New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Ignore The Standard Environmental Lies

Flanders

Council Member
Repeatedly going over all of the lies coming out of Gina McCarthy's EPA’s is an exercise in futility. She, along with every global warming environmental parasite, only laugh at everybody else. The little freak makes no pretense:


Members of Congress are probably well-aware of every EPA lie cited in a terrific, fact-filled, piece by Stephen Moore and Kathleen Hartnett White; nevertheless, Congress should not waste time on the well-known environmental lies the public has been hearing for decades and zero in on the United Nations.

. . . the overall reductions in the planetary volume of carbon-dioxide emissions would be microscopic — like trying to reduce the rise of the oceans with a syringe. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s own official number crunchers say that we must reduce global carbon-dioxide emissions by 80 percent over the next several decades to avert catastrophic warming. The EPA’s proposed cut would yield an immeasurable 0.018 degree Celsius cooling.​

This is going to save the planet from catastrophe? Good luck.​

Think Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Was Outrageous? Check Out What He’s Doing at the EPA.
Stephen Moore / Kathleen Hartnett White / December 07, 2014

http://dailysignal.com/2014/12/07/think-obamas-executive-action-on-immigration-was-outrageous-check-out-what-hes-doing-at-the-epa/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

The EPA is a de facto United Nations agency. Everything that comes from the EPA originates in the United Nations. With that in mind it might be easier to defund the UN than it is to rein-in the Clean Air Act the way the EPA treats it as though it is untouchable. My reasoning tells me that Democrats will not be too quick to defend the United Nations the way they defend the EPA.

Finally, for years I’ve suggested this is the perfect fighting song to lead the charge against the UN:


 
Last edited:

Fast Eddy

Mayor
I keep hoping that Congress will defund and roll back the scope of the EPA. This has turned into a push global warming and try to control every aspect of our lives. They are making a move to control all water. Outlawed Coal and we will have power shortages and increased prices because of it. They use junk science or no science and just say what they want to justify things. The EPA is an evil organization and the people running it should be in jail.
 

Flanders

Council Member
I keep hoping that Congress will defund and roll back the scope of the EPA. This has turned into a push global warming and try to control every aspect of our lives. They are making a move to control all water. Outlawed Coal and we will have power shortages and increased prices because of it. They use junk science or no science and just say what they want to justify things.
To Fast Eddy: Absolutely.

The EPA is an evil organization and the people running it should be in jail.
To Fast Eddy: I’d go so far as to say that bureaucrats who betray this country to the United Nations should be charged with treason. Membership in the UN means that no elected American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf can be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that. Not so with bureaucrats.
 

Flanders

Council Member
The indisputable facts in Alan Caruba’s piece nail the EPA:

The United States has plenty of enemies in the world that want it to fail. It is insane that we harbor one as a federal agency.

The New Congress Must Save the USA from the EPA
By Alan Caruba December 10, 2014

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/68211

Mr. Caruba did not tie into the United Nations; so once again I’ll remind everybody that HR 1146 is still in the hopper:

To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009'.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS PARTICIPATION ACT.

(a) Repeal- The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-264; 22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is repealed.

(b) Termination of Participation in United Nations- The President shall terminate all participation by the United States in the United Nations, and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.

(c) Closure of United States Mission to United Nations- The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT ACT.

(a) Repeal- The United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act (Public Law 80-357) is repealed.

(b) Withdrawal- The United States withdraws from the agreement between the United States of America and the United Nations regarding the headquarters of the United Nations (signed at Lake Success, New York, on June 26, 1947, which was brought into effect by the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act).

SEC. 4. UNITED STATES ASSESSED AND VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS.

(a) Termination- No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for assessed or voluntary contributions of the United States to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, except that funds may be appropriated to facilitate withdrawal of United States personnel and equipment. Upon termination of United States membership, no payments shall be made to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, out of any funds appropriated prior to such termination or out of any other funds available for such purposes.

(b) Application- The provisions of this section shall apply to all agencies of the United Nations, including independent or voluntary agencies.

SEC. 5. UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS.

(a) Termination- No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any United States contribution to any United Nations military operation.

(b) Terminations of United States Participation in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations- No funds may be obligated or expended to support the participation of any member of the Armed Forces of the United States as part of any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force. No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations.

SEC. 6. WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED NATIONS PRESENCE IN FACILITIES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND REPEAL OF DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY.

(a) Withdrawal From United States Government Property- The United Nations (including any affiliated agency of the United Nations) shall not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.

