New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

A Pair Of Angels From Hell

Flanders

Council Member
The media will spread Democrat-Republican horse manure from now until November 2016. To nobody’s surprise Hillary Clinton will get all of the help she needs from the media. Should Hillary Clinton get her party’s nomination she does stand the best chance of making tax dollar abortion (Planned Parenthood) a major issue in the general election. Here is why I hope she gets the nomination:


Hillary Clinton’s imitation of a vicious woman, Margaret Sanger, was never a secret, but very few Americans realize that Hillary Clinton believes that Saul Alinsky is superior to Thomas Jefferson:

In April 2009, Congressman Jeff Fortenberry dialogued with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on foreign policy At 4 minutes 25 seconds into this video, Hillary Clinton compares the eugenics advocate and racist Margaret Sanger to Thomas Jefferson. Clinton even seems to say that Sanger is superior to Jefferson.​


The media will cover up Hillary Clinton’s brutality not so much for her reputation but for this alone:

In her role as Secretary of State Clinton pressed for abortion on an international scale. As recently as June 2012, she was upset the document the United Nations adopted at its Rio+20 conference did not promote abortion by inserting terms like “reproductive rights” into he language of the text.​

Hillary Clinton: I Admire Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 9/23/14 6:02 PM

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/09/23/hillary-clinton-i-admire-planned-parenthood-founder-margaret-sanger/

It never ceases to astound me that so many “ loyal Americans” embrace Saul Alinsky while they despise America’s Founding Fathers —— most especially Thomas Jefferson. I can understand Democrats working to establish a Communist theocracy in order to replace the Constitution, but it is difficult to understand why America-hating Democrats/liberals have been sleeping with this bunch:

It was the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) that unleashed the evil Saul Alinsky on an unsuspecting Western society, from Chicago. Satan-loving Alinsky, whose ideals motivate both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to this day, was going nowhere until the USCCB took him under their robes and financed him.​

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops financially supporting anti-cop protests
By Judi McLeod January 6, 2015

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/68768

Finally, if Margaret Sanger (1883 - 1966) is the “Killer Angel” what should Hillary Clinton be called because of the historical facts in this article?:

The architect of the greatest genocide in history
Posted By Michael Brown On 01/07/2015 @ 7:23 pm

When Harvard University Press published “The Black Book of Communism” in 1999, many readers were astonished to learn that communism had resulted in the deaths of at least 100 million people, an absolutely staggering number. But even that number pales in comparison to the number of babies killed by abortion since 1920 – more than 1 billion.

According to LifesiteNews.com, Thomas Jacobson of the Global Life Campaign “stated that he has very carefully tracked all actual reported numbers of international abortions from 1920 forward and found that the total has exceeded 1 billion since that time. That, he emphasizes, ‘makes abortion the greatest genocide in history’” – 10 times greater than communism with all its deadly effects.

And the greatest proponent of abortion in history is none other than Margaret Sanger, dubbed the “Killer Angel” in George Grant’s short biographical study of the founder of Planned Parenthood.

That’s why Grant begins his book by talking about the destructive legacies of Josef Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger, noting, “As the founder of Planned Parenthood and the impassioned heroine of various feminist causes célèbre, Sanger was responsible for the brutal elimination of more than 30 million children in the United States and as many as 2 and a half billion worldwide.” (Note that Grant’s figures are more than double those of Jacobson.)

Make no mistake about it: Sanger was a radical in every (bad) sense of the word, imbibing the most destructive causes of her day.

Her passion for abortion was anything but a compassionate burden for poor and underprivileged mothers.

Quite the contrary.

It was a way to stop the world from overpopulating by weeding out the most unwanted sectors of society, which is why, to this day, abortion clinics are especially plentiful in the poorer neighborhoods.

As for her radicalness, in the first edition of her 8-sheet publication called “The Woman Rebel,” “she denounced marriage as ‘a degenerate institution,’ capitalism as ‘indecent exploitation,’ and sexual modesty as ‘obscene prudery.’” (“Killer Angel,” 32)

Her publication crossed so many lines that she had to flee America for fear of impending arrest.

