New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Did CNN Fire a Host and Delete the Episode for Criticizing Hillary? It appears so..

Mr. Friscus

Governor
Drew Pinsky’s six-year-old HLN show, “Dr. Drew On Call,” has been canceled by CNN, effective Sept. 22.

In a statement, CNN executive vice president Ken Jautz said he and Pinsky “have mutually agreed to air the final episode of his show on September 22″ but gave no specific reason for the cancellation.

But the decision came eight days after Pinsky’s comments on a radio show on Aug. 17 questioning the health and medical care of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president. After looking at bits and pieces of Clinton’s health-care records she made public in 2015, he said he was “gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care.”

The episode has been removed from the station’s website, but a transcript was published by the conservative Washington Free Beacon:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/26/dr-drew-show-canceled-days-after-his-negative-speculation-about-hillary-clintons-health/

So, let's look at the timeline:

1. Dr. Drew questions Hillary's Health on Aug. 17th
2. Dr. Drew and CNN "mutually" agree for a final episode just after.
3. The episode of the broadcast is deleted.

It's really the third point that is so damning here, and should lead anyone to realize that it's quite probable that CNN canned Dr. Drew simply because he "attacked" Clinton, or shed doubt on her abilities.

CNN has already been exposed to be in collusion with the DNC, from the Wikileaks Emails.

Now, they're deleting broadcasts where Hillary is criticized, and the hosts are magically having final episodes.

I think it's safe to say CNN is indeed the "Clinton News Network". No liberal can reference them with any integrity.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
The timing is beyond suspicious. Already being known as the Clinton News Network, I think rational people can agree he was canned for daring to give a negative opinion about Hillary's health.

And it's not like there's not plenty of reasons to question her health and quite frankly her mental well-being.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
they either lose their jobs or lives if they speak against the Queen
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
The timing is beyond suspicious. Already being known as the Clinton News Network, I think rational people can agree he was canned for daring to give a negative opinion about Hillary's health.

And it's not like there's not plenty of reasons to question her health and quite frankly her mental well-being.
Censorship of conservatives is going on all over the place these days.

1. Major speakers on campuses, like Condaleeza Rice, are often canceled because of threats of violent riots by liberal students and professors. And if not cancelled, they usually require body guards in many institutions. I've never heard of any Liberal that has ever needed a body guard or security to walk onto a campus.

2. Facebook was busted surpressing Conservative messages in their "Trending" application, which is represented as an organic program.

3. One of the higherups of Google was fired for giving support to a vote against Gay Marriage in California, even though I think 40% of the state or so voted that way.

4. This was awhile ago, But Rush Limbaugh was fired from ESPN for suggesting a social issue behind the glorification of Donovan McNabb, who happened to be a black Quarterbak. While initially he was a star, he had struggled for a prolonged time, but yet we still featured as the leagues most visible player. However, ESPN daily insinuates things negative about white people, and these folks are praised. (Michael Wilbon).

5. Curt Schilling was fired from ESPN for attacking the Transgender Bathroom rule in North Carolina. He had also compared ISIS to the Nazi's, but I hear ESPN hosts ripping Trump nearly every episode multiple times, or insinuating extreme things like that. Two other major hosts (Tony Kornheiser and Dan Lebatard) compared the Tea Party to ISIS. The difference here was, Schilling isn't a liberal, which ESPN blatantly is. Schilling referenced a memo sent out to all on-air talent to not initiate political discussion and stick to sports, but I hear constant attacks on Conserative stances and Trump every day. There were 4 yesterday on Pardon the Interruption alone, in which two friendly beta-males were worshipping the female guest host as all-knowing and never wrong, so obviously pandering (i.e. insulting) to women.

There's plenty more.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Drew Pinsky’s six-year-old HLN show, “Dr. Drew On Call,” has been canceled by CNN, effective Sept. 22.

In a statement, CNN executive vice president Ken Jautz said he and Pinsky “have mutually agreed to air the final episode of his show on September 22″ but gave no specific reason for the cancellation.

But the decision came eight days after Pinsky’s comments on a radio show on Aug. 17 questioning the health and medical care of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president. After looking at bits and pieces of Clinton’s health-care records she made public in 2015, he said he was “gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care.”

The episode has been removed from the station’s website, but a transcript was published by the conservative Washington Free Beacon:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/26/dr-drew-show-canceled-days-after-his-negative-speculation-about-hillary-clintons-health/

So, let's look at the timeline:

1. Dr. Drew questions Hillary's Health on Aug. 17th
2. Dr. Drew and CNN "mutually" agree for a final episode just after.
3. The episode of the broadcast is deleted.

It's really the third point that is so damning here, and should lead anyone to realize that it's quite probable that CNN canned Dr. Drew simply because he "attacked" Clinton, or shed doubt on her abilities.

