New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Good article on climate

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
and some new data...

This winter's wild weather got its start 4,000 years ago, a new study finds.


The roaring jet stream, whose swooping winds drove frigid cold in the East and record warmth in the West this winter, first started twisting and turning about 4,000 years ago, according to a new analysis of ancient rainfall records from North America. Jet stream winds race from west to east, and kinks in the narrow atmospheric current can suck Arctic cold south or hold warm air in place.




http://news.yahoo.com/frigid-winter-blame-4-000-years-wild-jet-174247112.html
 

Wahbooz

Governor
Interesting point.

However, the findings also suggest that global warming may boost the frequency or intensity of the curves, which would mean more winter extremes in the United States and Canada, the researchers said.
 

fairsheet

Senator
and some new data...

This winter's wild weather got its start 4,000 years ago, a new study finds.


The roaring jet stream, whose swooping winds drove frigid cold in the East and record warmth in the West this winter, first started twisting and turning about 4,000 years ago, according to a new analysis of ancient rainfall records from North America. Jet stream winds race from west to east, and kinks in the narrow atmospheric current can suck Arctic cold south or hold warm air in place.




http://news.yahoo.com/frigid-winter-blame-4-000-years-wild-jet-174247112.html

Temperatures don't necessarily grow incrementally cooler, from the equator to the poles. The northern and southern jetstreams serve as a divider or "fence" of sorts, between the warmer air closer to the equator and the cooler air closer to the polls.

As you'd expect, the earth seeks to equalize itself. But because of this "fence", it's not quite so simple as the equator "giving" a few degrees to the poles. Although...this "fence" is not inviolate, so an increase at the equator will eventually lead to an increase at the poles.

In the meantime, at least in terms of observable "weather" (that which we see on the news every night!) it's more useful to think of the earth "moving" that fence toward or away from the equator/poles.

So....if it gets warmer at the equator, the earth will move the jetstream south in an attempt at equalization - which of course, draws observable winter weather towards the equator, even as the average temperature of our entire atmosphere may be rising.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Temperatures don't necessarily grow incrementally cooler, from the equator to the poles. The northern and southern jetstreams serve as a divider or "fence" of sorts, between the warmer air closer to the equator and the cooler air closer to the polls.

As you'd expect, the earth seeks to equalize itself. But because of this "fence", it's not quite so simple as the equator "giving" a few degrees to the poles. Although...this "fence" is not inviolate, so an increase at the equator will eventually lead to an increase at the poles.

In the meantime, at least in terms of observable "weather" (that which we see on the news every night!) it's more useful to think of the earth "moving" that fence toward or away from the equator/poles.

So....if it gets warmer at the equator, the earth will move the jetstream south in an attempt at equalization - which of course, draws observable winter weather towards the equator, even as the average temperature of our entire atmosphere may be rising.
I've wondered about the effect of the warming ocean on hurricane development in our future.

Being that a hurricane or tropical cyclone south of the equator develop in a belt around the globe of roughly 40 degrees.

It's roughly 20 degrees North and 20 degrees South latitudes this 40 degree band is where the hot water is that the hurricanes feed off of. So what happens when the ocean warms enough and now the hurricanes/cyclones can develop as far as say 35-40 degrees N/S?

Bigger, stronger, longer lasting and more destructive? Methinks that the scenario is somewhat set and in motion as we speak and only a matter of time.

Glad I don't live on the coast anymore ans life could get interesting in a hurry when the Mother of all storms comes to visit.
 

fairsheet

Senator
I've wondered about the effect of the warming ocean on hurricane development in our future.

Being that a hurricane or tropical cyclone south of the equator develop in a belt around the globe of roughly 40 degrees.

It's roughly 20 degrees North and 20 degrees South latitudes this 40 degree band is where the hot water is that the hurricanes feed off of. So what happens when the ocean warms enough and now the hurricanes/cyclones can develop as far as say 35-40 degrees N/S?