This is the illustrious founder of Planned Parenthood.

This is why there is so much innocent blood on their hands.

Only an organization like Planned Parenthood could put out an upbeat, celebratory annual report detailing how many hundreds of thousands of babies it had terminated in the previous 12 months.

And only an organization like Planned Parenthood could announce the report with these words: “Safe, Smart, Connected, Strong, Global – that’s Generation Healthy.”

Generation Healthy? This is not far in spirit from what I referred to last year as “Planned Parenthood’s Pastoral Letter from Hell.”

Sanger was greatly influenced by Thomas Malthus (1766-1834), a cleric and professor who believed that “population grows exponentially over time, while production only grows arithmetically” (“Killer Angel,” 34-35).

That means that something intentional must be done to reduce population growth, otherwise there would ultimately be massive famine and agonizing death for much of the world’s population. And so he counseled that, “Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits,” with the hope that the poor would be wiped out by disease and plague. And he wanted to restrain those “benevolent, but much mistaken men” who thought they were helping the human race by trying to eradicate disease and plague. (See his magnum opus, “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” cited in “Killer Angel,” 35-36.)

Sanger was enthralled by the work of Malthus, writing, “My criticism, therefore is not directed at the failure of philanthropy, but rather at its success. These dangers inherent in the very idea of humanitarianism and altruism, dangers which have today produced their full harvest of human waste” (cited in “Killer Angel,” 47).

Ultimately, she found a better way to get rid of this “human waste,” whom she called “defectives, delinquents, and dependents,” and that way was abortion. (She also advocated strongly for promiscuous sex with birth control.)

That’s why, after initially targeting neighborhoods filled with “dysgenic immigrant Southern Europeans, Slavs, Latins, and Jews,” she developed the “Negro Project,” since, she explained, “The mass of Negroes, particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among Whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit” (cited in “Killer Angel,” 52).

Yes, as she infamously wrote, people like this were nothing more than “human weeds.”

And in words that defy description, she proposed, “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” (I appeal to every one of my African-American friends to get these quotes out as widely as possible. And I urge every reader to challenge Planned Parenthood with these quotes. You can do so politely, since the quotes are damning enough.)

There is no nice face to put on Planned Parenthood or Margaret Sanger.

They are collaborators in the greatest genocide in human history, and we can only continue to pray and work against their deadly designs and give ourselves to the cause of life.

The good news is that abortion clinics in America continue to shut down, with the smallest number of clinics open in more than two decades.

May we live to see the last of them closed.

May we live to see every human life esteemed.

May we live to see Margaret Sanger’s murderous ideology completely exposed, totally renounced and absolutely rejected.​

 
Last edited:

Flanders

Council Member
Paul Kengor’s brief powerful history of Margaret Sanger's romance with the KKK is a MUST-READ for anyone who is interested in denying Planned Parenthood’s tax dollar funding.

One paragraph discredits Democrats looking for tax dollars to pay for abortions whenever they claim abortion is about a woman’s choice. Those same Democrats look for voters whenever they claim Planned Parenthood is in the business of women’s health.

The following paragraph is, and always has been, the primary business of Sanger’s Planned Parenthood:


Today, Planned Parenthood is the single leading killer of unborn African-American babies, whose lives it snuffs out at a percentage far higher than white babies. That’s the real racial legacy of Margaret Sanger. On January 22, 1973, Roe v. Wade would give her Planned Parenthood its mandate, and liberals would sanctify its work with taxpayer funding.​

Incidentally, I am sorry I did not title this thread Three Angels From Hell. You have to know that Typhoid Nancy wants to kill black babies no less than did Margaret Sanger:

But liberals can get away with this stuff. Worse, they can flip it on its head. Amazingly, they viciously denounce not those who support Planned Parenthood but those who don’t. Remember the debate in 2011? When Republicans sought to cut federal funding of Planned Parenthood, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Republicans had placed a “bull’s eye on women in America.” Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA) asserted, “This is a war on women.” Senator Dianne Feinstein insisted that defunding efforts were “nothing more than an opportunity for the right wing in the House to sock it to women.” Senator Barbara Boxer described Republican efforts as a “vendetta” against women. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it a “very dangerous situation for… women across our country.” Pelosi told reporters: “It’s degrading to women; it’s disrespectful.” She said Republicans were using Planned Parenthood as a “whipping boy.”

