New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Daffy Duck Economics

Flanders

Council Member
Hillary Clinton’s record on foreign policy leaves a lot to be desired; the Arab Spring, Benghazi, the Russian reset, treating enemies like friends:

Has Hillary ever been right?
Pat Buchanan wants Syrians, Turks, Kurds and Iraqis to take care of ISIS
Published: 08/28/2014 at 7:51 PM
Patrick J. Buchanan

http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/has-hillary-ever-been-right/

Now, Hillary Clinton is challenging Joe Biden’s record for never being right about anything. Believe it or not being wrong is a plus for Democrats as Biden proved throughout his long disgraceful political life. Clinton wants the record in the event Biden seeks the nomination in 2016. Can you hear those two debating who was “Right” on this, that, or the other thing? Biden has been wrong about everything for a long time; so Hillary has to play catchup by being wrong about a big one —— job creation:


Bill and Hill must have learned their arithmetic from Daffy Duck.


1. Everybody has a job under slavery. Socialists even brag about it:

From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs. Karl Marx
2. Hillary Clinton’s federal government is creating tax-dollar millionaires/billionaires at an alarming rate while they are eliminating a productive private sector middle class. That is exactly what Karl Marx’s little gem means when it is put in practice.

3. Only jobs where paychecks are issued by a government agency are listed as government jobs. So government-created jobs paid with tax dollars enslave the people forced to pay the salaries as well as enslaving the job recipients even though the paychecks are issued by a “private company.” Examples: Companies created by HillaryCare II, and so-called renewable energy companies. Loony Tune bookkeeping allows Hillary to claim the federal government creates jobs when it only creates more slaves at the expense of individual liberties.

4. America only started going downhill when the federal government began to control the economy through the tax on income. Taqiyya the Liar accelerated the decline to the speed of sound; Hillary Clinton wants to put it in warp drive.


5. An economy controlled by the federal government requires maintaining a large pool of unemployed illegal immigrants. That unskilled labor force must be supplemented by welfare state programs. This is being accomplished through open-borders. Supplementing unemployed, unskilled labor, and calling it cheap labor is the daffiest item in a Daffy Duck economy.

6. Americans alone were the only ones hurt in the Great Depression, yet many of those Americans threw away the freedoms they had by turning to collectivism rather than demanding more, not fewer, freedoms from government. Question: What will those millions of illegal aliens turn to when the next Great Depression is caused by the federal government’s totalitarian policies? Hint: They arrive with a fool’s belief in benign totalitarian government. In short: Their biggest complaint is that the governments in the countries they fled do not take care of them. Taqiyya the Liar’s late aunt was the poster child for illegal immigrant thinking:

 
Last edited:
Hillary Clinton’s record on foreign policy leaves a lot to be desired; the Arab Spring, Benghazi, the Russian reset, treating enemies like friends:

Has Hillary ever been right?
Pat Buchanan wants Syrians, Turks, Kurds and Iraqis to take care of ISIS
Published: 08/28/2014 at 7:51 PM
Patrick J. Buchanan

http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/has-hillary-ever-been-right/

Now, Hillary Clinton is challenging Joe Biden’s record for never being right about anything. Believe it or not being wrong is a plus for Democrats as Biden proved throughout his long disgraceful political life. Clinton wants the record in the event Biden seeks the nomination in 2016. Can you hear those two debating who was “Right” on this, that, or the other thing? Biden has been wrong about everything for a long time; so Hillary has to play catchup by being wrong about a big one —— job creation:


Bill and Hill must have learned their arithmetic from Daffy Duck.


1. Everybody has a job under slavery. Socialists even brag about it:


2. Hillary Clinton’s federal government is creating tax-dollar millionaires/billionaires at an alarming rate while they are eliminating a productive private sector middle class. That is exactly what Karl Marx’s little gem means when it is put in practice.

3. Only jobs where paychecks are issued by a government agency are listed as government jobs. So government-created jobs paid with tax dollars enslave the people forced to pay the salaries as well as enslaving the job recipients even though the paychecks are issued by a “private company.” Examples: Companies created by HillaryCare II, and so-called renewable energy companies. Loony Tune bookkeeping allows Hillary to claim the federal government creates jobs when it only creates more slaves at the expense of individual liberties.

4. America only started going downhill when the federal government began to control the economy through the tax on income. Taqiyya the Liar accelerated the decline to the speed of sound; Hillary Clinton wants to put it in warp drive.


5. An economy controlled by the federal government requires maintaining a large pool of unemployed illegal immigrants. That unskilled labor force must be supplemented by welfare state programs. This is being accomplished through open-borders. Supplementing unemployed, unskilled labor, and calling it cheap labor is the daffiest item in a Daffy Duck economy.

6. Americans alone were the only ones hurt in the Great Depression, yet many of those Americans threw away the freedoms they had by turning to collectivism rather than demanding more, not fewer, freedoms from government. Question: What will those millions of illegal aliens turn to when the next Great Depression is caused by the federal government’s totalitarian policies? Hint: They arrive with a fool’s belief in benign totalitarian government. In short: Their biggest complaint is that the governments in the countries they fled do not take care of them. Taqiyya the Liar’s late aunt was the poster child for illegal immigrant thinking:

Nice rant. The story you painted is straight from the tea bagger files. In many ways, the right is now a cult where virtue is measured by money and value is solely represented by a number in an account. The funny thing is that most of the people who believe in this distorted view of humanity are actually quite poor and very bad at making money.
 

Flanders

Council Member
Nice rant. The story you painted is straight from the tea bagger files.

To Woolleybugger: Tea Parties came about because of Taqiyya the Liar’s policies. I expressed the same economic views long before the Tea Party Movement got started.


In many ways, the right is now a cult where virtue is measured by money and value is solely represented by a number in an account.
To Woolleybugger: That’s corkscrew logic. You might just as well say that today’s conservatives joined a cult started by America’s Founders in order to reinstate the Constitution. A desire for severely limited government can hardly be called a cult.

In truth, living on tax dollars is the only virtue to the parasite class; so confiscating somebody else’s money becomes a virtue to liberals while working for money becomes a sin.


The funny thing is that most of the people who believe in this distorted view of humanity
To Woolleybugger: In case you haven’t noticed, labor is converted to money. In effect, taxes are paid with labor. Under collectivist governments it becomes a distorted view of humanity when anyone works for themself and their loved ones instead of being forced to work for strangers. A natural hatred of totalitarian collectivism is far from a distorted view of humanity; especially when ‘humanity’ is defined by the Socialist priesthood.

NOTE: There has never been a priesthood that did not lust after the authority to tax everyone. If Roman Catholics, or Muslims, or Buddhists etc. did to non-believers the things Socialists did there would have been a bloody revolution decades ago.


are actually quite poor and very bad at making money.
To Woolleybugger: Non-parasites are very bad at keeping money they work for when the government takes it away from them. The parasite class would be the poorest by far without the welfare state —— as they should be.
 

Fast Eddy

Mayor
Hillary is an idiot and is only out done in the gaff department by Joe Biden. She usually end up waking back half of what she said.
She is an idealog just like Obama that has a uber progressive agenda. She suffers from potty mouth to boot.
 
The notion that Tea Baggers represent the founding principles is about as true as the other nonsense in your post. What they represent is a modern opinion on what they think the founders intended. They do this by cherry picking founders to gain support for their own views. In order to believe in this stuff, one has to ignore the entire history of the nation post ratification. In essence, the tea bagger solution to everything is to return to the Articles and ignore the constitution altogether. Just admit it, you really don't like what America turned into starting in about 1790. And yes, the tea bagger version of conservatism slushing around with libertarianism blessed by Jesus and dressed up in an 18th century costume is nothing more than the trappings of a cult. Gibberish aside, you got nothing.
 

Flanders

Council Member
The notion that Tea Baggers represent the founding principles is about as true as the other nonsense in your post. What they represent is a modern opinion on what they think the founders intended. They do this by cherry picking founders to gain support for their own views.
To Woolleybugger: Do you truly believe that liberal opinions on disarming the people, on abortion, on euthanasia, on illegal immigration, on importing diseases, on brainwashing children, and on and on the list goes are closer to original intent than the views of a conservative?

In order to believe in this stuff, one has to ignore the entire history of the nation post ratification. In essence, the tea bagger solution to everything is to return to the Articles and ignore the constitution altogether.
To Woolleybugger: Liberals first ignored Article V. The amendment process in the Constitution was put there to make changes:

Article V​

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.​

Once Article V was rendered useless by liberals they had a free hand to impose their opinions on the country by passing unconstitutional laws which their judges then ruled constitutional. The parasite class grew in tandem with tax collector’s morality.

Just admit it, you really don't like what America turned into starting in about 1790.
To Woolleybugger: America was the greatest country in the world until 1913. I do not like what America turned into after 1913.

And yes, the tea bagger version of conservatism slushing around with libertarianism blessed by Jesus and dressed up in an 18th century costume is nothing more than the trappings of a cult.
To Woolleybugger: Socialism is the cult. And just like every other religious cult the fanatics hate every religion except their own. The thing that makes them the most angry is that except for Islam, Supreme Deity religions survive on voluntary participation while Socialism/Communism requires force. Note that Socialism and Taqiyya the Liar’s favorite religion ——Islam —— are both theocracies.

Gibberish aside, you got nothing.
To Woolleybugger: I got the Bill of Rights and Janice Rogers Brown. Parenthetically, it was then-Senator Taqiyya’s opposition to Judge Brown that first put me wise to the Chicago sewer rat.


October 27, 2014 4:00 AM
On ‘Repointing’ the Constitution
It is not for judges to stand above the Constitution and impose their version of justice.
By Quin Hillyer

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/391191/repointing-constitution-quin-hillyer
 
To Woolleybugger: Do you truly believe that liberal opinions on disarming the people, on abortion, on euthanasia, on illegal immigration, on importing diseases, on brainwashing children, and on and on the list goes are closer to original intent than the views of a conservative?



To Woolleybugger: Liberals first ignored Article V. The amendment process in the Constitution was put there to make changes:

Article V​

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.​

Once Article V was rendered useless by liberals they had a free hand to impose their opinions on the country by passing unconstitutional laws which their judges then ruled constitutional. The parasite class grew in tandem with tax collector’s morality.



To Woolleybugger: America was the greatest country in the world until 1913. I do not like what America turned into after 1913.



To Woolleybugger: Socialism is the cult. And just like every other religious cult the fanatics hate every religion except their own. The thing that makes them the most angry is that except for Islam, Supreme Deity religions survive on voluntary participation while Socialism/Communism requires force. Note that Socialism and Taqiyya the Liar’s favorite religion ——Islam —— are both theocracies.



To Woolleybugger: I got the Bill of Rights and Janice Rogers Brown. Parenthetically, it was then-Senator Taqiyya’s opposition to Judge Brown that first put me wise to the Chicago sewer rat.


October 27, 2014 4:00 AM
On ‘Repointing’ the Constitution
It is not for judges to stand above the Constitution and impose their version of justice.
By Quin Hillyer

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/391191/repointing-constitution-quin-hillyer
The problem with dealing with people like you is volume. Let's try this one at a time.

The amendment process which you seem to think is part of this discussion is fairly well understood and there is no disagreement between the parties. The constitution is very clear on how to amend the constitution and to the best of my knowledge, no liberal has yet circumvented it to pass an amendment. Now there was one Republican President who got a few minor ones passed after the Civil War that did not exactly embrace the notion that the traitorous rebel states should have a vote in protecting us from further inequities such as slavery but let's not quibble here. Lincoln may have stretched it a bit but he did it for a good reason.
 
Now lets do the Bill of Rights and Janice Brown. The BOR is fairly straightforward, it protects the citizens from the federal and state government by giving us protected rights. Since language is a limitation upon meaning, there have been countless cases over the last 220 years explaining the meaning of these amendments and subsequent amendments which prove that language can be a limiting factor when dealing with complex subjects. The BOR are not the 10 commandments, they are simply 10 amendments which were thought by all to be necessary at the time. At no time did anyone think that this was the last of the amendments, that is why they explained to us how to amend the constitution in expectation that it would be amended in the future.

What we have hear is a failure of comprehension and a selective understanding of history. This is yet another proof of the bizarre world a tea bagger inhabits. It is a world of mystery even to a tea bagger because when you ask a tea bagger to explain themselves, you get gibberish like the post you just bored me with.
 
Now lets do the Bill of Rights and Janice Brown. The BOR is fairly straightforward, it protects the citizens from the federal and state government by giving us protected rights. Since language is a limitation upon meaning, there have been countless cases over the last 220 years explaining the meaning of these amendments and subsequent amendments which prove that language can be a limiting factor when dealing with complex subjects. The BOR are not the 10 commandments, they are simply 10 amendments which were thought by all to be necessary at the time. At no time did anyone think that this was the last of the amendments, that is why they explained to us how to amend the constitution in expectation that it would be amended in the future.

What we have hear is a failure of comprehension and a selective understanding of history. This is yet another proof of the bizarre world a tea bagger inhabits. It is a world of mystery even to a tea bagger because when you ask a tea bagger to explain themselves, you get gibberish like the post you just bored me with.
I see that you rated this dumb or some such nonsense. What I see in your posts is a propensity to equate volume of debris with a beaver dam. Next time, try building your arguments one by one instead of throwing a plate of spaghetti against the wall and hoping it makes a design.
 

SW48

Administrator
Staff member
Supporting Member
I had to watch the video twice to make sure I heard it correctly.

Did Hillary Clinton just say "don't let anyone tell you its corporations and businesses that create jobs"?

Holy $&@^
 

Flanders

Council Member
The constitution is very clear on how to amend the constitution and to the best of my knowledge, no liberal has yet circumvented it to pass an amendment.

To Woolleybugger: Another liberal who lacks reading comprehension skills:


Once Article V was rendered useless by liberals they had a free hand to impose their opinions on the country by passing unconstitutional laws which their judges then ruled constitutional. The parasite class grew in tandem with tax collector’s morality.
In plain English, trying to get an amendment passed in accordance with Article V is NOT circumventing the Constitution. That’s the way it is supposed to be done.

Personal attacks on anyone who opposes the programs and policies of Democrat parasites is not an argument. Also, touchy-feely moralizing is the standard defense liberal freaks always fallback on in order to defend their spot at the public trough. It does not work with me. In the future you might try defending liberals by making a case for any one of their policies.


I had to watch the video twice to make sure I heard it correctly.

Did Hillary Clinton just say "don't let anyone tell you its corporations and businesses that create jobs"?

Holy $&@^
To SW48: She really stepped in it:

 

SW48

Administrator
Staff member
Supporting Member
To Woolleybugger: Another liberal who lacks reading comprehension skills:



In plain English, trying to get an amendment passed in accordance with Article V is NOT circumventing the Constitution. That’s the way it is supposed to be done.

Personal attacks on anyone who opposes the programs and policies of Democrat parasites is not an argument. Also, touchy-feely moralizing is the standard defense liberal freaks always fallback on in order to defend their spot at the public trough. It does not work with me. In the future you might try defending liberals by making a case for any one of their policies.




To SW48: She really stepped in it:

I am not a Hillary basher and thought if she were to be president that she would get the job done. This comment and the followup comment where she talks about Bill were disappointing and very unpresidential. I hope her speeches going forward don't talk about Bill this and Bill that.
 

Flanders

Council Member
I am not a Hillary basher
To SW48: Nobody wants Hillary to get her party’s nomination more than I. She would be the easiest Dem of all to beat in the general election. A pushover is essential if one of the Republicans being groomed by the media gets the Republican nomination.

and thought if she were to be president that she would get the job done.
To SW48: Her only job is to make Bill the UN’s Secretary General. The objective has always been President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bubba saving the world together.

This comment and the followup comment where she talks about Bill were disappointing and very unpresidential.
To SW48: Don’t sweat it. The global government crowd has so much invested in the Clintons the media will back her no matter what she says or does.

I hope her speeches going forward don't talk about Bill this and Bill that.
To SW48: She does not have to talk about him. Clinton surrogates will take care of it. She certainly will not mention Bill and the United Nations, but she is nothing without him. Put it this way. If Bill passes away do you honestly think she has a chance for the nomination let alone the presidency?
 
To Woolleybugger: Another liberal who lacks reading comprehension skills:



In plain English, trying to get an amendment passed in accordance with Article V is NOT circumventing the Constitution. That’s the way it is supposed to be done.

Personal attacks on anyone who opposes the programs and policies of Democrat parasites is not an argument. Also, touchy-feely moralizing is the standard defense liberal freaks always fallback on in order to defend their spot at the public trough. It does not work with me. In the future you might try defending liberals by making a case for any one of their policies.




To SW48: She really stepped in it:

What exactly is your point other than to ignore your point? What unconstitutional statement or policy violates the amendment process?
 

Flanders

Council Member
I never watched a State of the Union. EVER. In the past I did breeze through transcripts. Taqiyya the Liar finally reduced the SOTH to reading headlines for me. That’s all anyone needs because the man lies about everything. This morning's headlines told me he is lying about the economy. He is still lying about the “middle class” without distinguishing between the GOVERNMENT MIDDLE CLASS and THE PRIVATE SECTOR MIDDLE CLASS. The fact is that pivate sector unemployment is at 10 percent —— PERMANENTLY —— thanks to Taqiyya & Company. Sadly, those who are supposed to inform the American people never tell the public the truth so the lie about an improving economy stands.

3. Only jobs where paychecks are issued by a government agency are listed as government jobs. So government-created jobs paid with tax dollars enslave the people forced to pay the salaries as well as enslaving the job recipients even though the paychecks are issued by a “private company.” Examples: Companies created by HillaryCare II, and so-called renewable energy companies.
 
Top