CNN has already been exposed to be in collusion with the DNC, from the Wikileaks Emails.

Now, they're deleting broadcasts where Hillary is criticized, and the hosts are magically having final episodes.

I think it's safe to say CNN is indeed the "Clinton News Network". No liberal can reference them with any integrity.
He didn't "criticize" her....he diagnosed her.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
What? You mean a TV doctor gave a medical opinion on a public figure based on known information! This is unprecedented!
There are a number of folks who are doctors as well who say that what he is doing as well as what he has done in the past (predicting Brad Pitt and Angelina about to get a divorce because of her drug habit).....My bet is he'd been warned in the past...otherwise the network would be looking at a lawsuit.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
There are a number of folks who are doctors as well who say that what he is doing as well as what he has done in the past (predicting Brad Pitt and Angelina about to get a divorce because of her drug habit).....My bet is he'd been warned in the past...otherwise the network would be looking at a lawsuit.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Your guess is funny. My guess is giving his opinion on public figures is what he does and he simply gave his opinion on a sacred cow.

I find your ability to stay clear of the obvious quite entertaining.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
He didn't "criticize" her....he diagnosed her.
Worthy of deleting the episode, as CNN did?

I've heard people on other networks say Trump is "Insane". They don't suddenly leave the network, and the episodes aren't deleted.

As a matter of fact, their stock seems to go up in the company.
 

EatTheRich

President
Worthy of deleting the episode, as CNN did?

I've heard people on other networks say Trump is "Insane". They don't suddenly leave the network, and the episodes aren't deleted.

As a matter of fact, their stock seems to go up in the company.
Because Americans like to hear the truth.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
Because Americans like to hear the truth.
You just proved my point absolutely.

You think the media should censor dissenting opinion from the candidate they support.

With this example, among so many others, we are well on our way to a truly state-run media. Historically, things get ugly that way. I wish you'd care about human beings lives as I do.
 
if this was Russia, Dr. Drew would have been hit by a car, or pricked with a polonium umbrella by now.

life is better in America, for sure.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
if this was Russia, Dr. Drew would have been hit by a car, or pricked with a polonium umbrella by now.

life is better in America, for sure.
You just can't claim to be a credible news source if you're deleting episodes because of critical content of one presidential candidate, while producing programming that constantly spouts attacks on the other.

I mean, this isn't even up for debate. You can't deny the "Clinton News Network" claim.
 
Drew Pinsky’s six-year-old HLN show, “Dr. Drew On Call,” has been canceled by CNN, effective Sept. 22.

In a statement, CNN executive vice president Ken Jautz said he and Pinsky “have mutually agreed to air the final episode of his show on September 22″ but gave no specific reason for the cancellation.

But the decision came eight days after Pinsky’s comments on a radio show on Aug. 17 questioning the health and medical care of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president. After looking at bits and pieces of Clinton’s health-care records she made public in 2015, he said he was “gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care.”

The episode has been removed from the station’s website, but a transcript was published by the conservative Washington Free Beacon:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/26/dr-drew-show-canceled-days-after-his-negative-speculation-about-hillary-clintons-health/

So, let's look at the timeline:

1. Dr. Drew questions Hillary's Health on Aug. 17th
2. Dr. Drew and CNN "mutually" agree for a final episode just after.
3. The episode of the broadcast is deleted.

It's really the third point that is so damning here, and should lead anyone to realize that it's quite probable that CNN canned Dr. Drew simply because he "attacked" Clinton, or shed doubt on her abilities.

CNN has already been exposed to be in collusion with the DNC, from the Wikileaks Emails.

Now, they're deleting broadcasts where Hillary is criticized, and the hosts are magically having final episodes.

I think it's safe to say CNN is indeed the "Clinton News Network". No liberal can reference them with any integrity.
He's lucky they only killed his show.
 
What? You mean a TV doctor gave a medical opinion on a public figure based on known information! This is unprecedented!
Bionic Tonic

Illary hopes to hang on for another decade or so, just like Dick Cheney did after a number of heart attacks. Expensive doctors will cut and paste her together somehow and present her as a reasonable image of the New Woman.
 

EatTheRich

President
You just proved my point absolutely.

You think the media should censor dissenting opinion from the candidate they support.

With this example, among so many others, we are well on our way to a truly state-run media. Historically, things get ugly that way. I wish you'd care about human beings lives as I do.
How did you get that from my comment, which was about the market rewarding news companies for refusing to repeat blatantly false Trump propaganda?
 

EatTheRich

President
You just can't claim to be a credible news source if you're deleting episodes because of critical content of one presidential candidate, while producing programming that constantly spouts attacks on the other.

I mean, this isn't even up for debate. You can't deny the "Clinton News Network" claim.
Does CBS have a Republican bias because they fired Dan Rather?
 
Top