New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Obama's WH Downplays Ramadi fall as SETBACK.....what a MORON!

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Once again tripped up by your unfamiliarity with the English language...

I can't even say that I'm frustrated at having to correct you and your anti-Obama bullshit....

Read it again Jack. See if it says I am or am not frustrated.
I saw it and I knew you were lying. You are obviously frustrated that everyone doesn't believe the weird shit you believe.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You're lying.

The administration forced the Iraqis into a corner where they would have had to publicly support a new SOFA before they were ready. The Administration new this, they new the Iraqis would reject and they would get the out they needed because it's HARD TO RUN ON ENDING THE IRAQ WAR WHEN YOU STILL HAVE 20K GUYS SITTING IN COUNTRY.
Hard to keep 20k American troops in Iraq when the Iraqi Prime Minisiter and congress don't want them there.
 

MrMike

Bless you all
It would be helpful if Obama (and Moochelle) would go community organize in the region. Perhaps they could bring Hillary and a stack of Videos (Mohammed related) along for the ride?
 

Saladin2

Senator
Supporting Member
It would be helpful if Obama (and Moochelle) would go community organize in the region. Perhaps they could bring Hillary and a stack of Videos (Mohammed related) along for the ride?
It would be helpful if you shut the Fvck up and quit babbling
 

EatTheRich

President
For a whole host of reasons extending even, to our "ally" Turkey, overtly allying ourselves with the Kurds is "troublesome". I'm alright with it by the way, but I imagine we're already stretching that line about as far as we can.
I.e., maintaining NATO's cohesion and increasing Turkey's (!) weight is more important to the American ruling class than liberating an oppressed nation and defeating ISIS.
 

EatTheRich

President
The fact is that the parliament would not have voted to keep American troops in Iraq....that is the bottom line
Exactly.

The first SOFA was ratified by the Iraqi parliament and still there were tens of thousands of people in the streets protesting.

The Iraqis killed an agreement to keep troops in Iraq....that is a fact.
Exactly.
 

EatTheRich

President
Fvck you.

1) You speak rather broadly "We Americans".......I can't name one person (all American incidentally) who ever thought that, either liberal or conservative.
Bill Clinton. Les Aspin. Madeleine Albright. George W. Bush. Donald Rumsfeld. John Sheehan. Peter Pace.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
More typical cry baby bullshit........Bush looks like a [Unwelcome language removed] genius compared to the moron currently sitting in the oval office.
Sure thing. We have Bin Laden trapped. Command on the ground asks for reinforcements. Request denied. And Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld were briefed on the request. Rumsfeld was afraid that it would look like an American war and didn't want to piss off the locals.....Are you freakin' kidding me?

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/the-battle-tora-bora

We have about 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and large numbers of Taliban and Al Qaeda escape to Pakistan...the result? We were still fighting them 10 years later. Bush had already taken his eye off the ball in November 2001. Rumsfeld told Franks to prepare plans for an invasion of Iraq and got his first briefing in December....just about the time that Dalton Fury was asking for reinforcements in Tora Bora.

Bush tells one lie after another to gain support for a completely unnecessary invasion of Iraq. We invade, he puts Jay Garner in charge....Garner makes great strides towards bringing the Iraqi army back to their barracks, this time as an ally and to help bring stability to the country. He also starts the machinery to hold elections. We are on the road to withdrawal. Bush replaces Garner (former Lt. General and middle east expert, with Paul Bremer...political hack and middle east neophyte. They now disband the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government (no Baath party member can work in government)....

The insurgency now has about 250,000 armed soldiers to recruit from...because there are no other jobs.

The result....we are fighting that war for 7 or 8 more years. The insurgency which was Al Qaeda in Iraq comes back as ISIL and we are still helping fight them in 2015.

Genius? In you book only. Too bad you are more interested in your political party than in the welfare of your country.

So now you'd like to make Bush look better than he was and blame Obama for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq in 2011....but that was part of a binding agreement that Bush negotiated and signed. Sluggo "Oh, but Obama screwed up by negotiating a new agreement"......Really? Obama offered Maliki a new agreement....Maliki turned it down.
Well....it was Obama's fault anyway....is that right Sluggo?

Bush wanted to overthrow a dictator.....it cost us 4,500 American lives and a couple trillion dollars. Obama wanted to overthrow a dictator and it cost us a few million and no American lives.

All you care about is what party he belongs to.
 
Last edited:
Z

zzigzzag

Guest
Sure thing. We have Bin Laden trapped. Command on the ground asks for reinforcements. Request denied. And Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld were briefed on the request. Rumsfeld was afraid that it would look like an American war and didn't want to piss off the locals.....Are you freakin' kidding me?

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/the-battle-tora-bora

We have about 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and large numbers of Taliban and Al Qaeda escape to Pakistan...the result? We were still fighting them 10 years later. Bush had already taken his eye off the ball in November 2001. Rumsfeld told Franks to prepare plans for an invasion of Iraq and got his first briefing in December....just about the time that Dalton Fury was asking for reinforcements in Tora Bora.

Bush tells one lie after another to gain support for a completely unnecessary invasion of Iraq. We invade, he puts Jay Garner in charge....Garner makes great strides towards bringing the Iraqi army back to their barracks, this time as an ally and to help bring stability to the country. He also starts the machinery to hold elections. We are on the road to withdrawal. Bush replaces Garner (former Lt. General and middle east expert, with Paul Bremer...political hack and middle east neophyte. They now disband the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government (no Baath party member can work in government)....

The insurgency now has about 250,000 armed soldiers to recruit from...because there are no other jobs.

The result....we are fighting that war for 7 or 8 more years. The insurgency which was Al Qaeda in Iraq comes back as ISIL and we are still helping fight them in 2015.

Genius? In you book only. Too bad you are more interested in your political party than in the welfare of your country.

So now you'd like to make Bush look better than he was and blame Obama for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq in 2011....but that was part of a binding agreement that Bush negotiated and signed. Sluggo "Oh, but Obama screwed up by negotiating a new agreement"......Really? Obama offered Maliki a new agreement....Maliki turned it down.
Well....it was Obama's fault anyway....is that right Sluggo?

Bush wanted to overthrow a dictator.....it cost us 4,500 American lives and a couple trillion dollars. Obama wanted to overthrow a dictator and it cost us a few million and no American lives.

All you care about is what party he belongs to.
I highlighted the part that Sicko will read before he replies.

I also highlighted the facts that he will dispute.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
They have no strategy for this. They are doing just enough so that when someone asked "What are we doing?"....they can point to "bombing" hope the questionnaire goes away.

The truth is what we are doing is worse then doing nothing, its barely a half measure. Either fight the war or don't.....this is nonsense.
Unreal....Bombing the shit out them is worse than doing nothing says General Sluggo....
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Write an honest sentence some day. Include a fact.

That would be a good start.
Here's a fact for you: You and your kind are mentally challenged grovelling, nut-licking sycophants for a man who is purposely trying to destroy your country. It just doesn't get any sicker or more twisted than that.
 
Z

zzigzzag

Guest
Here's a fact for you: You and your kind are mentally challenged grovelling, nut-licking sycophants for a man who is purposely trying to destroy your country. It just doesn't get any sicker or more twisted than that.
Failed miserably. Go figure.
 
Top