Yeah.. really!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/01/02/learning-from-cbos-history-of-incorrect-obamacare-projections/#3bfb6f0f46a7
Now you use an anonymously written attack piece that attacks them without posting any facts that show they were actually wrong.
Problem with your comment is that Forbes has shown everything Obama said, or tried to do, was either a lie or the the work of an incompetent moron. Everything he did failed miserably. Apparently you are the only person in the country who hasn't heard this, or won't admit it.
And why did you specifically express the hope that 100 years from now a Black child wouldn't know who he was? You don't have to answer ... we know why.
First they talk about the exchanges but it does not mention the efforts the GOP went through to harm the exchanges. You can't fault the CBO for not taking into account deliberate sabotage.
How many African-Arabs you know?
21M from 2020-2026:So you'd decided out of kindness, or desperation, to potentially take fewer lives with you in this latest suicide attempt.
New study shows the Republican healthcare bill would leave up to 18 million more without insurance by 2019
Sep. 20, 2017, 2:34 PM
Mitch McConnell J. Scott Applewhite/AP Images
The latest push by Republican to repeal and replace Obamacare would leave millions more without health insurance and likely cause costs to rise for Americans in the individual insurance market, according to a study published Wednesday.
- 5-18 million more uninsured in 2019: The bill's repeal of the individual mandate, which compels people to sign up for insurance, would have immediate effects when it goes into place in 2019. Based on previous CBO scores of similar provisions, the jump in the number of people without insurance compared to the current system would be as high as 18 million in the first year.
- 32 million more people uninsured after 2026: The bill also would shift funding for Obamacare's Medicaid expansion and individual insurance market subsidies into a lump sum given to states every year. The bill, however, simply cuts off those grants after 2026. Commonwealth said the roughly 32 million people projected to be beneficiaries of these programs would simply be cut off after that date.
- Significantly higher premiums: Commonwealth also said previous CBO breakdowns of a mandate repeal showed premiums increases of 15% to 20% in the first year. "The majority of that increase would come from the repeal of the mandate penalties: insurers would expect that those who remained in the pool would be the least healthy," Collins wrote.
- Undercut protections for people with preexisting conditions: States could apply for waivers to relax some of Obamacare's regulations if it brings down costs. While the bill does say the state has to continue to provide "adequate and affordable" coverage for people with preexisting conditions, Commonwealth said the leeway for the waivers could lead to the elimination of Obamacare's protections for these people. "It would allow states to apply for waivers that would let insurers charge people with health problems higher premiums, and change other ACA consumer protections such as bans on lifetime benefit limits and comprehensive coverage requirements," Commonwealth said.
A Congressional Budget Office score that includes the full effects of the bill on insurance coverage and individuals' cost burdens will not be ready in time for a vote. Republicans can only pass it without being blocked by a Democratic filibuster until the end of the month.
http://www.businessinsider.com/graham-cassidy-health-care-bill-how-many-lose-insurance-coverage-2017-9
And apparently these are the low ball numbers that don't included all the people who also won't get insurance in the future. Also I doubt if it takes into account the people who drop insurance when they drop the mandate to get insurance.
This GOP Congress can't do anything and Trump/Pence are Statler and Waldorf.
They can they just can't do this. Get unfettered access to the money they take from these programs to fund a tax cut without Dem input. They don't get the tax cut unless they get these funds by the 29th. So they do not care what they have to do to do it. Either they pay off their donors or the donors walk away checkbooks in hand. This has absolutely nothing to do with healthcare and never did. This has to do with not increasing deficit with their tax cut. Because they would need Dem support to do that.
So in Saudi they refer to themselves as African-Saudis
OPPs
Many on OCare can't find doctors that take OCare and when they do they can't afford the cost even with OCare and soon ALL w/OCare will have nothing when it dies from it's own faults.......
So ?
Then tell me why, if you know so much.
Again, you worry that Black children will grow up with self-respect if they learn that a Black person can become president.
