EatTheRich
President
To recap: “not terrorists”=murdering people based on their race. “Terrorists”=peacefully demonstrating against racial murder.
Here it is. The most outrageous example of black privilege in history
- Thread starter make speed limit 45
- Start date
Colorforms
Senator
Cop killing = Terrorists = Black Lives Matter
You defend BLM, you defend terrorists.
EatTheRich
President
Name one BLM operation that killed a cop. You can’t, because no such operation ever occurred.
Actually, BLM has no doubt saved countless cops’ lives by channeling the righteous anger of the people against police abuses away from fruitless individual acts of revenge and into a disciplined fight for structural change.
Colorforms
Senator
Again, I have, on several occasions, to you. I'm done defending something just because you're too dishonest to admit it.
Emily
NSDAP Kanzler
No, they don't. You look only at the proportion in shootings; you need also look at the proportions in crimes committed. I apologize for not having the source readily available, but I read one piece a while ago with statistics showing that blacks are shot and shot lethally in lower proportion than Whites when accounting for criminal behavior by race.
There is no systemic or institutional pattern of racist genocide in the USA. You just need to assert that there is in order to advance your agenda. The USA is the least "racist" nation in the history of the world; now is the least "racist" time in the history of the world.
Ability and qualifications aren't racial advantages. Blacks and minorities have mandated advantages in hiring and admissions and the list goes on.
While, numerically, women outnumber men, in sociological terminology, women are classed as a minority precisely because we've been disadvantaged. Whites are a minority numerically. Blacks vastly outnumber us world-wide. They're still classed as a minority.
Women are disadvantaged in many areas. I was addressing the legal system specifically, in reply to a post that did so. There, women are advantaged.
Because we didn't have "leaky roofs matter" slogan first.
As typically, you invent and use racial motives where none exist.
And, as the photos illustrate, blue lives matter isn't racist.
Okay. I can see that as a legitimate point of view.
However, would there have been a lawsuit such as that one brought by a White? Would a White have won such a lawsuit? Any answer can only be speculation, but I'm inclined to say no.
'Twas Obama's policy. The Trump administration executed it.
Numerous.
https://www.governing.com/columns/col-problem-with-preferential-bids.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful-truth-about-affirmative-action/263122/
https://nypost.com/2015/12/08/college-quotas-are-actually-destroying-lives-of-minorities/
https://www.heritage.org/education/report/race-preference-college-admissions
https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/WestFaulconFromRacePreferences.pdf
http://www.debatingracialpreference.org/CRSReport.htm
https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1514&context=vulr
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-minority-business-status-24816.html
https://www.kabbage.com/blog/benefits-of-being-a-minority-owned-business
https://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-inequality/report/discriminating-toward-equality-affirmative-action-and-the-diversity
https://newsone.com/165891/many-whites-filing-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits/
https://davidduke.com/the-real-racial-discrimination-that-goes-on-in-america/
https://www.npr.org/documents/2017/oct/discrimination-whites-final.pdf
https://www.inc.com/jt-odonnell/this-white-male-cant-get-hired-should-we-feel-sorry-for-him.html
http://fortune.com/2016/01/13/corporate-diversity-white/
I've lived it. I see it daily.
Of course you do. They're good ones, too. They're also advancing an agenda via spin. For example, the piece on "whitening" resumes merely assumes that resumes without indicators of the race of the applicant are favored because of racial bias when there could be other reasons such as, again for example, preferring employees who are appear inclined to work well in teams of any racial make-up over those who appear to consider race a key factor in choosing their associations. The piece citing the meta-study on blacks and Latinos takes no account of qualifications, only of race, as another example.
Obvious/Obfuscate - TomAYto/TomAHto
Thank you for linking sources.
EatTheRich
President
Whites have a huge advantage over Blacks with identical qualifications. For example, with everything else being equal, being Black is going to count more against someone applying for a job than having a felony conviction.
The proportion of people, Black or White, who commit violent crimes is so minuscule that it cannot account for the disparate rates at which people who are law-abiding are killed.
