New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

antipathy towards blacks

TheResister

Council Member
Statistically, Blacks are underrepresented on TV and in movies. The false claim that they are "disproportionately represented" is rooted in antipathy to their being included at all.
ROTF LMFAO ROTF LMAO You are too funny.

In the Atlanta area, on my tv all the old game shows on television have black people replacing the white tv hosts (Steve Harvey does double duty.) The majority of the news anchors are non-white here. We have black tv stations and not one, single, solitary, white station. White stations are inclusive stations and cannot even hint that they are geared toward a "white" audience.

Oprah Winfrey makes some $200 million plus a year and is almost as rich as Donald Trump. Robert and Sheila Johnson are billionaires. Tiger Woods, Magic Johnson, Jr. - are you familiar with them at all?

Let's set the record straight for the people. If you are under 20 percent of a country's population, yet account for having 40 percent of the best jobs, that is statistically over-represented.
 

TheResister

Council Member
"When Blacks put out a song, whites don't repackage it with a white singer."
LMAO, are you serious?

Do you think earning 61% of what whites earn is "plenty of money" for Black people? Do you agree with the majority of Trump voters that "average Americans" earn less than they deserve?
See my above response.

While we could always some more money, blaming whites is short sighted. Whites have no power in America (unless you start including foreigners) and the subtle race war against them has to be exposed.
 

EatTheRich

President
ROTF LMFAO ROTF LMAO You are too funny.

In the Atlanta area, on my tv all the old game shows on television have black people replacing the white tv hosts (Steve Harvey does double duty.) The majority of the news anchors are non-white here. We have black tv stations and not one, single, solitary, white station. White stations are inclusive stations and cannot even hint that they are geared toward a "white" audience.

Oprah Winfrey makes some $200 million plus a year and is almost as rich as Donald Trump. Robert and Sheila Johnson are billionaires. Tiger Woods, Magic Johnson, Jr. - are you familiar with them at all?

Let's set the record straight for the people. If you are under 20 percent of a country's population, yet account for having 40 percent of the best jobs, that is statistically over-represented.
You literally named the 3 Black billionaires. Fewer than 1% of the Fortune 500 companies have Black CEOs. What are the "best jobs" you mean? Game show hosts in a predominantly Black market? What is an "inclusive" station? One that is not "exclusive" (all-white)?
 

EatTheRich

President
See my above response.

While we could always some more money, blaming whites is short sighted. Whites have no power in America (unless you start including foreigners) and the subtle race war against them has to be exposed.
Non-Hispanic whites, at about 64% of the population, own 98% of the land and 90% of the total wealth in the U.S. Blacks, 12% of the population, own 3% of the land and 3% of the wealth. 96% of the families in the top 1% are white. The median wealth gap between wealthier white families and poorer Black families in the U.S. is more than 4 times greater than in S. Africa under apartheid.

The president and a majority of his Cabinet are white, like every Presidency and Cabinet but one administration in their country's history.

A plurality of Americans go to a church governed by a white ecclesiastical authority and a majority worship a white God. 84% of full-time university professors are white (6% are Black). 80% of principals are white (10% are Black). 90% of American elected officials are white (2% are Black).
 
Last edited:

TheResister

Council Member
You literally named the 3 Black billionaires. Fewer than 1% of the Fortune 500 companies have Black CEOs. What are the "best jobs" you mean? Game show hosts in a predominantly Black market? What is an "inclusive" station? One that is not "exclusive" (all-white)?
Your use of English grammar makes me wonder if you understand English. The last sentence is merely a sentence fragment. Write coherent sentences if you want responses.
 

TheResister

Council Member
Non-Hispanic whites, at about 64% of the population, own 98% of the land and 90% of the total wealth in the U.S. Blacks, 12% of the population, own 3% of the land and 3% of the wealth. 96% of the families in the top 1% are white. The median wealth gap between wealthier white families and poorer Black families in the U.S. is more than 4 times greater than in S. Africa under apartheid.

The president and a majority of his Cabinet are white, like every Presidency and Cabinet but one administration in their country's history.

A plurality of Americans go to a church governed by a white ecclesiastical authority and a majority worship a white God. 84% of full-time university professors are white (6% are Black). 80% of principals are white (10% are Black). 90% of American elected officials are white (2% are Black).
Of course you have NO verifiable data to back that claim. It's absolute horsesh!+. Chinese corporations own much of America - and there are other countries out there as well. Fox News used to be (and probably still is) owned by an Australian and a Saudi Prince.

Apparently you look only at the head monkey in a few corporations and say that he or she is "white." Regardless of how many or few millionaires and billionaires are black, there would be more IF the blacks were investing their money amongst their black brethren. Apparently they aren't and you can't fault whites for that.

So, your contention is that foreign corporations, non-whites (other than blacks) and rich foreigners like Rupert Murdoch do not have any controlling interest in America? I call B.S. on that.

Did a little looking. Your figures are fudged to say the least:

http://modernfarmer.com/2013/09/owns-us-agricultural-land/

http://www.factcheck.org/2013/11/who-holds-our-debt/

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-companies-ownership-usa-idUSN2744743020080827

https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/commercial/insights/economics/special-reports/how-much-of-america-do-foreigners-own-20160927.pdf

The facts don't square with your numbers. Sorry. Better luck next time.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
Your use of English grammar makes me wonder if you understand English. The last sentence is merely a sentence fragment. Write coherent sentences if you want responses.
Nice dodge, pedant. When you talk about an "inclusive" station do you mean one that is not all-white?

