New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

PJPoll: Ward Churchill

Do you agree with Ward Churchill's point of view regarding 9/11? Does the US deserve to be bombed?

  • Yes to the first question only. There is a moral equivalent between the 3000 dead and Eichmann.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes to the second question only. The US didn't deserve 9/11 but deserves to be bombed now.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes to both questions. The US has done many wrong things. The chickens should come home to roost.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Some other response

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .

Jen

Senator
Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
Yet another long haired, pot smoking, lefty hippie burnout who pollutes the public airwaves with his crackpot worldview.

The profile seems familiar somehow.

:-/
 

Colorforms

Senator
Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.

Any action you take is going to have collateral damage. Does Churchill think there was no collateral damage in the 9/11 attacks? War is sloppy, and people die. I don't like it, but unfortunately, like in the case of ISIS, some people do.
 

Jen

Senator
Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.

Any action you take is going to have collateral damage. Does Churchill think there was no collateral damage in the 9/11 attacks? War is sloppy, and people die. I don't like it, but unfortunately, like in the case of ISIS, some people do.
In the interview with Megyn Kelly, Churchill seemed incensed over the expectation that there might be collateral damage in a war. The very idea of collateral damage from our bombs in the ME left Churchill calling for some sort of retribution involving American lives. Yet.......... the collateral damage in the 9/11 attack (the janitors, firemen, cleaning women killed) was fine with him, it seemed. And the people who worked in the buildings and died there...........were seen as combatants to Churchill. What a warped man he is.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Yet another long haired, pot smoking, lefty hippie burnout who pollutes the public airwaves with his crackpot worldview.

The profile seems familiar somehow.

:-/
When I was in college, I was a long haired pot smoker myself. However, I never subscribed to that kind of blatant hatred as expressed by Churchill. There is a deep and very hard to pronounce psychopathology at work there.
 

EatTheRich

President
Eichmann was a NAZI who reveled in the genocide of Jews simply because of stark bigotry. Much of what we do overseas is take out targets that may be a threat to the US. It's the government's job, despite Barry's interpretation, to protect the American people.

Any action you take is going to have collateral damage. Does Churchill think there was no collateral damage in the 9/11 attacks? War is sloppy, and people die. I don't like it, but unfortunately, like in the case of ISIS, some people do.
Actually, Eichmann very clearly stated his belief that the Jews were a threat to Germany which was why he eliminated them. Germany killed 1.7 Jews for every German killed in the war. Meanwhile, the U.S. killed 40 Vietnamese for every American killed during that war. Yet objectively speaking the Vietnamese were no greater threat to Americans then, and Arabs are no greater threat to Americans now, than Jews were to the Germans of the 1940s.
 

BitterPill

The Shoe Cometh
Supporting Member
Actually, Eichmann very clearly stated his belief that the Jews were a threat to Germany which was why he eliminated them. Germany killed 1.7 Jews for every German killed in the war. Meanwhile, the U.S. killed 40 Vietnamese for every American killed during that war. Yet objectively speaking the Vietnamese were no greater threat to Americans then, and Arabs are no greater threat to Americans now, than Jews were to the Germans of the 1940s.
The Nazis' (I prefer to give Germans a break) avowed aim in exterminating Jews was genocide. I don't see how one can make that claim against the Americans vis-à-vis the Vietnamese.
 

BitterPill

The Shoe Cometh
Supporting Member
Is Ward Churchill a truth teller for the state of things in the USA?
Or is Ward Churchill of the mindset that will destroy our nation?
Churchill is a person who seems a bit out of sorts. He'd probably have trouble destroying an ant den.
 

fairsheet

Senator
Until now, I didn't know this guy was even a real person! I assumed he was a convenient boogey-man made up by our vaunted media. Whatever...I'll take him about as seriously as I do "Mr. Clean" and "Tony the Tiger".
 
Top