(b) Diplomatic Immunity- No officer or employee of the United Nations or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288, 288a-f), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled `Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations', signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, or to the families, suites or servants of such officers or employees.

SEC. 7. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ACT.

The joint resolution entitled `A joint resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, and authorizing an appropriation therefor' approved July 30, 1946 (Public Law 79-565, 22 U.S.C. 287m-287t), is repealed.

SEC. 8. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1973.

The United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287 note) is repealed.

SEC. 9. REPEAL OF UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.

The joint resolution entitled `Joint Resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation therefor,' approved June 14, 1948 (22 U.S.C. 290, 290a-e-1) is repealed.

SEC. 10. REPEAL OF INVOLVEMENT IN UNITED NATIONS CONVENTIONS AND AGREEMENTS.

As of the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States will end any and all participation in any and all conventions and agreements with the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations. Any remaining functions of such conventions and agreements shall not be carried out.

SEC. 11. REEMPLOYMENT WITH UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AFTER SERVICE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the rights of employees under subchapter IV of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, relating to reemployment after service with an international organization.

SEC. 12. NOTIFICATION.

Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall notify the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations of the provisions of this Act.

SEC. 13. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Except as otherwise provided, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

 

Flanders

Council Member
SEC. 8. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1973.

The United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287 note) is repealed.​
HR 1146 is looking up:

EXCLUSIVE: The Obama administration can expect a knock-down battle with the next Congress over its announced $3 billion contribution to the United Nations-affiliated Green Climate Fund, a centerpiece of talks over a new treaty on greenhouse gas emissions held in Lima, Peru, last week.

“If they think they are going to get all that money for the fund, they’re mistaken,” a senior aide to Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., told Fox News. “You’re going to see us being more aggressive about not sending more money to the U.N. and elsewhere for climate change.”

Fight looms over $3 billion Obama administration payment to UN-linked climate fund
By George Russell
Published December 15, 2014

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/12/15/fight-looms-over-3-billion-obama-administration-payment-to-un-linked-climate/?intcmp=latestnews
 

Wahbooz

Governor
Wow, another one who thinks it's ok to screw up (read that as fvck up) the world, cause we'll just catch a bus to the next world.

Or is your god going to take you to his summer home? Good luck with either.
 

Flanders

Council Member
Anybody who is paying attention to the two filthy “spiritual leaders” probably knows what they are up to. It will be next year before the head priest writes his encyclical. I want to point out that the filthy Catholic sneak is pulling a swift one in conjunction with the piece of scum in the White House. Here is how it works:

The pope can voluntarily shake the can with Catholics, but by tying environmental fraud to the IRS, and to the EPA, every NON-CATHOLIC American taxpayer will be forced to tithe a lot more than 10 percent to the Catholic church, and to the United Nations.

Pope Francis has even gone as far as to call the destruction of the rainforest a sin, and cautioned Catholics and non-Catholics alike that protecting the environment is a sacred matter, going as far as back as his inaugural mass in 2013.

“The vocation of being a ‘protector,’ however, is not just something involving us Christians alone; it also has a prior dimension which is simply human, involving everyone. It means protecting all creation, the beauty of the created world, as the Book of Genesis tells us and as Saint Francis of Assisi showed us. It means respecting each of God’s creatures and respecting the environment in which we live.”​

And have you noticed that the hustling priest is suddenly popular with Communists:

These views, as well as the pope’s humility and his example of leading a far less lavish lifestyle than previous popes, have made him very popular among non-Catholics as well as members of his own church.

Free Republic
Pope Francis: Environmental Destruction A Sin, Will Write Encyclical On Climate Change
Posted on 12/30/2014, 8:11:40 PM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3242197/post

The beauty is that the two charity hustlers working together will seat hundreds of thousands of environmental parasites at the public trough —— in addition to using American tax dollars to establish a universal welfare state based on the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UN’s human Rights must be paid for by free people until those freedoms are lost forever; so you can be sure that Catholic priests, along with United Nations charity hustlers, will rake in billions forever.

NOTE: Throughout history priests kept mankind in poverty. It was America’s freedoms that gave the world the only, and the best, country with the most liberties including THE HIGHEST STANDARD OF LIVING FOR THE MOST PEOPLE, yet filthy priests are close to convincing fools that eliminating liberty will NOT bring mankind back to poverty which is the only thing priests ever gave to humankind.

Finally, I do not know which of the two hustling environmental priests is the foulest piece of garbage. My call gives the scum in the White House the edge because the one in the Vatican cannot force Americans to do pay through the nose.
 

