Queen Titania
Senator
But but but, does it matter? Is all that I am saying - it seems always, to me, too be a waste of time arguing it when we should be arguing about and fighting for the health of the Planet in far more local and more practical terms - and to plan for and thus build for and grow crops for a changing climate, which is obvious if one is a gardener, - and if, money were taken out of the equation and honesty walked in the door -Rather than to spend time on all of... that.... I'll point out a few things. Yes, landscapes. Such as Pieter Breughel the Elder, 1565, and his The Hunters in the Snow. You can find countless landscapes from this period.
Wind turbines do not kill as many 'beautiful creatures' as some try to claim. Sky scrapers kill far more, as do cars, or any building with windows in it.
The Little Ice Age is not proof that Global Warming, or Climate change, is a fallacy, and that has nothing to do with whether people warmed with wood, coal, or peat. The 'Little Ice Age' was a result of several things, one being volcanic action. In fact, there was also a period in the 6th century as well, which was caused by volcanic action. Amazing nobody tried to claim that as a Little Ice Age. If you choose, you can find out the effects that just the number of Icelandic eruptions had on Europe. Thru out the Middle Ages Volcanic activity caused famine, 'plagues', and climatic disruptions in Europe.
What people refer to as Climate Change is totally different. And I will just leave it go at that.
The worse thing about wind farms is the concrete they sit on -it is erosive as well as it not being very effective, all it does, as far as I can see, is keep our energy in the hands of the biggies to sell back to us - and the £ price of them is just money thrown out of the window -
ps I mentioned wood being used rather than coal because you were trying to blame the back ground of Bruegels paintings on smog ;-)
And he was Flemish - it is always cold there!
Last edited: