no, but i can read.Are you THE Doctor Phil?
Wassup?
;-)
wassup.
no, but i can read.Are you THE Doctor Phil?
Wassup?
;-)
are you an eyewitness?Are you THE Doctor Phil?
Wassup?
;-)
sure i do. i can opine just the same as you can.You have no idea what the evidence shows. You're not in the grand jury room.
That's ridiculous. When people who are not in the grand jury room insist that they know the evidence presented to the grand jury, we are into the surreal.sure i do. i can opine just the same as you can.
You're yakking about my supposed suspicions. My post was not about that - it's about the complete lack of transparency since the day the kid was killed. That's what created the unrest in the beginning, and the secret legal proceedings just make things worse.Alright, Bugsy....
You're suspicious about whether or not the Grand Jury is hearing ALL the evidence because nothing damning of Wilson is being leaked?
What if everything being leaked was damning of Wilson and nothing was damning of Brown? Would you still be feeling that the GJ isn't hearing the evidence? Would you worry that Wilson wasn't getting a fair deal?
Brown's friend, who claimed he witnessed Brown being shot from behind admitted he lied.
He admitted he lied after the autopsy proved he did.
The forensic evidence also proves that the people who said that Brown only attempted to step away from the patrol car also lied. His DNA is inside the car. The wound to his hand and the blood spatter inside the car also support this finding. Witness testimony also speaks to exactly what the forensic evidence concludes.
And the process I criticized above maximizes the chances that there will be riots. You seem to have no interest in avoiding riots, and you may even hope for them to justify your hate.Once again...
If the result isn't what the Fergies want and they go apeshit and riot. Send the ones that are arrested (rioting and looting) to Liberia to perform community service.
uh, ok. we should not form opinion based on anecdotal recollections of various persons then...That's ridiculous. When people who are not in the grand jury room insist that they know the evidence presented to the grand jury, we are into the surreal.
One wonders why.
http://pathologyexpert.blogspot.com/2014/10/forensic-sound-bites-half-truths.htmluh, ok. we should not form opinion based on anecdotal recollections of various persons then...
Precisely!uh, ok. we should not form opinion based on anecdotal recollections of various persons then...
Amazing.
But her report indicated the same thing. The wound to the thumb was at close range with gunpowder particles. What do YOU think that means?Amazing.
Lights years different than the supposed "opinions" of that woman being bandied about in right wing media (and even in legit media).
Another object lesson in how right wing lies are born.
I would, and the process is public. We are supposed to learn the Grand Jury's decision when it is announced, not through selective leaks.You wouldn't have confidence in the process if it were public.
Hello? I don't pretend to be able to analyze the evidence, especially evidence we haven't seen that can only be analyzed by experts in any event.But her report indicated the same thing. The wound to the thumb was at close range with gunpowder particles. What do YOU think that means?
You'd have to be a winger to qualify to analyze information you've never seen.Hello? I don't pretend to be able to analyze the evidence, especially evidence we haven't seen that can only be analyzed by experts in any event.
Especially when one needs special expertise to analyze the evidence one has never seen.You'd have to be a winger to qualify to analyze information you've never seen.
What I think the evidence is? It's not about waht I think. This is what has come out, and I'm sorry if you have a hard time accepting that.You're yakking about my supposed suspicions. My post was not about that - it's about the complete lack of transparency since the day the kid was killed. That's what created the unrest in the beginning, and the secret legal proceedings just make things worse.
I'm not real interested in your selective use of what you think the evidence is - you assume the cop did nothing wrong without knowing the evidence submitted to the grand jury.
I've tried to explain all this to them multiple times; the problem is that many right here on this board have also tried and convicted Officer Wilson. So it doesn't matter what those of us who are local see in the paper every day all day. This case has 41 FBI investigators on it not to mention the Department of Justice. The evidence will be made public.They will be able to see all the evidence once the Grand Jury reaches a decision.
No comment on protecting the integrity of the witnesses testimony? Justice is blind as the saying goes and all Grand Juries operate in secrecy. There's nothing nefarious about the use of a Grand Jury in this case.
You're wrong. As someone who lives in the area, I've read every article in the local paper and seen many local news casts about the Ferguson protests, and I can tell you that the protestors have already tried and convicted Officer Wilson. It doesn't matter what the evidence is - there will be chaos if they don't get the verdict they're demanding.
Maybe this will clear things up for youI said it from the outset - the use of secret grand jury proceedings in the Michael Brown case was a horrible blunder, especially if no charges are brought.
No one can have any confidence in the process, as no one knows what is going on. Are the grand jurors being given all available evidence implicating Wilson? No one knows, but the "leak campaign" provides no cause for optimism. It's a leak campaign consisting of only one-sided opinions damning Brown and clearing Wilson. There has to be SOME evidence critical of Wilson, right? Eyewitness testimony, etc. But have you heard any such leaks from the grand jury proceedings? Nope.
So, if no charges are brought, it will be seen as an outrage. A whitewash. All due to the decision to do everything in darkness. A great way to ensure more unrest.
Downright dopey.