If "we" are all sinners then "we" have a responsibility to sin no more. There's no responsibility to ensure others don't sin. That's not our purview. It's theirs and their relationship with God. How dare you or others presume to decide what someone else's discussion with God has been? If you think taking pictures of someone who is a sinner is a sin, then you should not take pictures of anyone, right? Because we all are sinners. It's gross hypocrisy to stand against sinners you can "see" since you know that all are sinners. And their sin is not yours to judge. You don't always know when people are doing what "God forbids" but you feel yourself free to pick and choose. It's not your call.
No one is "being unable to participate in a wedding between same gender partners" because no one is "being told to" participate in the wedding. Don't go to the wedding. If you share the same sidewalk, is that a sin? If your tax dollars go to their social security is that a sin? If a firefighter that you paid tax dollars to saves their life, do you own that sin?
And yes, "being unable to participate in a wedding between same gender partners," when it means that people cannot avail themselves of the same business that other people can is exactly tantamount to discrimination.
The couple with the cake "still not married." WTF? Do you have a point with that? Did you just win something? Hey, that hetero couple who got married in your church 25 years ago? They're divorced. Do I win a prize?
My point about the couple still not being married is that they were a set up. They said they had heard that this baker had in the past refused to do the exact thing they went in asked him for, despite what they knew. How long has it been? They're still not married. Who orders their wedding cake when they haven't even set a date yet?
As for the rest of your post, you're just saying the same thing with different words. But the bottom line is,,,,,you are arguing against a faith you don't understand in the least.
These refusals aren't about "judging others" or claiming to know what their "discussions with God have been". These refusals are about the individual business owner trying to be faithful to THEIR OWN discussions with God and trying to behave in the way they believe GOD wants THEM to behave.
Again, you refuse to address the real issue and instead try and turn the discussion against Christianity. And of course it's a Christianity that you're fabricating.
I know of no Christianity that would have followers opposing saving the lives of anyone. If you do, then you need to take your outrage over that with THEM. But I think you just made that up. I also think you could not ever prove that the people who couldn't provide for these weddings believe such a thing.