagreed with Breyer's individual right holding and the affirmation of SCOTUS individual right precedent...
I ignored it because it is Stevens speaking as a private citizen, not as a Justice on the Court. He laid out a conditioned individual right in his dissent but after retirement he devolved into parroting a 1970's circuit judge arguing the pure Cases v US militia right.
His Atlantic article...
Your errors in fact and reasoning can not be destroyed in a sentence or two.
And here we go!
Bull excrement! You used it as your own, applying whatever you discern from Burger's statement, telling @freysman his "view" is equatable with the "fraud" Burger was talking about:
And telling...
Are you on drugs?
All four dissenting Justices say the individual right interpretation is the correct one, the one represented in all three Heller opinions and has been the consistent holding in the precedent of the Supreme Court AND THAT THE ENTIRE COURT SUBSCRIBES TO THAT HOLDING:
The Second...