Wahbooz

Governor
Now this is a real joke.

Ignore The Standard Environmental Lies

Apparently the poster thinks corporations are safely keeping the environment in safetry deposit boxes at J.P.Morgan Chase. Oh no, the rain forests being destroyed is some religious lie and conspiracy for us to pay taxes to the Vatican. Wow, and here I thought they were disappearing because people were cutting them down.

Yup, ignorance prevails, just like here where people see 100 or 200 year old trees as old growth, as if clear cutting of 1000 year old trees never happened. So lets preach the words of Ann Coulter. Yessiree Bob, god gave the earth to man to rape.
 
Repeatedly going over all of the lies coming out of Gina McCarthy's EPA’s is an exercise in futility. She, along with every global warming environmental parasite, only laugh at everybody else. The little freak makes no pretense:


Members of Congress are probably well-aware of every EPA lie cited in a terrific, fact-filled, piece by Stephen Moore and Kathleen Hartnett White; nevertheless, Congress should not waste time on the well-known environmental lies the public has been hearing for decades and zero in on the United Nations.

. . . the overall reductions in the planetary volume of carbon-dioxide emissions would be microscopic — like trying to reduce the rise of the oceans with a syringe. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s own official number crunchers say that we must reduce global carbon-dioxide emissions by 80 percent over the next several decades to avert catastrophic warming. The EPA’s proposed cut would yield an immeasurable 0.018 degree Celsius cooling.​

This is going to save the planet from catastrophe? Good luck.​

Think Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Was Outrageous? Check Out What He’s Doing at the EPA.
Stephen Moore / Kathleen Hartnett White / December 07, 2014

http://dailysignal.com/2014/12/07/think-obamas-executive-action-on-immigration-was-outrageous-check-out-what-hes-doing-at-the-epa/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

The EPA is a de facto United Nations agency. Everything that comes from the EPA originates in the United Nations. With that in mind it might be easier to defund the UN than it is to rein-in the Clean Air Act the way the EPA treats it as though it is untouchable. My reasoning tells me that Democrats will not be too quick to defend the United Nations the way they defend the EPA.

Finally, for years I’ve suggested this is the perfect fighting song to lead the charge against the UN:



I make a distinction between what I perceive to be a political scam -Global Warming and Climate Change and family and any and all destruction, purposeful devastation, poisoning ect - of utter utter carelessness of Mother Earth and her inhabitants. To me the political scam detracts from the real horrors of the greedy evil machine which is killing all that is worthy and beautiful................ even if and when it is ugly :)
 

Flanders

Council Member
I make a distinction between what I perceive to be a political scam -Global Warming and Climate Change and family and any and all destruction, purposeful devastation, poisoning ect - of utter utter carelessness of Mother Earth and her inhabitants. To me the political scam detracts from the real horrors of the greedy evil machine which is killing all that is worthy and beautiful................ even if and when it is ugly :)
To Queen Titania: I cannot separate the differences between environmental parasite scams originating at the Unite Nations, and the constant touchy-feely parasites wailing about concerns for Mother Earth. Handing every freakazoid an environmental religion is the ugly part.

NOTE: Communists flocked to the Environmental Movement after the Soviet Union imploded. Now every hustler in the world like John Kerry, and the pope, preach environment gospel like they got it straight out of God’s mouth. Kerry is lying sack of spit who betrayed his own country:


Kerry: God Commands Me to Protect Muslim Countries from Global Warming (VIDEO)
September 4, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/kerry-god-commands-me-to-protect-muslim-countries-from-global-warming-video/

The pope is nothing more than a priest looking for converts:

Papal text says man betrays God by destroying the environment
By PHILIP PULLELLA and KAREN LEMA, Reuters January 18, 2015 2:54pm

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/popefrancis/story/409276/papal-text-says-man-betrays-god-by-destroying-the-environment
 
To Queen Titania: I cannot separate the differences between environmental parasite scams originating at the Unite Nations, and the constant touchy-feely parasites wailing about concerns for Mother Earth. Handing every freakazoid an environmental religion is the ugly part.