How ironic that Nancy Pelosi would use Planned Parenthood and “whipping boy” in the same sentence. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger spoke to the KKK’s whipping boys—or at least the whipping boys’ wives.​

The truth is that Margaret Sanger is an icon to Pelosi for this reason:

Sanger was a passionate racial-eugenicist with a crowning vision for what she openly called “race improvement.” The Planned Parenthood founder lamented America’s “race of degenerates.” The nation’s landscape needed to be purged of its “human weeds” and “the dead weight of human waste.” This included the “feeble-minded,” the “insane,” and the just plain “idiots.” Sanger shared the disparaging view of humanity held by another progressive icon, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who declared that “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Like Holmes, and, for that matter, like Adolf Hitler—who was an obviously more aggressive racial-eugenicist—Sanger hoped to finesse and refine the “gene pool.” She would do so not with gas chambers and concentration camps but with birth-control pills, eliminating human life before conception rather than after birth. Thus, her Planned Parenthood, which was originally called the American Birth Control League.

Reflections on Roe: When Margaret Sanger Spoke to the KKK
Someone owes Steve Scalise a huge apology.
By Paul Kengor – 1.22.15

http://spectator.org/articles/61552/reflections-roe-when-margaret-sanger-spoke-kkk

Margaret Sanger did not consider Negroes to be human beings. Nobody can convince me that any woman who idolizes Sanger would save black babies who survive longer than 20 weeks. In the interest of fairness perhaps Typhoid Nancy will state her position:

Pelosi Won't Say if Unborn Baby at 20 Weeks is a 'Human Being'
January 22, 2015 - 11:27 AM
By Lauretta Brown

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/lauretta-brown/pelosi-wont-say-if-unborn-baby-20-weeks-human-being
 

Flanders

Council Member
Hillary Clinton’s heroine, Margaret Sanger, is the cruelest choice of all:



“We at Women on 20s applaud President Obama for acknowledging that it’s time to put a woman’s face on our paper currency,” the group says on its website.

The group also let it be known it is pulling for the more radical “disrupters” on the list. Two former black slaves who went on to achieve greatness – Tubman and Truth – were also included, perhaps to compensate for the choice of Sanger.​

In addition to Sanger, the other ladies made the list for a specific political agenda not the country as a whole. Every one of them would be a mockery on a postage stamp let alone on currency, but none more than Rachel Carson?

Betty Friedan?
Rosa Parks?
Shirley Chisholm?
Barbara Jordan?
Rachel Carson?
Susan B. Anthony?
Eleanor Roosevelt?
Patsy Mink?
Frances Perkins?
Sojourner Truth?
Alice Paul?
Elizabeth Cady Stanton?
Margaret Sanger?
Clara Barton?
Harriet Tubman?

Infamous woman to replace Jackson on $20 bill?
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 03/24/2015 @ 7:44 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/will-this-woman-replace-jackson-on-20-bill/
 

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
Hillary Clinton’s heroine, Margaret Sanger, is the cruelest choice of all:



“We at Women on 20s applaud President Obama for acknowledging that it’s time to put a woman’s face on our paper currency,” the group says on its website.

The group also let it be known it is pulling for the more radical “disrupters” on the list. Two former black slaves who went on to achieve greatness – Tubman and Truth – were also included, perhaps to compensate for the choice of Sanger.​

In addition to Sanger, the other ladies made the list for a specific political agenda not the country as a whole. Every one of them would be a mockery on a postage stamp let alone on currency, but none more than Rachel Carson?

