New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

California drought has ended, climate change nuts.

Days

Commentator
Climate change also happens when the composition of the atmosphere is changed.
wrong

climate is the long term weather pattern of an area due to their elevation, orientation to the sun, situation to the oceans... composition of the atmosphere is always changing and it isn't climate.
 

EatTheRich

President
wrong

climate is the long term weather pattern of an area due to their elevation, orientation to the sun, situation to the oceans... composition of the atmosphere is always changing and it isn't climate.
No, the drastic change in the composition of the atmosphere has led to more heat being retained in the troposphere.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY

RickWA

Snagglesooth
A warming climate causes more extreme weather events. More extreme droughts, and more extreme rain events. More extreme heat waves and more extreme cold snaps.
And more wind, and less wind.

Basically, the beauty of the Communist Cudgel (climate change) is that more and less of everything - every single eventuality - is cited as conclusive evidence. We’ve even seen a 5-10 year period of cooling cited as evidence of warming.

Don’t worry - at no time do I post in this forum of closed-minded fundamentalist doctrinaire absolutists in an effort to persuade or convince. We all know that isn’t happening. Neither do I reject the notion that climate changes. It does and always has. At no point in earth’s history has it had static climate. I merely reject all arguments for/remedies offered that demand increased governmental authority over private individuals. This includes the constant calls to intrusive regulatory excess and central-planned Marxist nonsense.
 

EatTheRich

President
And more wind, and less wind.

Basically, the beauty of the Communist Cudgel (climate change) is that more and less of everything - every single eventuality - is cited as conclusive evidence. We’ve even seen a 5-10 year period of cooling cited as evidence of warming.

Don’t worry - at no time do I post in this forum of closed-minded fundamentalist doctrinaire absolutists in an effort to persuade or convince. We all know that isn’t happening. Neither do I reject the notion that climate changes. It does and always has. At no point in earth’s history has it had static climate. I merely reject all arguments for/remedies offered that demand increased governmental authority over private individuals. This includes the constant calls to intrusive regulatory excess and central-planned Marxist nonsense.
There has not been a 5-10 period of cooling. In fact, the past 5 years were the 5 hottest years on record. Nor do I know of anyone claiming that global warming would result in less wind (and indeed it has not). Yes, global warming causes occasional local cold extremes, in just the places (northern North America and Europe) where they were predicted, but that is not the same as global cooling. Anyway, you missed the point about extreme weather events. An individual weather event does not confirm the theory, but a strong statistically significant increase in the frequency of extreme weather events like 1000-year floods does.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
There has not been a 5-10 period of cooling. In fact, the past 5 years were the 5 hottest years on record. Nor do I know of anyone claiming that global warming would result in less wind (and indeed it has not). Yes, global warming causes occasional local cold extremes, in just the places (northern North America and Europe) where they were predicted, but that is not the same as global cooling. Anyway, you missed the point about extreme weather events. An individual weather event does not confirm the theory, but a strong statistically significant increase in the frequency of extreme weather events like 1000-year floods does.
Yes, episodes of cooling have indeed been directly attributed to AGW. Yes, what has been described as unusual bouts of stillness, calm, and doldrums have indeed been attributed to AGW.

I guess when one arrives at the point that all the world is enveloped in AGWs death grip, everything that happens is attributable to AGW...and everything is caused by AGW. Just a few months ago, I read direct attribution of the Anchorage earthquake to - yep, you guessed it, AGW. Even plate tectonics is not immune it seems.

PS: Didja know Trump is complicit? Alaska sez, “Thanks, Trump!”
 

reason10

Governor
I wonder why you say "everybody says"....as if you speak for anyone but yourself and in my opinion your opinions aren't worth much.
Because EVERYBODY is most of America, outside of this [Unwelcome language removed] safe room that you pussies are terrified to leave. EVERYBODY says you liberals are IDIOTS, which is why Democrat candidates do NOT run on the liberal labe.
 

reason10

Governor
It has not changed slightly. It has changed about as much in our lifetimes as it has in the prior 10000 years. And the rate of change is growing.

BULL [Unwelcome language removed] SHIT.

The change of the climate of the world has not altered ONE [Unwelcome language removed] IOTA compared to the history of the planet BEFORE (a) the primordial fish swamp from the swamp to become apes, then humans, or (b) Adam and Eve were in the Garden Of Eden. (Depending on which version of creation you believe.)

There has not been an ICE AGE, since the first humans. There has not been a massive warming that melted the poles, since the first humans. The weather today is pretty much the same as it was 65 years ago. Not a whole lot has changed, except for the IQs of a bunch of already dumbfuck liberals who obviously ate paint chips as children.
 

FakeName

Governor
A warm
And more wind, and less wind.

Basically, the beauty of the Communist Cudgel (climate change) is that more and less of everything - every single eventuality - is cited as conclusive evidence. We’ve even seen a 5-10 year period of cooling cited as evidence of warming.