No, the term “black lives matter” came out first. The others were used as a way to mock the term. I know you don’t see it that way, but many of us did.
Emily
NSDAP Kanzler
So you keep saying. Yet all the quotas and set-asides and diversity initiatives and all that favor the blacks.
Ya ever think, just for a moment, that maybe the blacks don't get ahead here like Whites of European ancestry, or like the Chinese, or like Indians, or like Jews, or like any other group that doesn't get specially mandated advantages in hiring, etc. because they're just not, on average, as capable?
I thought we were talking about crime suspects shot by police? There are oodles of stats -- blacks commit far more crimes, by proportion in the population, than any other group. 'taint racism what get's 'em shot -- 'tis cops dealing with reality.
Sad commentary on society that some people see slogans like "blue lives matter" and "all lives matter" as derisive.
Vying for victimhood status to get special privileges, I guess. Silly -- Jews won that race to the bottom long ago.
UPNYA2
Mayor
Wait...……..WHAT?
"Libel"? LIBEL"?!?!?!?!?!?!
This coming from a poster who has posted the following sh it, in just the first 2 pages of this thread;
1) “co-workers celebrating the killing of people who look like you.”
2) “cops also disproportionately shoot Blacks because the pattern of racist genocide is systemic and institutional and not based on individual animus.”
3) “all attention to the lives that the “Blue Lives Matter” slogan implies are worthless”
4) “Police are not supposed to convict and execute people on the spot.”
5) “it isn’t about cops’ lives at all, it is about their violent whims.”
6) “police were encouraged to persist in killing and kidnapping.”
7) “the pro-genocide slogan mentioned in the top posted story.”
8) “The only people using the slogan use it to mean that cops’ whims matter and they should never be held accountable for their systematic institutional murder of Blacks.”
9) “Blacks shouldn’t die based on their race.”
10) “Blue lives matter” means “the arbitrary and capricious policies of police are being equated in importance to lives as a means of asserting that it is OK to kill Blacks based on race.”
Sorry my loony libb y friend but anyone who posts such horse sh it as this does not ever, EVER, get to accuse anyone else of fukin' LIBEL.
EatTheRich
President
Systemic racism is like giving whites a twenty-meter head start in a 100-meter dash. Affirmative action is like cutting that head start to ten meters.
No, because I’m not so sheltered that I could entertain that possibility, and because I know that scientists have thoroughly investigated and rejected that hypothesis.
Police shouldn’t be in the business of convicting “crime suspects,” sentencing them to death, and executing them on the spot.
That was the intent of those slogans and you know it. Otherwise why did no one assert those slogans before others started asserting that Black lives matter too?
EatTheRich
President
Look up the definition of libel. It refers to false statements of fact.
UPNYA2
Mayor
My point precisely...….
EatTheRich
President
Statements like “Blacks shouldn’t die based on their race” are statements of opinion and statements like “Black cops also disproportionately shoot Blacks” are true statements of fact.
The Sage of Main Street
Governor
All This Whining Recites the 1%'s Order to "Pretend They Offend"
Black Lives Matter means that cops' lives do not matter, so Blue Lives Matter does mean Blackist lowlifes do not matter.
The Sage of Main Street
Governor
Bluebloods Hate Whitey
You're just as much of a dupe of the united upper class as are trailer-park Republicans who believe that Wall Street is on their side.
The Sage of Main Street
Governor
None Dare Call It Treason
Like CAIR and LULAC, it should be prosecuted under the RICO Act and its members put on a chain gang, where such violent enemies of society have always belonged.
The Sage of Main Street
Governor
Hearts Bleeding for the Bloodthirsty
Its lawyers defend terrorist acts against police and encourage more of them.
EatTheRich
President
Yet you are the one defending their state and its thugs.
EatTheRich
President
Where’s the violence?
The Sage of Main Street
Governor
The Princes' and Princesses' Pincer Movement
Only in your self-gratifying imagination does the ruling class's Left flank work independently from its Right flank.
