New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

OK, theory time. What do YOU think happened with Wilson's shooting of Brown?

Colorforms

Senator
Having pity on you, I point out that the word is spelled "retarded." People who are not retarded know that.

;-)
Feel free to create whatever fantasy that allows you to pretend you're superior and avoid your own lies all you want. I almost never use the term "retard". It's a term I save for the most extreme cases. You qualify.
 

trapdoor

Governor
Of course you don't "have to" have anything. This is an intellectual/analytical exercise. Meet the challenge or not, as you see fit.

And there is plenty of evidence supporting my theory - that Brown turned around to surrender and Wilson then pumped him full of bullets. I still don't know your theory on that, as you just say you don't "have to" provide one. True. Let me know if you can rise to that challenge.
The physical evidence doesn't support your theory. I provided mine. Brown turned and charged, and was shot -- all bullets hit him from in front, and none were fired down at him "execution style" as you describe earlier in this thread. Why Brown did what he did? I don't know any more than I know why he stole the cigars.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
The physical evidence doesn't support your theory. I provided mine. Brown turned and charged, and was shot -- all bullets hit him from in front, and none were fired down at him "execution style" as you describe earlier in this thread. Why Brown did what he did? I don't know any more than I know why he stole the cigars.
You say the physical evidence supports your theory, but you don't provide the theory.

My theory, laid out above, is that Brown stopped running, turned around, offered himself up for surrender, and was pumped full of bullets. A perfectly rational explanation for why Brown stopped running and turned around, and completely consistent with the evidence.

Asked to provide your own theory, or critique mine, you offer nothing.

That's quite telling.
 

trapdoor

Governor
You say the physical evidence supports your theory, but you don't provide the theory.

My theory, laid out above, is that Brown stopped running, turned around, offered himself up for surrender, and was pumped full of bullets. A perfectly rational explanation for why Brown stopped running and turned around, and completely consistent with the evidence.

Asked to provide your own theory, or critique mine, you offer nothing.

That's quite telling.
I provided the theory about what happened. In fact, I've now provided it at least three times in two different threads. You want me to speculate on why it happened, and I have no basis for doing so.

My theory, as already stated, is that Brown assaulted the officer, ran briefly, and turned to resume the assault, and was shot while charging the officer as witnesses testified. Again, this is in keeping with the physical evidence which shows that all bullets were fired from in front, and none were fired down as your theory requires.
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
I provided the theory about what happened. In fact, I've now provided it at least three times in two different threads. You want me to speculate on why it happened, and I have no basis for doing so.

My theory, as already stated, is that Brown assaulted the officer, ran briefly, and turned to resume the assault, and was shot while charging the officer as witnesses testified. Again, this is in keeping with the physical evidence which shows that all bullets were fired from in front, and none were fired down as your theory requires.
He was "shot while charging the officer?" That makes no sense whatsoever.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
I provided the theory about what happened. In fact, I've now provided it at least three times in two different threads. You want me to speculate on why it happened, and I have no basis for doing so.

My theory, as already stated, is that Brown assaulted the officer, ran briefly, and turned to resume the assault, and was shot while charging the officer as witnesses testified. Again, this is in keeping with the physical evidence which shows that all bullets were fired from in front, and none were fired down as your theory requires.
As you know, my theory does not require shots fired while Brown was still fleeing. That may have happened, especially if such shots missed, but we just don't know.

But then you provide a theory, while oddly denying that you are doing so. Your stated theory is that, after being shot by Wilson near his police car, Brown ran from Wilson, Wilson chased him with his gun, and Brown then "turned to resume the assault" and was "charging the officer." Thus, your theory is that, after running from the shooter, Brown changed his mind and decided to run toward the shooter, thereby making it easier for the shooter to shoot him some more.

Seriously, that makes sense to you?
 

Sunset Rose

Mayor
Supporting Member
As you know, my theory does not require shots fired while Brown was still fleeing. That may have happened, especially if such shots missed, but we just don't know.

But then you provide a theory, while oddly denying that you are doing so. Your stated theory is that, after being shot by Wilson near his police car, Brown ran from Wilson, Wilson chased him with his gun, and Brown then "turned to resume the assault" and was "charging the officer." Thus, your theory is that, after running from the shooter, Brown changed his mind and decided to run toward the shooter, thereby making it easier for the shooter to shoot him some more.

Seriously, that makes sense to you?
I bet it does make sense to Trapdoor.:(
 
As you know, my theory does not require shots fired while Brown was still fleeing. That may have happened, especially if such shots missed, but we just don't know.

But then you provide a theory, while oddly denying that you are doing so. Your stated theory is that, after being shot by Wilson near his police car, Brown ran from Wilson, Wilson chased him with his gun, and Brown then "turned to resume the assault" and was "charging the officer." Thus, your theory is that, after running from the shooter, Brown changed his mind and decided to run toward the shooter, thereby making it easier for the shooter to shoot him some more.

Seriously, that makes sense to you?
The crime scene diagram shows you are wrong in your scenario. Rather where the casing and the body were found support the officer's version of the incident easily.
 

trapdoor

Governor
As you know, my theory does not require shots fired while Brown was still fleeing. That may have happened, especially if such shots missed, but we just don't know.

But then you provide a theory, while oddly denying that you are doing so. Your stated theory is that, after being shot by Wilson near his police car, Brown ran from Wilson, Wilson chased him with his gun, and Brown then "turned to resume the assault" and was "charging the officer." Thus, your theory is that, after running from the shooter, Brown changed his mind and decided to run toward the shooter, thereby making it easier for the shooter to shoot him some more.

Seriously, that makes sense to you?
It makes perfect sense to me, but then, I've been in a fight before. Rational behavior seldom takes place in a fight.
 

trapdoor

Governor
I don't know what your point is, but it's not relevant to my question.
It most definitely is relevant. If a person charges someone, their body is angled forward, and the flight of the bullets hitting them would reflect that angle. For your theory to be possible, the shot to the top of the head would have been fired while Brown was falling, or going down, and would reflect a different angle, it would have appeared to the ME to have struck brown from above, not from in front. At this point, I shouldn't have to remind you that the ME (and Brown's parent's separate medical review) said all rounds came from in front.
 
Top