By the way, your implied claim that sentence fragments are unacceptable as answers to questions is wrong. Check out the section titled "acceptable fragments" :
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/grammar/common-sentence-errors/sentence-fragments
 

EatTheRich

President
Of course you have NO verifiable data to back that claim. It's absolute horsesh!+. Chinese corporations own much of America - and there are other countries out there as well. Fox News used to be (and probably still is) owned by an Australian and a Saudi Prince.

Apparently you look only at the head monkey in a few corporations and say that he or she is "white." Regardless of how many or few millionaires and billionaires are black, there would be more IF the blacks were investing their money amongst their black brethren. Apparently they aren't and you can't fault whites for that.

So, your contention is that foreign corporations, non-whites (other than blacks) and rich foreigners like Rupert Murdoch do not have any controlling interest in America? I call B.S. on that.

Did a little looking. Your figures are fudged to say the least:

http://modernfarmer.com/2013/09/owns-us-agricultural-land/

http://www.factcheck.org/2013/11/who-holds-our-debt/

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-companies-ownership-usa-idUSN2744743020080827

https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/commercial/insights/economics/special-reports/how-much-of-america-do-foreigners-own-20160927.pdf

The facts don't square with your numbers. Sorry. Better luck next time.
I wasn't referring to foreign investment, which is irrelevant to the relative wealth / power of Blacks and whites in the U.S.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Your use of English grammar makes me wonder if you understand English. The last sentence is merely a sentence fragment. Write coherent sentences if you want responses.
We're not writing novels here. A sentence fragment is not unacceptable unless it's something with which you disagree.
 

TheResister

Council Member
We're not writing novels here. A sentence fragment is not unacceptable unless it's something with which you disagree.
What? I don't know whether I agree or disagree unless the writer expresses his or her views in complete sentences.

I thought this was a discussion board. That's a bit different from a Tweet. Discussion is a bit more in depth.
 

TheResister

Council Member
I wasn't referring to foreign investment, which is irrelevant to the relative wealth / power of Blacks and whites in the U.S.

I disagree. People are using fudged figures to somehow prove the power and money is concentrated in the hands of white people.

As for percentages, I know men in their 20s and 30s who live off their mommies. They are white, have no power, no money and are not included in any statistical data you can conjure up. Unfortunately, there are millions of those kinds of people.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
What? I don't know whether I agree or disagree unless the writer expresses his or her views in complete sentences.

I thought this was a discussion board. That's a bit different from a Tweet. Discussion is a bit more in depth.
Okay, he should have used a comma, after the word station, instead of starting a new sentence; but it doesn't detract from the understanding of the statement he made.
 

Corruptbuddha

Governor
Do you always respond in sentence fragments? Considering how???

I'm not following you. You have a poll. It makes a claim. I'm asking what the relevance is. Do you believe in the accuracy of every poll OR do you disagree with some of them based on your experiences? Do you agree with the poll you quoted? If so, of what relevance is it?
She agrees with leftist polling that align with her skewed world view.
 

EatTheRich

President
I disagree. People are using fudged figures to somehow prove the power and money is concentrated in the hands of white people.

As for percentages, I know men in their 20s and 30s who live off their mommies. They are white, have no power, no money and are not included in any statistical data you can conjure up. Unfortunately, there are millions of those kinds of people.
I would say the fact that they can get into their 30s without leaving the nest is an indication of the power their (family's) money gives them.
 

TheResister

Council Member
I would say the fact that they can get into their 30s without leaving the nest is an indication of the power their (family's) money gives them.
No, I disagree. Lots of people are now living off what the grandparents left behind. Case in point:

My wife has a 45 year old brother who... lives at home. Now that place has been passed down for a couple of generations, allowing his mother to "afford" him. When his mother passes on, he will simply get on the public dole and you will feed and clothe him.

There are a lot of younger people that don't want to work. Living in someone else's home, forcing them onto welfare and then becoming a welfarite themselves later only speaks to the National Debt. And, adding insult to injury, when this generation doesn't want to work and mommy runs out of money, the younger generation know the magic words to get Prozac... which leads them to feel good drugs and then a welfare lifestyle.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
No, I disagree. Lots of people are now living off what the grandparents left behind. Case in point:

My wife has a 45 year old brother who... lives at home. Now that place has been passed down for a couple of generations, allowing his mother to "afford" him. When his mother passes on, he will simply get on the public dole and you will feed and clothe him.

There are a lot of younger people that don't want to work. Living in someone else's home, forcing them onto welfare and then becoming a welfarite themselves later only speaks to the National Debt. And, adding insult to injury, when this generation doesn't want to work and mommy runs out of money, the younger generation know the magic words to get Prozac... which leads them to feel good drugs and then a welfare lifestyle.
For what it's worth, a majority of adults on any welfare program are off within 3 years and 99% are off within 4 years. For those receiving cash assistance through TANF, more than 60% are no longer receiving that assistance within 1 year.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7470060
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
For what it's worth, a majority of adults on any welfare program are off within 3 years and 99% are off within 4 years. For those receiving cash assistance through TANF, more than 60% are no longer receiving that assistance within 1 year.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7470060
Huffington Post? You might want to consider getting your bullshit from a more reliable source. The Democrats have created a welfare state that a majority of its recipients never get off of.
 
Top