They're going to blame FedEx and boycott UPS.Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
Guns are designed strictly for killing people!!! A bomb isn't designed strictly for kill-... wait, never mind.Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
We should restrict the use of boxes, packing tape, bomb making materials and definitely Fed-Ex!Guns are designed strictly for killing people!!! A bomb isn't designed strictly for kill-... wait, never mind.
I'm thinking the latter.Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
No liberals will be blaming white malesWill the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
Nope. None of those.Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
Bingo we have a winner.Nope. None of those.
This time it will be Christians who are to blame.
And.......... Home Schoolers.
When Christians can be blamed, Lefty will leave the blame of the inanimate objects and go straight to the person.
Did they wash his carcass down the drain....Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
Is there a practical use for boxes that does not include making them into bombs ?Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
Hunting.Is there a practical use for boxes that does not include making them into bombs ?
Now tell me the practical uses for a gun that does not include killing or injuring living beings.
Liberals need :Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.
1. MovingIs there a practical use for boxes that does not include making them into bombs ?
Now tell me the practical uses for a gun that does not include killing or injuring living beings.
Paper WeightsIs there a practical use for boxes that does not include making them into bombs ?
Now tell me the practical uses for a gun that does not include killing or injuring living beings.
You have to kill or injure a living being when you hunt, successfully that is.Hunting.
Target shooting.
A gun is impractical for any of those purposes. They all can be filled by other items much more effectively.Paper Weights
Driving Nails
Boat Anchors
Door Stops
Consistency demands that we ban or heavily regulate ingredients that can be used to make explosives.Will the Liberals be blaming the boxes?, packages? etc.? Or will the declare that the bomber at fault and run with it?
I ask because he used an inanimate object to carry out his attacks and usually that gets blamed.