If the poster sites a hate group as if it were a valid source (in otherwords not just to say "check out the ridiculous and hateful crap these kooks believe").
In other words if the poster cannot tell the difference between a valid source and a hate group.....
Then that post and that poster no...
In my opinion if a post sites five sources to make a point and one of them is a hate group, the entire post has no credibility.
Let's say somone is trying to make a point about "the jews" and they site several sources, one of them being a Neo Nazi group. They just destroyed their credibility...
Yes, and one of the links was to a hate group. If you were a teacher how is it that you cannot tell the difference between a hate group and a valid source?
Again. Tucker Carlson is not a journalist. Why do you keep calling him a journalist?
And the military should defend their own from the ridiculous comments of entitled little pussies with TV shows.
Honor requires it
Nope, not what I am saying.
They have way bigger enemies but they are fully capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.
Defending their own from the lame comments of entitled little pussies like Tucker Carlson is worth while.
What it is doing to our country is benefitting out country like it always has.
America has always had haters like you and they have always been wrong.
One would hope you all could learn from history.