Mr. Friscus
Governor
I think nearly noone is denying climate change occurs, it's who or what is responsible and to what extent.
In June. Great point.OMG, it's 67 degrees at 1:03am edt 6/2/14. Must be an ice age coming. LOL
Another iceagenow, com fan. Hilarious.In June. Great point.
http://www.google.com/search?q=co2+temperature+correlation&client=safari&rls=en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=7VSwU-nyPMT3oATnjoLoAQ&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1035&bih=693#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=RGu72VbFLeWFkM%3A;RFH1iTuLfv71rM;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skepticalscience.com%2Fimages%2Fco2_temp_1964_2008.gif;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skepticalscience.com%2FThe-correlation-between-CO2-and-temperature.html;500;329The government keeps saying Global Warming is caused by CO2, but the CO2 rate has increased significantly, but during the last 15 years no temperature increase. Its junk science and is all about the money.
Nope, no correlation. CO2 going up and temperature flat and trending down.
Temperatures were higher in the middle ages. We are at the upper range of our normal cycles and we are heading down. Here is an article that addresses this.Temperature has risen by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit over the last century. It is "flat" over the last 15 years if you arbitrarily compare the coldest year of the 2010s with the hottest year of the 1990s, and ignore the fact that it has remained "flat" at a level well above average.
Not according to Wikipedia:Temperatures were higher in the middle ages. We are at the upper range of our normal cycles and we are heading down. Here is an article that addresses this.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/23/editorial-rigged-science/
Not according to Wikipedia:
Despite substantial uncertainties, especially for the period prior to 1600 for which data are scarce, the warmest period of the last 2,000 years prior to the 20th century very likely occurred between 950 and 1100, but temperatures were probably between 0.1 °C and 0.2 °C below the 1961 to 1990 mean and significantly below the level shown by instrumental data after 1980.
Your splitting hairs. When you get down to a few tents of a degree its like Hillary said, what difference does it make.
Wikipedia is not a good science site to site, there are ongoing battles with them in what they state and present. The are the cool-aid drinkers and only allow warmist data. Many are protesting their stand on this and some things in Physics that they refuse to believe.
I stand by my statements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period
They'll never get up to speed on this.Not according to Wikipedia:
Despite substantial uncertainties, especially for the period prior to 1600 for which data are scarce, the warmest period of the last 2,000 years prior to the 20th century very likely occurred between 950 and 1100, but temperatures were probably between 0.1 °C and 0.2 °C below the 1961 to 1990 mean and significantly below the level shown by instrumental data after 1980.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period
To quote a few higher temperatures and declare a trend is broken is funny. You have no correlation to science. There were more cold records set this year than ever before, let see how many heat records get set this summer.Wow, it's June and it's still 82 out at 10:22pm. Todays temperature reached 88, and tomorrow will be at least 90.
Guess that ice age is taking a break?