Bigger, stronger, longer lasting and more destructive? Methinks that the scenario is somewhat set and in motion as we speak and only a matter of time.

Glad I don't live on the coast anymore ans life could get interesting in a hurry when the Mother of all storms comes to visit.
Our bigger concern - at least in terms of "total disaster"! is the "ocean conveyor belt" or thermohaline circulation. We don't know what sort of temperature change might disrupt what human civilization has been built around.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Our bigger concern - at least in terms of "total disaster"! is the "ocean conveyor belt" or thermohaline circulation. We don't know what sort of temperature change might disrupt what human civilization has been built around.
There are some schools of thought that the period known as "The Little Ice age" that froze Europe from around 1250 to 1650 was caused by a change in the conveyor in the Atlantic.

More recent studies indicate it's again at risk due to infusions/intrusions of fresh water potentially from massive ice melt due to warming, if this happens again it will be quite disruptive to the entire world.
 

fairsheet

Senator
There are some schools of thought that the period known as "The Little Ice age" that froze Europe from around 1250 to 1650 was caused by a change in the conveyor in the Atlantic.

More recent studies indicate it's again at risk due to infusions/intrusions of fresh water potentially from massive ice melt due to warming, if this happens again it will be quite disruptive to the entire world.
Chances are pretty good that you and I won't be living it - for whatever that's worth. Personally...at least from my personal PNW perspective, I continue to be amazed at the fact that the general "state of nature" is actually considerably better not only than when I was a kid, but per the cataclysms we were expecting and this was BEFORE global warming was indentified. When it's said and done, I'll have lived in a pretty godamned special era. I hope my grandchildren do as well.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Chances are pretty good that you and I won't be living it - for whatever that's worth. Personally...at least from my personal PNW perspective, I continue to be amazed at the fact that the general "state of nature" is actually considerably better not only than when I was a kid, but per the cataclysms we were expecting and this was BEFORE global warming was indentified. When it's said and done, I'll have lived in a pretty godamned special era. I hope my grandchildren do as well.
Amen to that!
 

fairsheet

Senator
Amen to that!
Let's just say that nobody was bitchin' about the bears, the wolves, the coyotes, and the cougars 30 years ago! And, it's not because there was some sort of different balance between their detractors and advocates. It was simply because there were fewer to none of them back then.
 

EatTheRich

President
Does PNW mean "Pacific Northwest"? From what I've seen, that's one of the areas where the local climate is expected to change the least as a result of global warming (unless it gets really out of control). Maybe some landslides ... where I live we might be looking at flooding ... but on the whole not the worst place to be.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Does PNW mean "Pacific Northwest"? From what I've seen, that's one of the areas where the local climate is expected to change the least as a result of global warming (unless it gets really out of control). Maybe some landslides ... where I live we might be looking at flooding ... but on the whole not the worst place to be.
Great place to live until the Cascadia subduction zone cuts loose, just channel 800 mile 30-45 minute monster quake @ +8 or 9 magnitude

*couple of links for you

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/structure/crust/cascadia.php

http://www.commdiginews.com/environment/massive-earthquake-threatens-pacific-northwest-12492/
 
Last edited:

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Wamers need to change their tactic. You start talking pollution, clean air, fertile soil, and clean water, I'm on board with you. It's when you begin saying that man cause's an act that is normal and has been done since the creation of the earth global temperature fluctuations, that's when you lose me and lose the battle.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Wamers need to change their tactic. You start talking pollution, clean air, fertile soil, and clean water, I'm on board with you. It's when you begin saying that man cause's an act that is normal and has been done since the creation of the earth global temperature fluctuations, that's when you lose me and lose the battle.
Just like the fleas on a dog being convinced that they steer the dog. (Grin)
 

Fast Eddy

Mayor
We have had a very mild hurricane and tornado seasons for some time now. We should behaving huge storm problems, but we don't. I see nothing but normal weather changes in everything I look at.
 
Top