New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

There is no climate change

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
She did not say the Earth was ending as you reported. She used a metaphor.

And, no, the nuke protesters were not proven right. Even without global warming, nuclear has been far less harmful than fossil fuels. And an accident on Chernobyl’s scale is unlikely to ever happen again.
Sorry kid she said it and she meant it, and there is actually a very simple reason for what she said, no matter how strange it might seem to others, which is that she is a schizophrenic.

You can not from a logical perspective provide even one reason why another meltdown can not occur. Actually a far smaller meltdown than Chernobyl in a more populated area could be far more catastrophic then Chernobyl was. But in your mind since nuclear power does not emit CO2 it's perfectly safe...……. Shit Oyster Creek in NJ is going to take 60 years to close fully.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
The “climate pause” never actually happened.
Correct because climate change is a permanent part of the Earths dynamic equilibrium for over 5 billion years.

I knew you would see it my way.

When by the way was the time when climate change is known to have not been happening?

Next
 

EatTheRich

President
Sorry kid she said it and she meant it, and there is actually a very simple reason for what she said, no matter how strange it might seem to others, which is that she is a schizophrenic.

You can not from a logical perspective provide even one reason why another meltdown can not occur. Actually a far smaller meltdown than Chernobyl in a more populated area could be far more catastrophic then Chernobyl was. But in your mind since nuclear power does not emit CO2 it's perfectly safe...……. Shit Oyster Creek in NJ is going to take 60 years to close fully.
Chernobyl was based on a design that was already obsolete when it was built. Modern plants have containment shells, for one thing.
 

EatTheRich

President
Correct because climate change is a permanent part of the Earths dynamic equilibrium for over 5 billion years.

I knew you would see it my way.

When by the way was the time when climate change is known to have not been happening?

Next
You are equivocating on the meaning of “climate change.” Most colloquial use of it today refers to the abrupt alteration of long-standing climate patterns due to very rapid global warming. Not at all the same as the climate changing due to variability caused by effects manifested over much longer time scales or by the chaotic effects of tiny variations.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Chernobyl was based on a design that was already obsolete when it was built. Modern plants have containment shells, for one thing.
Ant the half life of spent nuclear fuel is only 159200 years...... Which technically is of no consequence since the dumokrappic party has revealed that the World is ending in 11 years and some days anyway.

So would you rather breath CO2 or Plutonium dust? Perhaps you can try both then get back to me
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
You are equivocating on the meaning of “climate change.” Most colloquial use of it today refers to the abrupt alteration of long-standing climate patterns due to very rapid global warming. Not at all the same as the climate changing due to variability caused by effects manifested over much longer time scales or by the chaotic effects of tiny variations.
Lol, the only long standing climate pattern is the massive warming trend that ended the ice age and has continued into the present interglacial.

Synopsis, global warming has been happening for 20000 years and was and is not caused by humanity
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
No. China still burns a lot of coal. It’s just that their coal combustion has peaked even as their population as economy continue to grow.
Kid you are so dysfunctional that you are [Unwelcome language removed] up on the meanings of yes and no.
 

reason10

Governor
No, they weren’t wrong at all. Far from it.

Yes they were. And all the best independent minds have proven they were wrong. NONE of their idiotic predictions have materialized. In this arena, it's not good enough to have good intentions. One has to be held accountable.


No, we aren’t in the greatest economy of all time. Far from it.

Black unemployment is at a historic LOW. (Probably the greatest economy of all time for black people, but I remember that you want them all on welfare, food stamps and crack.) More people are working good jobs now than at any other time in history. Food stamp use is at a historic LOW. The stock market continues to break records. Even the Reagan economic miracle didn't post miracles like this. There is NO Democrat administration's economy that can come anywhere NEAR this. I know that you don't like Trump and that you're upset that he has been proven right, but you will not get away with LYING about him. This economy is better than the Carter, Clinton and Obama economies all combined.

No, your misrepresenting what the scientists and journalists reporting on them and fabricating checks from your favorite Jewish bogeyman said does not make them wrong.

I haven't misrepresented ANY of the nonsense from these hacks to claim to be scientists and journalists. But thanks for being honest and admitting you hate Jews.
 

reason10

Governor
]1. The Earth is not cooling over any statistically significant period of time.

You've already lost that argument. The science has spoken. I have given you several credible links, something you aren't accustomed to.


2. The Heartland Institute folks are literally paid shills.

But not on the payroll of George Soros, which gives Heartland more credibility than your hacks.

3. Galileo based his opposition to a faith-based consensus on evidence. You are basing your opposition to an evidence-based consensus on unsupported assertions and conspiracy theories.

Once again, you lost a point and you try to change the subject. Galileo was the father of modern physics and the "Scientific Method." And it was faith-based opposition to his SCIENCE that came from government. His views were anything but faith based. (You REALLY need to do some reading. You're REALLY off in left field on this one, and for a loon like you that's really saying something.)