Don’t worry - at no time do I post in this forum of closed-minded fundamentalist doctrinaire absolutists in an effort to persuade or convince. We all know that isn’t happening. Neither do I reject the notion that climate changes. It does and always has. At no point in earth’s history has it had static climate. I merely reject all arguments for/remedies offered that demand increased governmental authority over private individuals. This includes the constant calls to intrusive regulatory excess and central-planned Marxist nonsense.
A warming climate causes more extreme weather events.

It is really not that difficult.
 

FakeName

Governor
Negative and if you'd have read the article you wouldn't look so stupid. The Housing Supply isn't there and employers are moving out of Cali so they can find employees.

No wonder there are so many tent cities in Cali and the need for an app on phones to let you people know where human waste is on sidewalks, $2300 for a 350 sq ft apartment. Hell, some tents are that big or bigger!

Right.

You prove my point. More demand than supply equals high prices.
 

Nostra

Governor
A warm


A warming climate causes more extreme weather events.

It is really not that difficult.

Weather events prove MMGW...................but don't try to use weather events to question the Cult because equating climate change to weather events is silly.

And Cultists don't know how stupid they sound.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
A warm


A warming climate causes more extreme weather events.

It is really not that difficult.
At once, it causes both more and less of everything. The singular possible accepted condition that is not immediately attributed to AGW would be a static climate (a thing that has never existed in earth’s history). That is a rather perfectly crafted scenario.

I agree, it really is not difficult at all.
 

Nostra

Governor
Hurricanes are "extreme weather events", yet their numbers are down since man started warming the Earth.

Weird, huh?
 

FakeName

Governor
At once, it causes both more and less of everything. The singular possible accepted condition that is not immediately attributed to AGW would be a static climate (a thing that has never existed in earth’s history). That is a rather perfectly crafted scenario.

I agree, it really is not difficult at all.
You are mischaracterizing it.

Picture a pendulum. A warming climate causes the pendulum to swing wider in both directions.
 

4/15

Mayor
Hurricanes are "extreme weather events", yet their numbers are down since man started warming the Earth.

Weird, huh?
As the oceans of the atlantic and Gulf may be warm the needed hot air rising is not present as the warm waters are warmer farther north in the atlantic off new york area.
 

RickWA

Snagglesooth
You are mischaracterizing it.

Picture a pendulum. A warming climate causes the pendulum to swing wider in both directions.
Dude. I am a chemist by training, a Chem E by vocation. I understand the science. Very well. What I reject is simple:

1) Attribution of all weather, climate, and tectonic events to AGW. It has become cartoonish.

2) Prescriptive address of AGW which entails surrendering individual and private sovereignties to increasing state reach and control.
 

EatTheRich

President
Yes, episodes of cooling have indeed been directly attributed to AGW. Yes, what has been described as unusual bouts of stillness, calm, and doldrums have indeed been attributed to AGW.

I guess when one arrives at the point that all the world is enveloped in AGWs death grip, everything that happens is attributable to AGW...and everything is caused by AGW. Just a few months ago, I read direct attribution of the Anchorage earthquake to - yep, you guessed it, AGW. Even plate tectonics is not immune it seems.

PS: Didja know Trump is complicit? Alaska sez, “Thanks, Trump!”
Yes, episodes of local cooling have been attributed, using statistical analysis with very strong confidence levels and a causal mechanism based in fundamental physics, to AGW. In fact, such episodes and their timing were predicted in advance by the scientists whose research underlay the theory.

The melting of hundreds of tons of ice could well affect plate tectonics.
 

EatTheRich

President
BULL [Unwelcome language removed] SHIT.

The change of the climate of the world has not altered ONE [Unwelcome language removed] IOTA compared to the history of the planet BEFORE (a) the primordial fish swamp from the swamp to become apes, then humans, or (b) Adam and Eve were in the Garden Of Eden. (Depending on which version of creation you believe.)

There has not been an ICE AGE, since the first humans. There has not been a massive warming that melted the poles, since the first humans. The weather today is pretty much the same as it was 65 years ago. Not a whole lot has changed, except for the IQs of a bunch of already dumbfuck liberals who obviously ate paint chips as children.
There is an Ice Age now. There had not been a massive warming that melted the poles since the evolution of modern humans, until now.

The past claimants changes that you are touting as proof that the current climate change is nothing to worry about generally took place over tens of thousands of years. The current catastrophic climate change (not the first, but the first for tens of millions of years) is taking place over decades.
 

EatTheRich

President
At once, it causes both more and less of everything. The singular possible accepted condition that is not immediately attributed to AGW would be a static climate (a thing that has never existed in earth’s history). That is a rather perfectly crafted scenario.

I agree, it really is not difficult at all.
What would falsify AGW would be weather patterns consistent with chance variation or known natural causes, instead of predicted-in-advance weather patterns that are entirely inconsistent with these with near one probability,
 

EatTheRich

President
Hurricanes are "extreme weather events", yet their numbers are down since man started warming the Earth.

Weird, huh?
As projected. Cold snaps are extreme weather events as well, and their numbers are down also. But the ones that do occur tend to be worse. And when all the other extreme weather events are considered, there is no question that on the whole such events are becoming more common.
 
Top