Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Tripling The Prison Population

F

Flanders

Council Member
Jerome Corsi’s piece on the Clinton Foundation is a must-read full of facts if you are following the story.

I do not know your knowledge of legalese, but ‘private inurement’ was a new term for me. I fell in love with it as soon as I learned what it means:

Ortel believes that once his findings have been studied, state and local law enforcement authorities will initiate multiple criminal investigations and charge the Clintons with “private inurement,” the crime of enriching themselves through a nonprofit organization.

He explained that the burden of proof, under state and federal laws, will be on the Clintons to demonstrate that their foundation was not operated as a systematic fraud designed to enrich themselves and their associates.​

Without exaggerating, I can say the prison population will triple if every charity hustler does time for private inurement:

“The question is no longer whether Hillary Clinton can win the Democratic primaries for president,” Fitton told WND. “The question now is whether Bill and Hillary Clinton can stay out of jail.”

Wall Street analyst: 'Shut down Clinton Foundation'
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 05/11/2015 @ 8:02 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/wall-street-analyst-shut-down-clinton-foundation/​

My question: How many charity hustlers ever did a day in jail for private inurement?

I do know that United Nations charity hustlers engaging in a bit of private inurement are protected by diplomatic immunity. From what I’ve been learning about the Clinton Foundation it did some business through the United Nations. Admittedly, the connection is shadowy:

Former US President Clinton appointed UN special envoy for Haiti

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=30843#.VVHIekLD9V8​

You can wager that Clinton’s special envoy title will give him more than enough cover. The State Department, the Justice Department, the Congress, and the entire machinery of the federal government provide former senator, and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton more cover than the Devil has in Hell.

Incidentally, spouses are not compelled to testify against one another. Not so with Chelsea. Her name is on the Clinton Foundation. Looking at this picture, I got the feeling that Bill is telling Hillary “Let’s Give Them Her.”


Hillary, Chelsea, and Bill Clinton​

Even with all of the cover protecting the Clintons they felt compelled to send out Lanny Davis with a line of horseshit that fools no one. Listening to Davis you get the impression the Clintons did not establish their foundation for the sole purpose of private inurement:


Crooks who do business with a gun do not lay down a legal defense before they commit a crime. People like the Clintons know exactly what they can steal before they commit a crime, and exactly how to do it. In addition to the criminal expertise of two lawyers the Clintons consult with experts to cover every contingency. By the time they set the foundation in motion, God forbid anyone dare accuse them of not knowing how to beat the rap before they got started.

Finally, I wonder if all of those donors to the Clinton Foundation who took a charitable tax donation are guilty of private inurement, or is it simple tax fraud? Donors sure as hell do not have the cover the Clintons enjoy.
 
fairsheet

fairsheet

Senator
The utterly pathetic Corsi aside, this does raise us a very interesting conundrum. Why is it that we seem to have at least some level of acceptance for people who profit from "neutral" causes (say, manufacturing bobble-heads), but we're taken aback when people profit from "good" causes (say, feeding the children)?
 
F

Flanders

Council Member
fairsheet said:
Why is it that we seem to have at least some level of acceptance for people who profit from "neutral" causes (say, manufacturing bobble-heads), but we're taken aback when people profit from "good" causes (say, feeding the children)?
Click to expand...
To fairsheet: First let me remind you that:

Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial "we." Mark Twain ​

In plain English, I am not one of your we.

No one is forced to buy bobble-heads. Coerced charity offends everybody except charity hustlers and parasites. Private charity donors taking a tax deduction is bad enough. Dirty little moralist freaks in government using tax dollars to fund their morality is worse. Both use tax dollars that individuals may not agree with. I certainly do not agree with anything hustlers like the Clintons do; most especially their phoney compassion.

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fund-raising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons are on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the Foundation.

In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’
By Isabel Vincent
April 26, 2015 | 7:47am

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/​

Over the years, I’ve talked about coerced charity every way from Sunday. The Clinton Foundation gives me an opportunity to revisit one aspect of every institutional charity that needs as much exposure it can get.

QUESTION?

WHEN WILL MEDIA OUTLETS POINT OUT THAT EVERY DOLLAR DONATED TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION COMES RIGHT OUT OF THE POCKETS OF WORKING AMERICANS.

It did not begin with the Clintons, nor will it end with them because coerced charity is the economy —— charity by force has become too big to fail. Every dollar EVERY charity takes in is a deductible INCOME TAX DOLLAR for somebody. In addition to foreign aid paid by income tax dollars, EVERY charity dollar sent abroad directly is a tax deduction for somebody. Here is one notable example:

The $40 million academy aims to give 152 girls from deprived backgrounds a quality education in a country where schools are struggling to overcome the legacy of apartheid.

Oprah Winfrey opens school for girls in South Africa
Updated 1/2/2007 12:58 PM ET

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-01-02-winfrey-school_x.htm​

I would be the first to applaud Winfrey if the $40 million came out of her pocket. Unfortunately, being forced to pay for Winfrey’s generosity through her tax deductions is offensive bordering on slavery. Ditto every form of income tax morality the parasite class loves so dearly.

