New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

“Socialism destroyed my home”.

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So when he linked to that sentiment on his web site, he was either too stupid to know what the writer meant, or too stupid to know how to link to something that he actually did believe. Which do you suppose it was?
1. Did you read the article? There was quite a bit more to it than just the last two sentences.
2. Again...it was false to say he'd been spouting that line for years.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
1. Did you read the article? There was quite a bit more to it than just the last two sentences.
2. Again...it was false to say he'd been spouting that line for years.
Yes, literally it was "false" to say he'd been saying it for years. But if his web site had the link to the guy who DID say it up for "years" is it effectively unfair to suggest he shard the opinion?

As I said - of course he's going to promise us "Scandinavia." But in fact what he is attempting to deliver (for the reasons I pointed out in the post you dodged) is Venezuela.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Yes, literally it was "false" to say he'd been saying it for years. But if his web site had the link to the guy who DID say it up for "years" is it effectively unfair to suggest he shard the opinion?

As I said - of course he's going to promise us "Scandinavia." But in fact what he is attempting to deliver (for the reasons I pointed out in the post you dodged) is Venezuela.
You are dodging my post all together. I don't like Sanders and wouldn't vote for him. I don't care what he promises. My point was that I prefer honesty in the debate. He didn't say what the poster claimed he'd said.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Disagreed. Your claim is true only to the extent that the capitalist class still holds political power in that country.
You can disagree if you want, it doesn't change reality. Russia has its share of wealthy, just like China. Socialism isn't about the people, it's about power being consolidated at the top.
 
in virtually all instances (with very few exceptions) if you are poor at age 35 it is YOUR fault and YOUR fault alone as your station is the direct result of the choices you made
Sperm Bingo Is Not a Game of Skill

Only if being born rich can be considered a "choice." The Preppies' representation as adults in the next 1% is twenty times what it logically should be. That has to mean that HeirHeads also determine whom they will allow to class-climb. For their own protection, they will mandate that "self-made" success be based on brown-nosing, not brains.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
You are dodging my post all together. I don't like Sanders and wouldn't vote for him. I don't care what he promises. My point was that I prefer honesty in the debate. He didn't say what the poster claimed he'd said.
And you refuse to admit that linking to the sentiment (say, as someone does here to an opinion piece with which they agree) is a distinction without a difference.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
And you refuse to admit that linking to the sentiment (say, as someone does here to an opinion piece with which they agree) is a distinction without a difference.
Details matter. The allegation was that he'd been saying that for years.
 

EatTheRich

President
Quite right, slick.

Does it ever occur to you to ask why it is that it never seems to make it to the utopian universal equalitarian economic paradise you folks keep telling us it will be? Ever spent any time around, well, people? Duh!
It doesn’t take a utopia to be an improvement on capitalism. The first socialist societies will naturally be the most capitalistic and therefore backward, just as the first capitalist societies were the most stamped by feudalism. Yet you use the fact of inadequate progress away from a society that turns people into creeps as an argument against any progress.
 

EatTheRich

President
So these folks were headed in the wrong direction, were they?

Cuban boat people
Well, a considerable number ended up going back, and not a few have made the trip the other way. But that’s not really the point. If the U.S. offered automatic residency and job placement to any Irish person who came over, there would be Irish boat people trying to get into the richest country on Earth. The U.S. offers special privilege to lure Cuban immigrants and then pretends as if that proves something about Cuba other than that for al it’s progress it hasn’t yet caught up to the U.S. economically.
 

EatTheRich

President
you seemed to have missed the part where I said with very few exceptions, that being said being affected by "illness, handicaps, economic recessions or depressions, accidents, plague, drought..." are almost always the result of choices by the individual. choosing lifestyle that makes one prone to illness, choosing to have a condition and treat it as a handicap, choosing to live check to check and the like. Thank you for re-enforcing my point
People don’t choose to live check to check. The capitalist system depends on the average wage being just enough to subsist on till the next paycheck.
 

EatTheRich

President
You can disagree if you want, it doesn't change reality. Russia has its share of wealthy, just like China. Socialism isn't about the people, it's about power being consolidated at the top.
Russia and China are countries where ... after bloody counterrevolutions ... capitalism has been restored. If the governing caste had been set to rule economically under socialism, they wouldn’t have fought so hard to bring capitalism back.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Russia and China are countries where ... after bloody counterrevolutions ... capitalism has been restored. If the governing caste had been set to rule economically under socialism, they wouldn’t have fought so hard to bring capitalism back.
We allowed China to adopt a faux capitalism through our opening it up for trade. It has had its wealthy all through its history, however. Same with Russia. In socialist nations, the wealthy and the political class are all the same class. China has created a new workers class in order to power its factories and run production out of necessity.
 

redtide

Mayor
People don’t choose to live check to check. The capitalist system depends on the average wage being just enough to subsist on till the next paycheck.
yes they do and it is almost always a culmination of the choices they made in life. the only ones who believe differently are those who seek to blame others for their lot in life. SAD
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
People don’t choose to live check to check. The capitalist system depends on the average wage being just enough to subsist on till the next paycheck.
Yes of course people choose to live paycheck to paycheck... whether or not they are intelligent enough to realize it.
 
Top