Betty Friedan?
Rosa Parks?
Shirley Chisholm?
Barbara Jordan?
Rachel Carson?
Susan B. Anthony?
Eleanor Roosevelt?
Patsy Mink?
Frances Perkins?
Sojourner Truth?
Alice Paul?
Elizabeth Cady Stanton?
Margaret Sanger?
Clara Barton?
Harriet Tubman?

Infamous woman to replace Jackson on $20 bill?
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 03/24/2015 @ 7:44 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/will-this-woman-replace-jackson-on-20-bill/
I see you are not a numismatist...









 

Flanders

Council Member
I see you are not a numismatist...
To Craig: I am neither:

numismatics (noun)

(used with a sing. verb) Abbr. numis. The study or collection of money, coins, and often medals.

numismatist (noun)

XXXXX

philately (noun)

The collection and study of postage stamps, postmarks, and related materials; stamp collecting.

philatelic ( or philatelical) (adjective)
philatelically (adverb)
philatelist (noun)​
 

fairsheet

Senator
As I always say....if it takes ya two separate posts to fit in all your fears and hatreds, you should maybe consider a little editing.
 

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
To Craig: I am neither:

numismatics (noun)

(used with a sing. verb) Abbr. numis. The study or collection of money, coins, and often medals.

numismatist (noun)

XXXXX

philately (noun)

The collection and study of postage stamps, postmarks, and related materials; stamp collecting.

philatelic ( or philatelical) (adjective)
philatelically (adverb)
philatelist (noun)​
Yes, philatelist. Better.

Yes...it was obvious you were not either, as the list of women you find should not even grace a postage stamp, do.
 

Flanders

Council Member
I thought Kermit Gosnell’s income was the epitome of liberalism’s depravity. I was wrong. The enclosed undercover video exposes yet another Planned Parenthood practice that picks up where Gosnell leaves off. My fear is that the latest atrocity will be buried by media ghouls who benefit from blood and death (advertising dollars and ratings). Protecting Democrats, and defending Planned Parenthood, with the usual justifications for murdering babies in the womb —— a woman’s health, and a woman’s right to chose —— stand a good chance of the media burying the ghoulish aspects of selling baby body parts. Let’s face the truth on this one, the media and Planned Parenthood are in the business of making money. Burying a brutal story flies in the face of the media’s business model: If it bleeds, it ledes.


Why Hillary Clinton? Answer: Selling baby body parts will most certainly become a worldwide lucrative business for Planned Parenthood:

The media will cover up Hillary Clinton’s brutality not so much for her reputation but for this alone:

In her role as Secretary of State Clinton pressed for abortion on an international scale. As recently as June 2012, she was upset the document the United Nations adopted at its Rio+20 conference did not promote abortion by inserting terms like “reproductive rights” into he language of the text.
I doubt if our friends in the media will press Clinton on her love of Margaret Sanger, or her financial arrangement with Planned Parenthood:

. . . Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton likely won’t be sounding off any time soon.

She and President Obama are among the top recipients of Planned Parenthood contributions, according to InfluenceExplorer.com.

When Clinton announced her candidacy, Planned Parenthood gave her a warm welcome and a ringing endorsement:

“Hillary Clinton is a strong and steadfast advocate for women’s health and rights,” Planned Parenthood Action Fund President Cecile Richards said in a statement. “In our nation’s history, there has not been a candidate for president with a stronger commitment to women or a clearer record on behalf of women’s health and rights. … Hillary Clinton’s record and commitment is in stark contrast to the GOP presidential contenders so far who have records of trying to restrict access to safe and legal abortion, affordable birth control, and women’s health care providers like Planned Parenthood.”

The Clinton campaign had not returned a WND request for comment at the time of this report.

Mutilated babies storm into presidential race
Posted By Garth Kant On 07/14/2015 @ 6:02 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/huckabee-selling-unborn-body-parts-grotesque/

 
Top