Yet another long haired, pot smoking, lefty hippie burnout who pollutes the public airwaves with his crackpot worldview.Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
I know that at least one poster - write on - agrees with Churchill.Ward is a fake native american and a very useful idiot for enemies of the USA.
Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
In the interview with Megyn Kelly, Churchill seemed incensed over the expectation that there might be collateral damage in a war. The very idea of collateral damage from our bombs in the ME left Churchill calling for some sort of retribution involving American lives. Yet.......... the collateral damage in the 9/11 attack (the janitors, firemen, cleaning women killed) was fine with him, it seemed. And the people who worked in the buildings and died there...........were seen as combatants to Churchill. What a warped man he is.Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.
Any action you take is going to have collateral damage. Does Churchill think there was no collateral damage in the 9/11 attacks? War is sloppy, and people die. I don't like it, but unfortunately, like in the case of ISIS, some people do.
Ward Churchill isn't worth the .11 cent .22 bullet it would take to put the POS down for good.Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
When I was in college, I was a long haired pot smoker myself. However, I never subscribed to that kind of blatant hatred as expressed by Churchill. There is a deep and very hard to pronounce psychopathology at work there.Yet another long haired, pot smoking, lefty hippie burnout who pollutes the public airwaves with his crackpot worldview.
The profile seems familiar somehow.
:-/
"Loser" is quite easily pronouncedWhen I was in college, I was a long haired pot smoker myself. However, I never subscribed to that kind of blatant hatred as expressed by Churchill. There is a deep and very hard to pronounce psychopathology at work there.
Actually, Eichmann very clearly stated his belief that the Jews were a threat to Germany which was why he eliminated them. Germany killed 1.7 Jews for every German killed in the war. Meanwhile, the U.S. killed 40 Vietnamese for every American killed during that war. Yet objectively speaking the Vietnamese were no greater threat to Americans then, and Arabs are no greater threat to Americans now, than Jews were to the Germans of the 1940s.Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.
Any action you take is going to have collateral damage. Does Churchill think there was no collateral damage in the 9/11 attacks? War is sloppy, and people die. I don't like it, but unfortunately, like in the case of ISIS, some people do.
The Nazis' (I prefer to give Germans a break) avowed aim in exterminating Jews was genocide. I don't see how one can make that claim against the Americans vis-à-vis the Vietnamese.Actually, Eichmann very clearly stated his belief that the Jews were a threat to Germany which was why he eliminated them. Germany killed 1.7 Jews for every German killed in the war. Meanwhile, the U.S. killed 40 Vietnamese for every American killed during that war. Yet objectively speaking the Vietnamese were no greater threat to Americans then, and Arabs are no greater threat to Americans now, than Jews were to the Germans of the 1940s.
Churchill is a person who seems a bit out of sorts. He'd probably have trouble destroying an ant den.Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-23427726 <--- American officers ordered soldiers to "kill anything that moves," while several were fired because their body counts were too low.The Nazis' (I prefer to give Germans a break) avowed aim in exterminating Jews was genocide. I don't see how one can make that claim against the Americans vis-à-vis the Vietnamese.