Delegates unilateral power to Barr.
https://apnews.com/9e926bfccb5947d5a5f8eb260cb0a7e6
On the brink of madness....
https://apnews.com/9e926bfccb5947d5a5f8eb260cb0a7e6
On the brink of madness....
I agree, Jenny. Let’s stsrt with trump’s personal finances.Since Democrats want to continue to nag and investigate and do anything else to bring down Trump at the expense of doing the job they were elected to do, maybe it's time to just open things up and let everyone see what actually happened.
Democrats have had every chance in the world to accept the 2016 election and move on.
They haven't done that.
So......... let's get this finished.
I hope Barr uses his power to open the books on the Russian Collusion thing.
Interesting that Trump didn’t delegate to Barr the power to declassify things that are damning to the Trump crime family. No surprise there.Delegates unilateral power to Barr.
https://apnews.com/9e926bfccb5947d5a5f8eb260cb0a7e6
On the brink of madness....
Such as? The unredacted Mueller report remains available to certain members of congressInteresting that Trump didn’t delegate to Barr the power to declassify things that are damning to the Trump crime family. No surprise there.
Oh well, I’m sure Trump’s stooge Barr will be very fair in what he chooses to declassify, no?
Such as? The unredacted Mueller report remains available to certain members of congress
But not to the public. Publicly releasing all of it is not consistent with the Trump/Barr flim-flam.Such as? The unredacted Mueller report remains available to certain members of congress
Releasing it all publicly is illegal. Of could you know this. You are just still butthurt like the rest of my base.But not to the public. Publicly releasing all of it is not consistent with the Trump/Barr flim-flam.
that is correct, is there some prevailing requirement that all investigatory material regardless of whom the person is is to be released tot the general public?But not to the public. Publicly releasing all of it is not consistent with the Trump/Barr flim-flam.
Nope. The classified parts can be declassified, just like Trump has authorized as to intel he can use in his jihad against the patriotic investigators who unveiled the Kremlin’s election crimes. And Baghdad Barr could ask the court to authorize the release of grand jury material, as was done with prior investigations of presidents. And there’s no legal impediment as to the parts Barr is hiding because he says they would be “embarrassing.”Releasing it all publicly is illegal. Of could you know this. You are just still butthurt like the rest of my base.
Of course it’s not “required” - that’s why Baghdad Barr is hiding it.that is correct, is there some prevailing requirement that all investigatory material regardless of whom the person is is to be released tot the general public?
Excellent you're making good progress. It is not required to be released therefore it is hidden, barr is doing nothing wrongOf course it’s not “required” - that’s why Baghdad Barr is hiding it.
Nope. It’s hidden because Trump and Barr want it hidden.Excellent you're making good progress. It is not required to be released therefore it is hidden, barr is doing nothing wrong
precisely and it's their prerogative to release them when appropriate, not because you want them. Classified documents are released all the time, but typically after administration's leave, or presidents are out of office, or where they may no longer have an impact to current goings-on that they adversely affect individuals. nothing wrong with it, nothing sinister to it, that's just the way it's doneNope. It’s hidden because Trump and Barr want it hidden.
See my post above as to the steps to release the whole report - steps that Trump and Baghdad Barr refuse to take.
As I just said above, Trump and Barr will happily release classified intel on a selective basis that they think my boost their jihad against Trump’s investigators. They don’t give a hoot about the national interest, or the damage they are doing to law enforcement. But Trump and Barr have no such interest in releasing classified intel that would be harmful to Trump and his cronies.precisely and it's their prerogative to release them when appropriate, not because you want them. Classified documents are released all the time, but typically after administration's leave, or presidents are out of office, or where they may no longer have an impact to current goings-on that they adversely affect individuals. nothing wrong with it, nothing sinister to it, that's just the way it's done
As I just said above, Trump and Barr will happily release classified intel on a selective basis that they think my boost their jihad against Trump’s investigators. They don’t give a hoot about the national interest, or the damage they are doing to law enforcement. But Trump and Barr have no such interest in releasing classified intel that would be harmful to Trump and his cronies.
Sorry, but I just cannot fathom the FBI just ignoring it when they receive information suggesting that the Kremlin was illegally interfering in our election, with a candidate’s team speaking of their inside info about such crimes. Of COURSE they investigated it. The very notion that they “corruptly” made that decision is shocking.How do we, or you for that matter, knowno the damage hasn't already been done law enforcement? what evidence do you have to suggest that everything was done on the up-and-up?
we questioned police officers behavior and motivation all the time in this country. Does it not stand to reason that we may want to do the same with those in the highest levels of our law enforcement entities?
even more shocking would be knowing about it since 2014, potentially even sooner, and limiting one's investigation only to one candidate who now happens to be presidentSorry, but I just cannot fathom the FBI just ignoring it when they receive information suggesting that the Kremlin was illegally interfering in our election, with a candidate’s team speaking of their inside info about such crimes. Of COURSE they investigated it. The very notion that they “corruptly” made that decision is shocking.
Why?I agree, Jenny. Let’s stsrt with trump’s personal finances.
Jenny called for transparency. I'm on board.Why?