Zam-Zam
Senator
We'll see.
Two years in.....not much to show for it so far.
If it stays that way, Mueller may have reason to worry.
Great fun, no?
Have I ever mentioned how much I love being proven correct...
- Thread starter Raoul_Luke
- Start date
Two years in.....not much to show for it so far.
If it stays that way, Mueller may have reason to worry.
Great fun, no?
EatTheRich
President
Is there a major player in Trump’s campaign who hasn’t been indicted yet and isn’t part of his family? Pence, I guess ...
EatTheRich
President
Actually this has been one of the most fruitful investigations in history. 2 years into the Watergate investigation there was far, far less.
So far Trump has lost 4 pawns...Flynn, Manafort, Cohen and Papdopoulos...although Flynn may be more a castle and Manafort a bishop.
What has Mueller lost? Nothing.
ObamacareForever
Senator
How can go around saying "NO COLLUSION" when you can't even define it?
My gawd your lib education makes you look stupid
"How can go around saying "NO COLLUSION" when"
How can YOU/WHO/WHAT???????????????????????????????????????
You libs want to see COLLUSION: Here boy=
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/12/17/christopher-steele-i-was-hired-to-help-hillary-clinton-challenge-the-2016-election-results/
Zam-Zam
Senator
Dodged my challenge, I see.
I can define it. I don't feel compelled to perform for you on demand.
You can continue to insist, if you like. That'll be fun.
Zam-Zam
Senator
2 years of his life, chasing his tail.
Zam-Zam
Senator
We'll have to agree to disagree.
The big fish, still not in the net. The little guppies will not satisfy.
you miss the whole point, in trying to prove conspiracy the guppies must be persuaded to roll on the big guy..
Zam-Zam
Senator
If you say so.
That doesn't alter the fact, however, that too this point, Mueller still hasn't accomplished the only objective his fanbase cares about.
Whether he ever does or not remains to be seen.
Wonderful theater. A circus maximus for the plebs...…:>)
ObamacareForever
Senator
I don't believe you. Everyone knows its a moronic political tactic. Republicans won't lay down a hard definition because they can't be drawing lines in the sand. It's too risky a proposition. Whatever line they draw Trump will likely step over. They want a movable goal post. They are going to have to move the goal post a long long ways before they are anywhere close to being righteous.
"Collusion" is just Republicans attempt at branding. Here's Mueller's mandate...
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html
Nowhere is the word "collusion" even in it.
Zam-Zam
Senator
Do you imagine that I care what you choose to believe?
Do you imagine that it's difficult for any adult to look up the definition of any common word?
Do you imagine you've made a convincing argument?
It's all good.....:>)
Oh, as for the "Republican branding"...….
"It’s always smelled like collusion," Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said in an interview. But after this week's developments, he said, "It doesn’t smell less like collusion. It smells more."
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/28/democrats-trump-russia-investigation-congress-1025919
It appears Swalwell didn't get the memo......
I think most people discussing collusion are actually talking about conspiracy. The crime committed is the hack on the DNC email server, resulting in the release of emails that someone hoped would hurt Hillary, if not help Trump.
If there was even a hint that if Hillary lost, Trump would offer favorable policies to Russia in return...that is conspiracy.
Seems like a far more appropriate cause than the investigations into White Water, Benghazi or the IRS...
marvin martian
Emperor
Enough about Obama, please.
EatTheRich
President
Trump makes Obama look like a piker.
marvin martian
Emperor
In the meantime, though, he's making $1.8 million a year and stringing along a trail of hopeful treasonists who desperately want to overthrow our legitimately elected government, but lack the courage to do it themselves.
Zam-Zam
Senator
Starr spent $60 million...how many members of Clinton's administration were prosecuted? One...a lawyer for overcharging his clients.It would, to those who like the Kool-Aid.
Benghazi. What did we learn? Nothing we didn't already know at the out set.
IRS. How many indictments? None. What illegal act was committed? None. What unethical act was committed? None.
What flavor kool-aid have you been drinking?