Parenthetically, liberty takes many forms. As I see it the lyrics in Giuseppe Verdi’s tribute to liberty stands alone as a cry for liberty from coerced charity. Sing along, but only if you know what you are singing for:


When you sing I'm singing with you liberty
When you cry I cry with you in sorrow
When you suffer I'm praying for you liberty
For your struggles will bring us a new tomorrow

Days of sad darkness and fear must one day crumble
For the force of your kindness and love make them tremble
When you sing I'm singing with you liberty
In the void of your absence I keep searching for you

Who are you dream illusion or just reality
Faith ideal desire revolution
I believe you're the symbol of our humanity
Lighting up the world for eternity

I can see why men die to defend you
Try to guard to protect and attend you
When you sing I'm singing with you liberty
With your tears or your joys I love you
Let us sing and rejoice make our own history
Songs of hope with one voice guide us to victory
Liberty, liberty​
 
Fast Eddy

Fast Eddy

Mayor
Every thing you check into stinks with the Clinton's. There will be an investigation, they will be guilty, but what the hell do you do with an old president first lady. Shut them down and take their money I guess. Maybe Hilary will learn what being broke really feels like.
 
fairsheet

fairsheet

Senator
Fast Eddy said:
Every thing you check into stinks with the Clinton's. There will be an investigation, they will be guilty, but what the hell do you do with an old president first lady. Shut them down and take their money I guess. Maybe Hilary will learn what being broke really feels like.
Click to expand...
Given the $70 million Whitewater pogroms, we should be reasonably certain that the Clintons are guilty as charged. After all, after that outrageous public investment they WERE found...........ah, innocent of all charges.
 
fairsheet

fairsheet

Senator
Fast Eddy said:
No I think the Clinton's dodged a bullet on whitewater.
Click to expand...
You HAVE to feel that. For if you didn't, you'd not only have to take at least a smidgen of responsibility for the $70 Million that went down a rat hole after Whitewater's what...a coupla hundred thousand? You'd also have to acknowledge a pretty big hole in your "the Clinton's are dishonest" shriek meme.

Repeat this over and over....it's ALL about the allegations...not the reality. Just keep them allegations flooding in!! Whoever shits out the most accusations, wins!
 
Fast Eddy

Fast Eddy

Mayor
fairsheet said:
You HAVE to feel that. For if you didn't, you'd not only have to take at least a smidgen of responsibility for the $70 Million that went down a rat hole after Whitewater's what...a coupla hundred thousand? You'd also have to acknowledge a pretty big hole in your "the Clinton's are dishonest" shriek meme.

Repeat this over and over....it's ALL about the allegations...not the reality. Just keep them allegations flooding in!! Whoever shits out the most accusations, wins!
Click to expand...
The Clintons are crooked as hell, they are just slimy enough to always slither away. Their trail of wrong doing says it all. When there is that much smoke there is a raging fire underneath.
 
F

Flanders

Council Member
UPDATE

I was joking when I said:

Flanders said:
Incidentally, spouses are not compelled to testify against one another. Not so with Chelsea. Her name is on the Clinton Foundation. Looking at this picture, I got the feeling that Bill is telling Hillary “Let’s Give Them Her.”


Hillary, Chelsea, and Bill Clinton​
Click to expand...
Maybe it is not a joke. I may have stumbled on a serious possibility. The global government crowd has so much time and money invested in President Hillary Clinton and UN Secretary General saving the world together they may have to blame Chelsea for everything.

NEW YORK – The Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation’s explanation for why it was divided into three, legally separate tax-exempt organizations is “misleading and false,” according to a Wall Street analyst who has conducted an in-depth investigation.​

NOTE: Top UN officials had to be sharing the swag with the Clintons:

In his first report, Ortel found what he characterizes as an elaborate system devised by the Clintons to enrich themselves through schemes such as skimming tens of millions of dollars from U.N. levies imposed on airline travelers.​

Skimming from the United Nations is not the same as a one-time stickup. Money changing hands has to occur repeatedly over a long period of time.

Indeed, to assume that United Nations’ charity hustlers are stupid is absurd. They have been in the game too long to fall for the line of crap the “caring” Clintons lay down. You might just as well say that skimming from a Mafia-owned casino without the professionals knowing about it is as easy as shoplifting. The only other possibility makes the Clintons so clever they were looting the treasury right under the noses of UN crooks.

And here comes recently departed Marble Mouth:

Clinton Library fund morphs to combating AIDS

There is no record that any of these changing mission statements, other than the original mission statement to create and fund a Clinton presidential library, was ever completely explained to the IRS or ever formally filed under IRS guidelines for reporting changes, including changing the name of the tax-exempt organization.

XXXXX​

Put simply, Ortel questioned how it is that a foundation granted federal tax-exempt status by the IRS for creating a presidential library in Little Rock, Arkansas, should suddenly come to have federal tax-exempt authorization for combating HIV/AIDS in numerous foreign nations?

XXXXX​

Ortel traced the origin of the idea to create CHAI to a conversation Bill Clinton had with Nelson Mandela that Clinton relates starting on page 179 of his 2007 bestselling book “Giving: How Each of Us Can Change the World.”

There, Clinton wrote: “After Nelson Mandela and I closed the World AIDS conference in Barcelona in [July] 2002, Prime Minister Denzil Douglas of St. Kitts and Nevis asked me to help the Caribbean nations establish and fund systems for the prevention, care, and treatment of HIV/AIDS.

What is the Clinton Foundation NOT doing?
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 05/12/2015 @ 8:42 pm

http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/clinton-foundation-made-shifty-split-when-hillary-joined-obama/​

Sad to say, everybody involved in the Clinton Foundation is too big to get caught.
 
Queen Titania

Queen Titania

Senator
The is no question that these are are truly despicable people anyone who denies it is delusional --- the question is IF she is made Prez, what is it the the American would be voting for? She can't make it without your agreement and so an acceptance of 'the despicable'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top