First let me say that irrespective of far too many incompetent doctors running around, I have tremendous respect for those compassionate doctors who do so much good treating pain and suffering. Not so with doctors specializing in treating cancer. Somewhere along the way doctors treating cancer abandoned the golden rule of medicine: FIRST DO NO HARM. The public would not tolerate any other branch of medicine allowed to do so much harm.
No oncologist can prove that a cancer sufferer survived because they agreed to take a cancer treatment like chemotherapy. Conversely, there is no proof that a patient cancer was killed by the cancer cure. That’s why they take the best of both sides.
If healthcare was a gambling casino cancer would be the houses’s most lucrative table in the joint. My instinct tells me that the medical industry, and the courts, bend over backwards to protect so much charity money, and tax dollar money, in “cancer treatment.” In fact, cancer treatments are nothing more than medical experiments.
NOTE: Democrats importing diseases is an extension of medical industry experiments that began with the same as experimenting on trusting guinea pigs.
Incidentally, many doctors often lie about chemotherapy. Often, they never warn patients that chemotherapy follows cancer surgery. In other words many patients would forego the surgery if they knew that chemotherapy was part of it.
To be honest, I would not want to make the call for somebody else with cancer:
Dr. Richard Smith seems to be saying that there is no cure for cancer. I am not knowledgeable enough to accept his view, but if he is true it means that a whole lot of greedy cynics are after the big money in treating symptoms instead of actually searching for an impossible cure.
There is one thing that I do know. No butcher in America’s Culture of Death should have this authority:
Finally, I always thought that a judge should be charged with murder when a minor dies from court-ordered chemotherapy. Nobody knows how many such deaths occurred because they were ordered by the courts. There is at least one record of Billy Best who survived because he fled from a court-ordered chemotherapy:
No oncologist can prove that a cancer sufferer survived because they agreed to take a cancer treatment like chemotherapy. Conversely, there is no proof that a patient cancer was killed by the cancer cure. That’s why they take the best of both sides.
If healthcare was a gambling casino cancer would be the houses’s most lucrative table in the joint. My instinct tells me that the medical industry, and the courts, bend over backwards to protect so much charity money, and tax dollar money, in “cancer treatment.” In fact, cancer treatments are nothing more than medical experiments.
NOTE: Democrats importing diseases is an extension of medical industry experiments that began with the same as experimenting on trusting guinea pigs.
Incidentally, many doctors often lie about chemotherapy. Often, they never warn patients that chemotherapy follows cancer surgery. In other words many patients would forego the surgery if they knew that chemotherapy was part of it.
To be honest, I would not want to make the call for somebody else with cancer:
A former editor of the British Medical Journal has claimed that we should ‘stop wasting billions trying to cure cancer’ – because it is the best way to die.
‘This is, I recognise, a romantic view of dying, but it is achievable with love, morphine, and whisky. But stay away from overambitious oncologists, and let’s stop wasting billions trying to cure cancer, potentially leaving us to die a much more horrible death.’
XXXXX
‘This is, I recognise, a romantic view of dying, but it is achievable with love, morphine, and whisky. But stay away from overambitious oncologists, and let’s stop wasting billions trying to cure cancer, potentially leaving us to die a much more horrible death.’
Stop wasting billions trying to cure cancer... It's the best way to die, says top doctor
By Jenny Hope Medical Correspondent For The Daily Mail
Published: 05:27 EST, 1 January 2015 | Updated: 06:06 EST, 2 January 2015
By Jenny Hope Medical Correspondent For The Daily Mail
Published: 05:27 EST, 1 January 2015 | Updated: 06:06 EST, 2 January 2015
Dr. Richard Smith seems to be saying that there is no cure for cancer. I am not knowledgeable enough to accept his view, but if he is true it means that a whole lot of greedy cynics are after the big money in treating symptoms instead of actually searching for an impossible cure.
There is one thing that I do know. No butcher in America’s Culture of Death should have this authority:
Connecticut Supreme Court Rules State Can Force Chemotherapy On Teen; Upholds DCF's Custody
By Josh Kovner
January 8, 2015, 4:50 PM
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-teen-battles-chemo-order-0103-20150102-story.html#page=1
By Josh Kovner
January 8, 2015, 4:50 PM
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-teen-battles-chemo-order-0103-20150102-story.html#page=1
Finally, I always thought that a judge should be charged with murder when a minor dies from court-ordered chemotherapy. Nobody knows how many such deaths occurred because they were ordered by the courts. There is at least one record of Billy Best who survived because he fled from a court-ordered chemotherapy:
Billy Best ran away from home in Norwell, Mass., in 1994 to avoid chemotherapy, and today he offered conflicting words of support and opposition to Daniel and Colleen Hauser. The mother and son, who are from Minnesota, are now part of an international police search after they fled a judge's court-ordered chemotherapy Monday for Daniel.
Man Who Survived Without Chemo: 'I'd Still Fight'
May 23, 2009
By LAUREN COX, EMILY FRIEDMAN and JASON RYAN
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7661834
May 23, 2009
By LAUREN COX, EMILY FRIEDMAN and JASON RYAN
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7661834
Last edited:
