EatTheRich
President
No.Did you vote for Clinton ?
No.Did you vote for Clinton ?
That's not who's being separated. The illegal border crossers are. (US Code 8, Section 1325)Asylum seekers actually committed no crime.
No, it’s more like if I paid you a wage for doing a job and then you sent some of it to your family.1. Really.
2. I don't know where you got this idea about me and landlords, but if you read one of the 10 OPs I wrote today, you'll see different >>
https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/yes-im-a-conservative-but-some-rent-control-is-necesary.116548/
As for "workers choosing to send money to their families", that's kind of like if I burglarized your house, removed your TV, computer, a few other things , and then sent them my family.
Actually, they receive more $$ in welfare than native-born Americans do. They are eligible for state and local benefits$$, and they get federal benefits$$ via the anchor baby racket, false documentation, and sympathetic US welfare workers who turn a blind eye.Aliens aren’t eligible for the vast majority of welfare programs. If they come here for jobs, that means they are coming to avoid starvation.
The idea of separating migrant children from their mothers was discussed during the earliest days of the Trump administration as a way to deter asylum-seekers, according to notes from a closed-door DHS meeting.That's not who's being separated. The illegal border crossers are. (US Code 8, Section 1325)
No, it's more like what I said. There are nations involved. Money extracted from one, reinserted into the other.No, it’s more like if I paid you a wage for doing a job and then you sent some of it to your family.
So what ? That doesn't change the fact that all families with arrested parent get broken up. We don't hear about the American ones. (they don't represent Democrat VOTES)The idea of separating migrant children from their mothers was discussed during the earliest days of the Trump administration as a way to deter asylum-seekers, according to notes from a closed-door DHS meeting.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna884371
The only “anchor baby racket” is yours when you complain about citizens getting help because they fit a made-up category you assigned to separate them from other citizens.Actually, they receive more $$ in welfare than native-born Americans do. They are eligible for state and local benefits$$, and they get federal benefits$$ via the anchor baby racket, false documentation, and sympathetic US welfare workers who turn a blind eye.
Yes it is. Oh did CNN tell you different ?That’s not what the administration was talking about when they used the phrase “catch and release.”
People getting paid a wage for doing a job here (and without their labor the economy would collapse). Those people then voluntarily choose to send THEIR MONEY to another country ... no different from you using your money to buy a Kia.No, it's more like what I said. There are nations involved. Money extracted from one, reinserted into the other.
Got no idea what you just said. Maybe it's just as well.The only “anchor baby racket” is yours when you complain about citizens getting help because they fit a made-up category you assigned to separate them from other citizens.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5a144263e4b010527d6780b0/amp
1. Sure they do.So what ? That doesn't change the fact that all families with arrested parent get broken up. We don't hear about the American ones. (they don't represent Democrat VOTES)
“Catch and release” refers to deporting people without creating a paper record that can be used for prosecutions of future immigration violations.Yes it is. Oh did CNN tell you different ?
Yeah, the economy would collapse all right. >> The MEXICAN economy. US remittances to them are their # 1 source of income. And losing $138 Billion/year, doesn't help the US economy. It is a major DAMAGE to it.People getting paid a wage for doing a job here (and without their labor the economy would collapse). Those people then voluntarily choose to send THEIR MONEY to another country ... no different from you using your money to buy a Kia.
If they weren’t allowed to send money to their families many probably wouldn’t come do the jobs that their labor is needed for in the first place.Yeah, the economy would collapse all right. >> The MEXICAN economy. US remittances to them are their # 1 source of income. And losing $138 Billion/year, doesn't help the US economy. It is a major DAMAGE to it.
You can call remittance imperialism, "THEIR MONEY" but if things were handled as they should be , they would not be allowed to send that money out of the US. And just because somebody is spending their own money doesn't make it OK.
People spend their own money on illegal drugs, child porn, and bribing politicians. THEIR MONEY.
Is this the propaganda that is going ut over the air on CNN, MSNBC, et al liberal OMISSION media ? No wonder you guys are so screwed in the head.“Catch and release” refers to deporting people without creating a paper record that can be used for prosecutions of future immigration violations.
Good. Then maybe they wouldn't come here, and steal jobs from Americans.If they weren’t allowed to send money to their families many probably wouldn’t come do the jobs that their labor is needed for in the first place.
Govt commit a crime ? Now what are you yammering about ?1. Sure they do.
2. At least they are arrested on suspicion of crime and not because the government has decided to commit a crime wholesale.
And that's because of Red Don's illegal metering tactics at the border.That's not who's being separated. The illegal border crossers are. (US Code 8, Section 1325)
There are e no (U.S.-born) Americans’ jobs, or immigrants’ jobs. Only workers’ jobs. Anyway, the U.S.’s economy demands more labor than the U.S.-born working class can provide, which is why it creates a market that inevitably leads to immigration and why the “day without an immigrant” strikes brought the country to its knees.Good. Then maybe they wouldn't come here, and steal jobs from Americans.