Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Said Rosenstein...

PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”

No. Basis.

So, there's that.

Brace for pretzel logic...
 
Bugsy McGurk

Bugsy McGurk

President
PhilFish said:
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”

No. Basis.

So, there's that.

Brace for pretzel logic...
Click to expand...
Impeachment is a more appropriate constitutional remedy.
 
Bugsy McGurk

Bugsy McGurk

President
Constitutional Sheepdog said:
And your justification is?
Click to expand...
Obstruction of justice is a lock, as is his unending campaign to destroy America’s institutions. Criminal conduct during the election, money laundering, and fealty to Putin/treason are very likely as well, but the Mueller report will confirm those crimes. Dozens of impeachment counts are on the table.
 
Last edited:
MrMike

MrMike

Bless you all
PhilFish said:
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”

No. Basis.

So, there's that.

Brace for pretzel logic...
Click to expand...

What....Rosenstein is implying that folks should give no credibility to stories from (wait for it) "anonymous sources giving info to the NYT?? (or any other MSM outlet)

Tell me this is fake news? :eek:
 
PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
MrMike said:
What....Rosenstein is implying that folks should give no credibility to stories from (wait for it) "anonymous sources giving info to the NYT?? (or any other MSM outlet)

Tell me this is fake news? :eek:
Click to expand...
sadly the laddie boy can't play both sides of the fence it'll be interesting to see how this plays out
 
Spamature

Spamature

President
PhilFish said:
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”

No. Basis.

So, there's that.

Brace for pretzel logic...
Click to expand...
Translation: No way this crook gets off by setting up an insanity defense. I didn't say nuthin !
 
Winston

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
PhilFish said:
“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”

No. Basis.

So, there's that.

Brace for pretzel logic...
Click to expand...
If there are documents that say different Rosipoo will need to explain them
 
Constitutional Sheepdog

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Bugsy McGurk said:
Obstruction of justice is a lock, as is his unending campaign to destroy America’s institutions. Criminal conduct during the election, money laundering, and fealty to Putin/treason are very likely as well, but the Mueller report will confirm those crimes. Dozens of impeachment counts are on the table.
Click to expand...
Fienstine is closer to obstruction than Trump had ever been
 
UPNYA2

UPNYA2

Mayor
Bugsy McGurk said:
Obstruction of justice is a lock, as is his unending campaign to destroy America’s institutions. Criminal conduct during the election, money laundering, and fealty to Putin/treason are very likely as well, but the Mueller report will confirm those crimes. Dozens of impeachment counts are on the table.
Click to expand...
Easy enough to SAY. Apparently a wee bit harder to actually PROVE.

Otherwise why are we STILL "looking into" sh it? The way you dems/libs so despise Trump if you already had anything you could prove, fukin' jay-walking, ANYTHING, you would long ago have fallen all over yourselves trying to be the one who finally takes out the dreaded one.

So why are you waiting? Do it already...……..
 
resident_evil

resident_evil

Senator
Bugsy McGurk said:
..., and fealty to Putin/treason are very likely as well, but the Mueller report will confirm those crimes. Dozens of impeachment counts are on the table.
Click to expand...
Treason? At least Trump isn't krypto-advocating for the dissolution of the Union like Dems are. Heck Dems already peeled off California and are just about to give it to Mexico.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top