NOTE: Communists flocked to the Environmental Movement after the Soviet Union imploded. Now every hustler in the world like John Kerry, and the pope, preach environment gospel like they got it straight out of God’s mouth. Kerry is lying sack of spit who betrayed his own country:


Kerry: God Commands Me to Protect Muslim Countries from Global Warming (VIDEO)
September 4, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/kerry-god-commands-me-to-protect-muslim-countries-from-global-warming-video/

The pope is nothing more than a priest looking for converts:

Papal text says man betrays God by destroying the environment
By PHILIP PULLELLA and KAREN LEMA, Reuters January 18, 2015 2:54pm

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/popefrancis/story/409276/papal-text-says-man-betrays-god-by-destroying-the-environment

So, you can't do what I do, do? - Try, it isn't so very hard ;-)
 

Flanders

Council Member
I already know ------ I don't bother arguing it any more, I will argue against actual damage and its actual consequences.
To Queen Titania: I assume you are more informed than Al Gore & Company who refuse to defend designer-science against anyone! Hell, you might even win a Nobel Peace Prize if you can convince anybody that a consensus is real science.
 
To Titania: Stop the double-talk. I'm getting off:

That is not double talk -------------- if a big pharma company finds a cure for any disease they make plenty dosh out of, are they going to pass it on to their 'bread and butter' NO they are not- they might use some of this new found knowledge but not all of it ---------- thus,it is not what you know,it is what you do with that knowledge -----of Politicians! Are they more dangerous when stupid or when clever? Huh that'll stump ya!
 

Flanders

Council Member
Jefferson's Wall of Separation Letter

http://www.usconstitution.net/jeffwall.html

The Chicago gutter-bum preacher and his little maggot have no use for the doctrine of Separation of Church and State:

EPA administrator Gina McCarthy visited the Vatican recently to discuss climate change EPA officials said “McCarthy used the meeting to applaud the pope’s efforts to fight climate change, and to brief the Vatican on Obama’s plan for cutting greenhouse gas emissions that are driving global warming.”​

I have two observations to add about authority:

Voltaire enshrined the inherent dangers in dealing with authority with his observation: “It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong.”

XXXXX

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can be viewed as a modern-day stand-in for the Roman Inquisition on all topics environmental.

XXXXX

The vigor with which both the Church and the EPA have linked their common belief and dogmatic position that mankind is the prime driver of climate change should concern those staunch defenders of the doctrine of “separation of church and state.” Challengers to either authority ought have Voltaire’s admonition in mind.​

1. The EPA’s authority originates with the United Nations.

2. The combined power of the United Nations and the Roman Catholic Church do not YET have the authority to slaughter environmental heretics. Never forget that Jesuits were always the goon squad for the R.C.Ch.


However, truth will out, and Galileo subsequently managed to offend formerly supportive Pope Urban VIII, a Jesuit, and members of the Jesuit Order, . . .

XXXXX

The parallels to Pope Francis’ expressed ideas on environment and climate change are notable. The Pope is also a Jesuit.

February 2, 2015
No Separation between Church and State on Climate Change
By Charles Battig

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/02/no_separation_between_church_and_state_on_climate_change.html
 

Wahbooz

Governor
It is interesting to note that 'separation of church and state' is only acceptable when it benefits the particular political interests of those who invoke it. Here' talking to a 'head of state', i.e. the Pope, is a violation of 'separation of church and state'.

But bear in mind, there is absolutely nothing wrong with bringing a 'head of state', such as Benjamin Netanyahu, and giving him a voice, in our political system, in opposition to the president of the country.
 

Flanders

Council Member
It is interesting to note that 'separation of church and state' is only acceptable when it benefits the particular political interests of those who invoke it.
To Wahbooz: Every politician does it looking for votes from acolytes from this or that religion. Holding the line on the First Amendment, which is the foundation for a separation of church and state, used to work fairly well —— until presidents began to behave like morality guidance counselors. Not a one of them ever explained ‘My morality and not yours.’

Bottom line: Government and organized religion will always plague mankind. Give either one too much power and freedom dies. The trick is to limit government while keeping organized religion voluntary. Give either one too much power and freedom dies.


Here' talking to a 'head of state', i.e. the Pope, is a violation of 'separation of church and state'.
To Wahbooz: Vatican City is a theocracy. In short: The pope is also the head of a government. The danger is in American officials consulting a theocrat on US policy.

But bear in mind, there is absolutely nothing wrong with bringing a 'head of state', such as Benjamin Netanyahu, and giving him a voice, in our political system, in opposition to the president of the country.
To Wahbooz: There is nothing wrong when a head of a foreign government pays a state visit. They do it all of the time. There is everything wrong with heads of national governments having a voice in our political system. Basically, every decision must always be based on what is best for America.

Incidentally, Netanyahu’s visit to Congress happens to be on the side of the angels so he can make his case for Israel irrespective of the smokescreen the Administration is laying down about protocol. The whole thing is nothing more than a media tempest in a teacup.
 
Last edited:
Top