Why did Hillary have her staffers destroy her mobile devices after she got a subpoena? Did she have incriminating texts that might hurt her? Who knows now? Hillary wiped her email server clean. Why would she do that? Your excuses for her suck!
There could have been a lot of evidence in those personal emails! Are you really that dumb??? Besides the fact that nobody writes that many personal emails in just 2 years, let alone keep them all on the server to clog everything up. You're quite naïve.
She did it because she thinks the same rules apply to her as apply to all government officials - she was under no obligation to produce personal emails.
Evidence of what?
I said Hillary didn't lie? I said she DOES lie. Whether or not she lied about the emails, I don't know and neither do you. And like Hillary, I know Ivanka lies. Her business dealings are being scrutinized along with her husband's and brother's business dealings. Unless Trump shuts down all investigations into his family like he has his on tax returns and other dealings, we might never get an answer. Isn't that what Trump wants? To be like Putin and other dictators? Not accountable for a thing? Is that what YOU want, Jen, the Mueller investigation shut down, no scrutiny into his financial dealings with Putin and the Saudis, no questions about the Saudi's spending millions to stay in Trump facilities, which pads his personal account?
I see. You wanted Hillary’s personal emails preserved and produced because they might have had evidence of, well, something. You know not what.
Like I said....she deleted them all, so we'll never know. There could have been evidence in those personal emails. Maybe she talked about government business in some of them. Do you know she didn't? No. Neither do I. But the way she handled this makes her look guilty as hell. And stop with your stupid "rule" comments. You know damn well I never said it was a rule. But when someone in the Government has done something wrong, it should be a law that at that time on they need to hand EVERYTHING over. If any of us had done this, and destroyed what could be evidence, we would be spending years in prison. It wouldn't matter if we said we didn't know. The FBI protected her....that's the only reason she got away with it. But I like that a Judge is now saying she has to answer some questions under oath about it. Then again....she'll say she didn't know, doesn't remember, or take the 5th. Like all liberals do.....
Translation: I can name no GOP officials to whom I apply the same “rule” about personal emails. I’m an absurd GOP hack.
Liar. That is not what I said. Everyone should have the same rules. But the extent of the punishment should be determined by their cooperation and how far it went. Just like a drug user doesn't get as harsh of a punishment as the drug seller does.
. In this case....Hillary is the drug seller. Ivanka has cooperated from the beginning.
More nonsense.Liar. That is not what I said. Everyone should have the same rules. But the extent of the punishment should be determined by their cooperation and how far it went. Just like a drug user doesn't get as harsh of a punishment as the drug seller does.
You're feeding the DNC paid troll for QuartersLiar. That is not what I said. Everyone should have the same rules. But the extent of the punishment should be determined by their cooperation and how far it went. Just like a drug user doesn't get as harsh of a punishment as the drug seller does.
Turns out, deleting emails is legal. I’ve done it myself and I bet you have too.
Handing over everything she was told to hand over proves she had something to hide?
She said “no” to a subpoena? Got a link? Or were you duped by the propaganda about her deleting emails outside the scope of the subpoena even as she turned over every email that was in fact under subpoena, and misled into thinking the emails she deleted were the subpoenad ones?
The illegal part for Hillary was destroying the emails after they were under subpoena. As far as I know, Ivanka has destroyed nothing.
Comey and the FBI went out of their way to slime her and attempt to pin a technical violation on her but they gave up because the case just wasn’t there.
She didn't have to say the word "no". By destroying the emails and not handing them over, the "no" was implied. Odd that I have to state the obvious to you......but okay........ low information folks just have a hard time with actually getting information.
Destroyed evidence ... of what? She turned over every email within the scope of the subpoena.
Did Clinton, either?