4. The IPCC summarizes the top research in the leading peer-reviewed journals. Their firm position that human activity is causing warming reflects the firm position of the best scientists.

In other words, they read the OPINIONS of fellow hacks, who likewise depend on flawed computer models and cash checks written by George Soros. And somehow you think that gives them any credibility? You extremist lefties aren't impressing anyone with that term "Peer reviewed." It has no real credibility. It just means more idiots agree with certain idiots.


5. Literally every major scientific body in the world agrees. Soros doesn’t have enough money to buy off all those people who devoted their lives to science.

He doesn't have to. And he hasn't been able to buy off anyone who has devoted his/her life to science. No REAL scientist is buying this global warming/climate change bullshit. Most REAL scientists disagree with these fairy tales.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
]1. The Earth is not cooling over any statistically significant period of time.

You've already lost that argument. The science has spoken. I have given you several credible links, something you aren't accustomed to.


2. The Heartland Institute folks are literally paid shills.

But not on the payroll of George Soros, which gives Heartland more credibility than your hacks.

3. Galileo based his opposition to a faith-based consensus on evidence. You are basing your opposition to an evidence-based consensus on unsupported assertions and conspiracy theories.

Once again, you lost a point and you try to change the subject. Galileo was the father of modern physics and the "Scientific Method." And it was faith-based opposition to his SCIENCE that came from government. His views were anything but faith based. (You REALLY need to do some reading. You're REALLY off in left field on this one, and for a loon like you that's really saying something.)


4. The IPCC summarizes the top research in the leading peer-reviewed journals. Their firm position that human activity is causing warming reflects the firm position of the best scientists.

In other words, they read the OPINIONS of fellow hacks, who likewise depend on flawed computer models and cash checks written by George Soros. And somehow you think that gives them any credibility? You extremist lefties aren't impressing anyone with that term "Peer reviewed." It has no real credibility. It just means more idiots agree with certain idiots.


5. Literally every major scientific body in the world agrees. Soros doesn’t have enough money to buy off all those people who devoted their lives to science.

He doesn't have to. And he hasn't been able to buy off anyone who has devoted his/her life to science. No REAL scientist is buying this global warming/climate change bullshit. Most REAL scientists disagree with these fairy tales.
Someone is living between your ears
 

EatTheRich

President
Ant the half life of spent nuclear fuel is only 159200 years...... Which technically is of no consequence since the dumokrappic party has revealed that the World is ending in 11 years and some days anyway.

So would you rather breath CO2 or Plutonium dust? Perhaps you can try both then get back to me
And non-radioactive waste never turns safe. The elements with the highest half-lives are the most stable and least dangerous ones, the sort that direct exposure to every day of your life might raise your risk of cancer by 1/10000.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
And non-radioactive waste never turns safe. The elements with the highest half-lives are the most stable and least dangerous ones, the sort that direct exposure to every day of your life might raise your risk of cancer by 1/10000.
Again if a fossil fuel power plant blows up you can walk thru the smoke if a nuke plant blows up you can actually do the same thing, just dont expect to have any hair or bone marrow when you get out.

Have you been mushroom picking at Chernobyl yet?
 

EatTheRich

President
Yes they were. And all the best independent minds have proven they were wrong. NONE of their idiotic predictions have materialized. In this arena, it's not good enough to have good intentions. One has to be held accountable.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming

More people are working good jobs now than at any other time in history. Food stamp use is at a historic LOW.

Low-wage jobs are the fastest-growing, and food stamp cutoffs just mean that those low-wage workers don’t have enough to feed their children.


I haven't misrepresented ANY of the nonsense from these hacks to claim to be scientists and journalists.
Sure you have, like when you claimed that “if something is not done by the year 2000, entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth” meant “entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth by the year 2000 if something is not done.” Or that more than a minority of scientists were projecting global cooling in the 1970s.

But thanks for being honest and admitting you hate Jews.
You’re the one fabricating a conspiracy of pure evil by a guy who just so happens to be Jewish. I’m just pointing out that you’re not above making anti-Semitic appeals to justify your attacks on science.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming



Low-wage jobs are the fastest-growing, and food stamp cutoffs just mean that those low-wage workers don’t have enough to feed their children.




Sure you have, like when you claimed that “if something is not done by the year 2000, entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth” meant “entire nations could be wiped from the face of the Earth by the year 2000 if something is not done.” Or that more than a minority of scientists were projecting global cooling in the 1970s.



You’re the one fabricating a conspiracy of pure evil by a guy who just so happens to be Jewish. I’m just pointing out that you’re not above making anti-Semitic appeals to justify your attacks on science.
No climate model has ever predicted agw. Furthermore no climate model has ever predicted the climate, just weather and like you enjoy saying climate is not weather
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
There are hordes of people living between my ears. The human brain is amazing, that way. It's not as bad for me as it is for the idiot liberals here. At least I'm right.
What exactly do you expect to teach the idiot liberals?
 
Top